Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Blind Boys of Alabama Learn more Fitbit
Customer Review

35 of 39 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars A worthy revisit, 20 Nov. 2011
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
This review is from: Quadrophenia (Audio CD)
Touted by many as the last great Who album (I disagree - The Who By Numbers is that one for me) this really must be listened to as a whole to appreciate the amazing work of art that it is. The sheer creativity alone is worth the admission fee. I'm always amazed at how something like this can be created but if you look at the evolution of the Who up to this point you can appreciate how remarkable Pete Townshend had become not only as a songwriter but as a storyteller. Quadrophenia beats Tommy in the respect that it portrays a way of life that was recognisable. Of course, it's not necessary to know the stories behind the creation to appreciate the music. In today's climate of airbrushing, pro-tooling and autotuning it is easy to forget the ability of the musician. Alone they may not be up to much (none of the Who could ever really admit to making a classic solo album although Townshend came close) but put the parts together and you have a potent mixture that quite simply just worked.
We've been here before in terms of releases. The 1996 remaster was remixed. A subtle remix, yes, that certainly lifted elements of the mix that had perhaps been buried due to the style of production of the time. The majority of the Who's catalogue was remixed around this time and although it was done respectfully I was alarmed that they discarded the originals. I have to admit to being worried that the loudness war would strike again and hearing that Jon Astley was in charge also concerned me as he has been responsible for the destruction of several artists' repertoire over the years (Abba, Judas Priest, Boomtown Rats). However it was apparent immediately, as the waves crashed across the stereo spectrum, that the sound was pure. The fact that my volume control could be turned up considerably without having my eardrums shredded was proof that the music has been treated with the respect it needs and deserves and that the listener has been granted the right to choose their own volume level. All credit to Jon Astley for a terrific job. Maximum dynamic range equals maximum enjoyment of the music and how pleasant it is to actually get the feeling of the music instead of having to fight to hear it. Proof that CDs CAN sound good when prepared correctly.
If you're hesitant about buying this as a replacement for the 1996 version then don't be. They actually sound like different albums, both relevant. But this is the purest and best sounding issue ever and the most rewarding to listen to.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews 
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No

[Add comment]
Post a comment
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Amazon will display this name with all your submissions, including reviews and discussion posts. (Learn more)
Name:
Badge:
This badge will be assigned to you and will appear along with your name.
There was an error. Please try again.
Please see the full guidelines here.

Official Comment

As a representative of this product you can post one Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
The following name and badge will be shown with this comment:
 (edit name)
After clicking on the Post button you will be asked to create your public name, which will be shown with all your contributions.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.  Learn more
Otherwise, you can still post a regular comment on this review.

Is this your product?

If you are the author, artist, manufacturer or an official representative of this product, you can post an Official Comment on this review. It will appear immediately below the review wherever it is displayed.   Learn more
 
System timed out

We were unable to verify whether you represent the product. Please try again later, or retry now. Otherwise you can post a regular comment.

Since you previously posted an Official Comment, this comment will appear in the comment section below. You also have the option to edit your Official Comment.   Learn more
The maximum number of Official Comments have been posted. This comment will appear in the comment section below.   Learn more
Prompts for sign-in
  [Cancel]

Comments

Track comments by e-mail
Tracked by 1 customer

Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-10 of 19 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 20 Nov 2011, 15:39:37 GMT
Good review,However with regard to your comment regarding that "No member of the who could ever really admit to making a classic solo album" I agree with you that Townshend came close, But i also feel that Daltrey's "Under a raging moon" is close to being a "Classic solo album", Still i suppose it's all about opinions,Many thanks for your thoughts.

Posted on 22 Nov 2011, 12:51:25 GMT
Levon says:
A fantastic review. I will buy the cd now, thank you.

Posted on 23 Nov 2011, 08:38:54 GMT
Gerald Kraft says:
This review whets my appetite, and if I hadn't already purchased the CD before I read it, I would hurry to the next store RIGHT NOW...
Fun to read, and leaves you with a feeling like after a good conversation.

Posted on 23 Nov 2011, 08:51:23 GMT
J. Milner says:
Thanks for the comments and your interest.

In reply to an earlier post on 23 Nov 2011, 22:19:03 GMT
Marc B says:
This is a remaster of the 96 remix, not the original mix. Other than that a good review.

In reply to an earlier post on 24 Nov 2011, 09:55:37 GMT
J. Milner says:
Are you sure about that?

In reply to an earlier post on 24 Nov 2011, 11:47:16 GMT
Marc B says:
Positive..... It has a new whistle sound added to the start of 5.15, but it's definitely the 96 remix. The 96 remix was missing a few sound affects from the original mix like the seal noise on Dirty Jobs.

In reply to an earlier post on 25 Nov 2011, 04:52:56 GMT
J. Milner says:
Thanks for that Marc. I will amend my review. Must be that the remastering has given it a totally different sound or my mind has a different perception all these years later. The 96 master was pretty good already so I am quite surprised they didn't go back to the original for this version. But, all things considered, this hits the right notes as far as i'm concerned. Only the purists will feel put out.

In reply to an earlier post on 25 Nov 2011, 12:29:22 GMT
Marc B says:
I agree, it's an excellent remaster and in many ways I prefer the remix, although I love the Classic Records vinyl reissue of the original mix. Considering though every Who deluxe edition used the original mixes , I do wonder why they chose not to here.

In reply to an earlier post on 25 Nov 2011, 13:24:22 GMT
J. Milner says:
On one of the reviews for the super deluxe edition one of the comments states that Jon Astley initially worked on the original mix but found it needed too much doing to it to get it sounding right. Perhaps also the thought that the 96 remix did the project more justice - I can certainly accept that.
‹ Previous 1 2 Next ›

Review Details

Item

Reviewer


Location: Hull, UK

Top Reviewer Ranking: 23,897