Shop now Shop now</arg> Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen with Prime Shop now
Customer Review

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Competent, though more drama please..., 8 Jun. 2013
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Burma 1942 (Hardcover)
In terms of the historiography of the Second World War that of the Far East remains not just the first cousin to the European and Mediterranean theatres, but such a distant relation that it often appears they are not even related. This is especially true of the Japanese invasion of Burma, which began in late 1941, and reached its triumphant apogee only six months later as the defeated British marched out, humiliated, across the Chindwin at Kalewa, into monsoon-swept Manipur and the relative safety of India. It was an immense disaster for Britain, China and the vast numbers of Indians domiciled in Burma who trusted fully in the continuance of British rule for their security amidst a generally hostile Burmese population. It was also the longest retreat in the history of the British Army, the troops retiring from Rangoon nearly 1,000 miles in 100 days. Had it occurred at any other time in history (Singapore fell in February) it would play a much more dominant role in British military history, on a parallel with such horrors as the retreat from Kabul in 1842, the slaughter on Majuba Hill in 1881 or the incompetent defence of Kut in 1916. There have only been a handful of published accounts of this dreadful time, some by survivors, a few excellent though horrifying memoirs and, until now, only a tiny number of books dealing with the events of this period as part of a lucid, historical narrative.
It is for this reason that Alan Warren's foray into this subject is to be welcomed. An academic historian in Australia, his account is thorough and the context of war in Burma in 1941 and 1942 clearly presented. He weaves accounts of the participants (seemingly secured entirely from published sources) into his narrative in a coherent and thoroughly competent way. His account of the naval battles in the Indian Ocean add very useful strategic context to all that was going on at the time on land. It is clear that Warren is a master of the technical dimension of the historian's art.
However, the book is not the full-orbed account that it could be, because Warren's approach and style over emphasises the principle of historical detachment. As a result the book conveys none of the passion and drama of these times that make the period so overwhelmingly vivid, from the debates in London, Singapore and New Delhi over strategy and resources, to the agony and grief of the wet jungle battlefield. There is no analysis of the protracted and bitter debates between Wavell, Hutton, Smyth and - later - Alexander, about whether or not to defend Rangoon forward. Nor have we any sense in these pages of the human drama of the time; of 'Dormouse-Smith's' naivety, Wavell's exhaustion and anger, Hutton's prevarication, Smyth's arrogance, Alexander's ignorant nonchalance and Slim's cool brilliance. It is these things that bring the reality of life in Burma in 1942 alive, for the British at least. These were tumultuous times, but little sense can be gained from these all too clinical and dispassionate pages of the chaos, fear, passion, anger, trauma and end-of-the-world feeling more readily apparent in books written, for instance, by Louis Allen, James Lunt and Alfred Draper. It is unfortunate that in his laudable eagerness for objectivity Warren has missed much of the human drama, heroism and dirty squabbling, both British and Japanese, that characterised these times.
It appears also that Warren has depended exclusively on accessible published sources for his material, and has ignored the unpublished diaries, memoirs and diaries that are readily available in archives in the UK. The Burma Campaign Memorial Library at SOAS in London has an almost complete collection of everything ever published on this campaign, but a study of his bibliography indicates that Warren was seemingly unaware of its existence when writing his book. There are certainly some surprising gaps in his use of secondary sources, such as his failure to examine the work of Daniel Marston on the Indian Army. Equally, nothing seems to have been taken from the vast treasure of official documents - war diaries, accounts of battles, formal and semi-formal correspondence - that are bursting at the seams of files in the National Archives in Kew. For these two reasons an otherwise excellent account remains deficient. The subject still awaits exhaustive - and less dispassionate - treatment, the best of which still remains that by Ian Lyall-Grant and Kazuo Tamayama (1999).
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

Be the first person to comment on this review.

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in

Review Details


4.5 out of 5 stars (2 customer reviews)

3 star

2 star

1 star

Add to basket Add to wishlist

Location: Berkshire, England

Top Reviewer Ranking: 35,561