Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle New Album - Steps Shop now Shop Women's Shop Men's
Customer Review

5 of 16 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Terrific defense of the Reich, beating back the British Hun, 30 Jun. 1999
By A Customer
This review is from: The Pity of War (Hardcover)
There were no real "good guys" or "bad guys" in the Great War, but more than any other country, Germany is demonized for its role in starting the war, and among far too many uneducated American "patriots" is the notion that Britain and France heroically "beat back the HUN," some megalomaniacal beast that had consumed much of Europe and sought world domination. At least, in the past several years, many people have recognized that the Germans were in no way the monsters that they were initially made out to be, yet the Kaiser and the German war effort continue to be classified as destructive forces. This book is an excellently written revision of these misguided notions, and one the demands the attentions of any serious student of the great war.
I submit that, rather than Germany being the nightmarish state that it would later become in 1933, Germany was a nation plagued by the greatst conceivable historical calamities, and, once it had finally become a world power in 1870, sought merely (at least at first) to take an equal role with its European neighbors in wolrd governance, to find its place in the sun. Furthermore, Germany was by no means the most aggressively imperialistic nation of Europe, and did not proceed to annex what was left of the uncolonized third world to the extent that Britain and France did in the 1890s. So who can we point to as the true agressors in the Great War. Surely, it must be Britain. While many believe that Germany severed its friendship with Britain by building a grand navy, the truth is that Britains navy was far larger and more powerful than the German navy, and the British Empire always remained many times larger than the German Empire. Realistically, the British had nothing to fear from German naval ambitions. And when it became clear to the German High Command that war with both France and Russia was inevitable, Germany acitvely sought some sort of agreement with Britain. To be sure, this was masked by one German show of force after another, but what Germany wanted and needed more than anything else was the friendship of the British. The potential benefits of a German-British Alliance are too numerous to recount here, but suffice it to say that such an alliance would surely have brought enough glory and power to the British Empire to sustain for several centuries, to say nothing of the benefits for Germany. Yet Britain chose the ruinous path of strife with Germany, and although the British eventually succeeded in destroying the Reich (and thereby destroying the strongest land power on earth, a perfect counterbalace for British naval supremacy), the result of the Great War was the effective end of European imperialism and global domination. Furthemore, the bitterness of the post war years resulting from the Versailles peace brought about WWII, and the de facto end of the British Empire. Thus, Britain fought the Great War on the side of anti-imperialist forces, including British imperialism. If it can be any consolation to the Germans whose Empire was shattered and for whom the Great War was an unfathomable and undigestible loss, at least the British betrayal ruined "Britannia" as well as the Fatherland.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-2 of 2 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 15 Nov 2009, 04:41:55 GMT
Last edited by the author on 15 Nov 2009, 04:45:15 GMT
Another boring anti-British rant completely disregarding the Belgian rape and the wholly unnecessary invasion of two neutral countries, which, however you want to dress it up, Britain did not force. This post also conveniently forgets the fact that the Kaiser was in fact the most disastrous diplomat in the world at that time.

Perfect counter-balance to British naval supremacy? Irrelevent given that this was sacrificed to Washington in the aftermath anyway.

Posted on 1 Jan 2010, 17:31:40 GMT
Totally agree that this review is motivated by anglopobia.Germany was indeed an agressive power, especially as regards Russia.
The German High Command thought that an attack on Russia should be made quickly, before she became too powerful.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›