The idea that Aknnaten and his queen were actually Adam and Eve is completely and totally ridiculous. The time frames alone make it a complete nonsense. Akhnaten may well have been Moses, there are some connections there, but Adam? The only modern commentary on the origins of "The Adam" (The Earthling) that joins astute scholarship with scientific rationality comes from Zecharia Sitchen, the Sumerian scholar, in his wonderful (and life-changing) series of books, The Earth Chronicles. The Adam was a hybrid creature, genetically created by the Anunnaki scientist, Enki to work as a slave in the gold mines of Africa. He was the first "working prototype", and he was followed by countless others, until we were given the gift of sexual reproduction (the "knowing" as it was referred to in Genesis) and we were able to breed. This is the most important story of mankind's origins: read Sitchin for the unbelievably detailed (and believable) account of how our solar system came into being, how the Anunnaki came to create us and subsequently dominate us (and still do, according to many researchers) as our first gods, and how they bestowed upon us, more than 6,000 years ago in Sumer, all the scientific and cultural knowledge that we needed to build the first true civilisation. Unfortunately, most modern historians are so constipated by their own academic "credentials" and so totally immured in their "safe" 19th century paradigm that they cannot see let alone accept the huge, blinding truth of Sitchin's research. Whether we like it or not, we are extraterrestrial in origin, but to grasp the core truths of human beginnings requires a seismic mind-shift, and most scientists and academics are, unfortunately, quite incapable of that.