Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Learn more Download now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now

Customer Review

on 23 December 2008
I was reading the first part of the book and admiring the `reportage' and excellent 'journalism' of the writer. I met many Portuguese guys that left and came back to Angola when the war ended and I was still looking for the why, what made people leave everything they've toiled for, their farms, houses, churches, animals, the icon of the family's saint above the door frame. Kapuscinski tell their story nicely, his story make sense.

But then he leaves Luanda and travel to the fronts and my affair with him ends there.
I live in and out of Angola for over 7 years now, I've been there when the war ended, I worked with war veterans from both sides. I have good MPLA friends and good UNITA friends. I met South-African that were here, fighting, and Portuguese farmers that never left. I traveled the country by length. I know the places that Kapuscinski visited. I know them well.

Kapuscinski does what I thought a good foreign journalist in a new place must not do- take a side. How can you tell a story when your political views are so one sided (and in 1975 Kapuscinski came from a Communist, not a Socialist country and the war in Angola was, when the book was published in 1976, an important icon of the cold war- a case study for `war by proxy').

When one can see only the mixed race elite of Luanda as the legitimate owners of that land yet one choose to ignore the views of everyone else, as educated but yet fully African.

Most of the friends Kapuscinski make are white or mixed race Angolan. Some of them Portuguese adventurers, but they chose a communist flag so they represent the brave young republic and for them Kapuscinski will cross journalist lines and will pass information that might help stop the `others' to whom he does not speak, which he does not even meet. The others must be puppets of foreign masters and their white soldiers all mercenaries.

The Cuban where the one really to turn the tide, 25,000 of them will be a much more accurate number then what the book says. It wasn't just their uniforms that made UNITA run as Kapuscinski suggests, it was also their MIG airplanes and their heavy tanks and the mountains of Russian AK 47's that they brought with them.
This book tells an interesting story and it tells it nicely. The story was told in a political context, not just a journalist context. There are so little stories about that period of time so this little different in context is Important.

The product summery quotes from the book: "It's wrong to write about people without living through at least a little of what they are living through', I agree, a fair rule. I only wish Kapuscinski would have kept it beyond his immediate political views.
14 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse| Permalink
What's this?

What are product links?

In the text of your review, you can link directly to any product offered on Amazon.com. To insert a product link, follow these steps:
1. Find the product you want to reference on Amazon.com
2. Copy the web address of the product
3. Click Insert product link
4. Paste the web address in the box
5. Click Select
6. Selecting the item displayed will insert text that looks like this: [[ASIN:014312854XHamlet (The Pelican Shakespeare)]]
7. When your review is displayed on Amazon.com, this text will be transformed into a hyperlink, like this:Hamlet (The Pelican Shakespeare)

You are limited to 10 product links in your review, and your link text may not be longer than 256 characters.


Product Details

4.5 out of 5 stars
19
£8.46+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime