Shop now Shop now Shop now See more Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop now Shop now
Customer Review

6 of 6 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Excellent textbook for Torts first-timer, 22 May 2010
This review is from: Tort Law (Paperback)
A very clear and well laid out textbook. Use of boxes and shading is very well applied to draw attention to specific areas and prevent boredom setting in from simply reading long, breakless chapters.

There is a high level of detail which never becomes overwhelming, and plenty of comparison/contrast within the law.

One of the best aspects is the way the authors have drawn attention to the contemporary debates within Tort law. There is plenty of constructive criticism and the law is set in its policy and historical setting, helping the reader to understand the broader aspects of the law.

End of chapter summaries are clear and concise and reference is provided to further in-depth material and academic debate. The footnotes are also helpful in clearing up small issues.

Overall an excellent introduction to the law of Tort.

I have one specific criticism (which does not detract from the book overall), on page 47 the authors provide a detailed examination of a particular case (X and Y v London Borough of Hounslow). The case was decided relatively recently and presumably made it into the book shortly before it was published. Unfortunately this case has been overruled by the Court of Appeal, so although the discussion in the book is still interesting, the case itself was actually wrongly decided.

Tort law is a fast moving subject and any book is liable to be out of date after a few years - still, the insertion of a case at the time only recently decided at first instance seems a little risky!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-1 of 1 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 7 Nov 2011 21:38:50 GMT
It was probably a comment for the previous edition. In the 2011 edition of the textbook the authors still provide the detailed analysis of this case, but with a comment that it was overruled and that the claimants took their case to the ECtHR.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: Sheffield, UK

Top Reviewer Ranking: 8,749,902