10 of 10 people found the following review helpful
Karajan's Best K 626,
This review is from: Mozart: Requiem (Audio CD)
I have Karajan's recordings of the Requiem - the 1962, 1976 and the one in question - and the 1986 performance is the most compelling of the trio and a strong contender in a crowded market.
Why? Well, firstly, much like his recordings of the Bruckner 7th (1970, 1976 & 1989), Herbie progressively sped up in this work over time. Each movement, by and large, is faster than its predecessors. This is an asset; the Bohm DG alternative is leaden by comparison. When abetted by the Vienna Philharmonic (which was a miraculous ensemble in the 1980s - and the timpanist has a field day, happily), it makes for wonderous results.
The soloists are not overly memorable (with the exception of Burchuladze in the Tuba Mirum) and the sound-engineers could have done better in certain instances (choir-wise, where are the sopranos and altos in the first movement?? - they are inaudible - but the rest of the performance is first-rate).
Even so, these are sunspots. Listen to the end of the Lacrymosa - it is genuinely elegaic. The Hostias, redolent with grace, is an antidote to the period-practice atrocities so often committed against this movement. The so-called Sussmayer elements in the work - insofar as they can be so labelled with certainty - blaze forth as if penned by the Master himself.
Make no mistake: those wanting a traditional recording of this masterpiece - in the best sense of that word - should not go past this recording, ne absorbeat eas tartarus, ne cadant in obscurum.
Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 19 Jun 2015 08:04:08 BDT
Kati K. says:
I am certain that Mozart finished the whole work. Mozart detractors give not the deserving (but defenceless) Master, Mozart, the credit, but rather a counterfeiter. Ridiculous. As in life, so in death - as below, so above.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›