Shop now Shop now Shop now Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Learn more Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Pre-order now Shop Men's Shop Women's
Customer Review

22 of 24 people found the following review helpful
2.0 out of 5 stars A Poor Second, 5 July 2012
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Foreign Bodies (Paperback)
Cynthia Ozick, Foreign Bodies

The plot is borrowed from Henry James's The Ambassadors, but there the resemblance ends. This is a book that was shortlisted for the Orange Prize (2012) and it comes with many commendations, including The Times `s assurance that Ozick's eleventh novel is `breathtaking ... a superb story about the reversal of world order and identities.' I'm inclined to agree with the Guardian that `Ozick is possessed of a voice distinctly her own', but when that voice grates on the reader's nerves as this one does most would prefer Henry James's. True, someone should have taught Henry James how to write simple English, just as someone should have told Dickens that sentimentality in fiction is nauseating. Never mind the Orange Prize nomination, the book must be a contender for the greatest number of rhetorical questions in a work of fiction.

The plot, like the prose, is somewhat convoluted, but, to simplify, it deals with the contrast between a heavy father, Marvin Nachtigall, a self-made man of business with no time for aesthetic sensibilities and his no good son, Julien, who escapes from American materialism to the softer, easygoing life of Paris. The angry father then orders his sister, Bea, to bring his son back. When this venture fails his daughter, Iris, repeats the abortive attempt. Both women, however, become seduced by Parisian culture, although Aunt Bea is at first rejected by her niece, who shelters her brother and his new waif-wife, Lili, a Romanian refugee.

The story is told mainly through the eyes of Bea, who, as her name implies goes about doing good - or, rather, trying to - much to the fury of her control freak brother Marvin, an impotent rage-filled observer, whose ambassadors consistently fail him. There are constant letters between the two, as Marvin vents his frustration not only with his son, but the whole Communist-thinking world - watch out little Lili, who has stolen the useless Julien!

My main quarrel with the novel is with its excruciating prose, often disguised as internal monologue. Open any page at random and, no matter which character has the viewpoint, you find whole swathes of portentous twaddle, such as Lili's reflections on her man-boy husband: `She looked at the boy: a bodily gaze, every pore an eye. A longing struck her - a pang. His head had an unexpected beauty, even in the tender curve of the full chin. His flesh held the weight of his feeling; his appetite for meat, she suddenly knew, was a hunger for feeling. She recognised him as someone she had missed; misjudged; passed over. And she had inflicted on him a pitiless blight. Her hand was as gory as Lady Macbeth's. Her hand was a guillotine.' This is Romantic Fiction at its worst and Henry James would surely find it cringe-making.

However, this novel contains much to admire - the scenes with the bullied wife, Margaret and her final demise are beautifully handled, but the demerits of the book detract: wavering point of view between omniscient, internal monologue and oratio obliqua; the laying on of imagery as with a trowel (`A heaving sea brooded in her head ... her head ... waxworks ...or ... or ... or ... something volcanic.' [Author's ellipses]); a plethora of one-word sentences or non-sentences; and the constantly hysterical overwriting. It's certainly a mile away from The Master.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines ">here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in


Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-5 of 5 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 4 Dec 2012 14:56:30 GMT
Patrician says:
Great review, I agree with almost every word..including remark about Dickens. Although I too think there are some better parts, I could only give it 1 star because the overblown prose swamps everything. Badly structured, too. In brief, a poor novel which seems to have pulled off the 'Emperor's New Clothes' effect.

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Dec 2012 18:42:34 GMT
Mr. D. James says:
Thanks for your comment, patrician. Almost as irritating as the novel itself is the hyperbolic nonsense spouted by reviews in 'quality' papers and which are displayed on the book's cover to entice the innocent reader. One sometimes wonders if these reviwers have read any more than the synopsis and maybe a couple of chapters. Whatever has happened to honest penetrating and if necessary punishing criticism. Most of it is just flagrant publisher puffs, totally fraudulent.

In reply to an earlier post on 4 Dec 2012 19:30:04 GMT
Patrician says:
The blurbs from 'quality' journals incline me to pick up a book I'm hesitating over. I,ve tended to take them at face value, & when the book disappoints put it down to differences of taste. But it seems you are right; I trust my judgement enough to know bad writing when I see it. Or in cases like this, a bad book. The last book I read had been praised extravagently & it was awful, mediocre. I did give it a savage review but that fell into an Amazon abyss; presumable because I unthinkingly used a quote from the book containing a four letter word.

In reply to an earlier post on 7 Dec 2012 11:27:45 GMT
Mr. D. James says:
Interesting, that, about Amazon dropping your review. I had the same experience some time back when I gave a negative review of a very bad book. It appeared once, then I found a 'Be the First' invitation from Amazon and my review had been wiped out.

Posted on 2 May 2016 08:09:02 BDT
Only read up to chapter six and I agree with this critique wholeheartedly. The turgid language is annoying and uninspiring. Might give up on this one.
‹ Previous 1 Next ›

Review Details