The debate contrasted two different world views held by two scientists. It was managed very well and fairly. In my opinion Richard Dawkins did not perform very well, relying too much on abusive statements rather than credible evidence. On the other hand, John Lennox, who I had not come across before, presented a very interesting case and did not to resort to ridicule. John Lennox appeared to me to have a more substatial argument than that of Richard Dawkins. Nevetheless, watching this video was time well spent.
One person found this helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?