This is a largely a work of fiction and victimhood.
The author peppers his work with checkable factual errors, whether through ignorance, laziness, bias or malice, to the extent that the essence of his work constitutes a falsehood, such that he can not be considered a "historian". He is merely a propagandist. And if on top of that he can't even spell, doesn't apply the rules of grammar and syntax and writes sentences of incomprehensible contortion, then he is an incompetent propagandist.
Don't believe me? Have a look at the details [...]
You will enjoy a rollicking read! But the author won't.