Learn more Download now Browse your favorite restaurants Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop now Shop now Learn more Learn more Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more

on 6 May 2012
This is the first Edward St Aubyn book I've read, and I could barely put it down; I read it through in two sittings (although it has to be said that its comparatively short.) Its superbly well-written, and throughly enjoyable (and wittily funny at bits) yet there is barely a likeable character in the book. I can hardly wait to read the next book in the "Patrick Melrose" series - which promises to be as entertaining as "Dance to the Music of Time". This first book is all about the characters; not a lot happens yet he still manages to keep you on the edge of your seat. Both of Patrick's parents are so awful (in very different ways) that I can't wait to see how he developes.Vile though most of them are, the characters are highly articulate and the language of the book is a joy. Highly recommended.
15 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
VINE VOICEon 24 July 2012
Is David Melrose the most obnoxious character in fiction? If not, then he must be in the top ten. Melrose is the father of Patrick, the subject of five of St Aubin's novels, novels which are semi autobiographical. Arrogant, amoral, controlling he has an unaccountable hold over his wife and friends. Nor is Melrose alone in his obnoxiousness. The novel is set over the course of a day in which two other couples will attend a dinner party with Melrose and his rich, alcoholic wife and none of them are particularly pleasing.

When I started this book I wondered whether I would be able to finish it as I found the characters (apart from Patrick) so horrible. If they weren't snobbish and arrogant they were foolish, vain and empty headed. Their milieu is not one with which I am familiar as (like most people) I don't spend my time mixing with minor aristocracy and their pursuits seemed vacuous to me. But I persevered and I'm glad I did. This is a compelling novel, which is beautifully written and in spite of my initial reservations I found that I really wanted to find out what happens next.

Once again, Kindle and Amazon's daily deal have come up trumps and I have discovered an amazing writer who was previously unknown to me. A masterpiece of writing.
9 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 16 October 2014
One imagines that purchasers of this book will have a good idea about its emotionally painful content. That, however, would be to put it mildly. Don't make the mistake (as I did) of reading it on a train unless you're okay about weeping in front of startled commuters. You'll want to enter the book and rescue the poor little blighter.

Unlike Alan Hollinghurst's work, with which comparisons are often drawn, it's beautifully written but not "beautifully written". That's a good thing - for this reader, at least.

If I have one criticism it's that the thoughts of the child often seem to be more the thoughts of the author as a man.

I've yet to decide whether to read the whole "Patrick Melrose" cycle. The suffering of the boy is so painful and the adults, almost without exception, are monsters. I've had the misfortune to meet such creatures from time to time. You want to take a long, hot shower after being in their company. Poor little Patrick doesn't have that luxury and I'm not sure I have the courage to go in again, when I know I can't pick him up and run away.
3 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 4 March 2016
I didn't enjoy this book as much as the reviews indicated that I might. Perhaps I was expecting it to be something other than it was. I have given it two stars because I did read on and finish the book and did find some aspects of it well written. But, for me, it didn't seem to go anywhere and the content was depressing and occasionally seemed to revel in its nastiness. It is possibly just paving the way for the later novels and perhaps they are less wallowing - half of me wants to read one to see, but the other half doesn't want to risk it after having been left with a bitter aftertaste from the first. But all the positive reviews from other people do make me wonder whether I am missing something.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 17 September 2012
A truly horrible cast of characters make their appearance in this first of five novels that trace the life journey of Patrick Melrose.

Here we are introduced to Patrick as a scared and lonely five year old trying desperately to stay out of the way of his sadistic father David, while at the same time desperately seeking attention from his mother, who is herself too busy seeking refuge from the horrors of her husband by using a cocktail of alcohol and prescription medication.

The action in this slim, first novel centres on a single weekend in the family's Provence home, and the arrival of guests equally odious and disfunctional as the Melrose's themselves. The snivelling social climbing of the majority of these guests and the vicious and malicious conversational repartee to outdo others and impress David Melrose is beyond me. David who had to marry for money, who is the product of a dysfunctional upbringing himself and a failed doctor, seems to command respect from these acolytes, but I expect its more respect from fear of not towing his line than anything else!

I AM interested to learn if Patrick manages to overcome this awful introduction to life and so will probably read the other novels in the series, especially if I can get them at a reduced price as I did with this one.. it being a Kindle Daily Deal purchase for me.
3 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 10 April 2018
St Aubyn cuts down to the bone, saws it open and dissects the marrow of his characters. I don't feel like I have ever read anything quite like it where morally repugnant characters are drawn in such a deft, merciless and somehow still empathetic way. Where you can't help but hate them while still recognising their humanity. I feel like this is a book I will be thinking about for a long time.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 23 March 2015
St. Aubyn is a superb, elegant prose writer - one of those writers indeed whose books, though relatively short, take a disproportionate time to read as one savours each perfectly weighted sentence - and the story of Patrick Melrose as it unfolds over the - now four - series of books is immaculately told and psychologically very astute, as we see Patrick's equally damaged father proceed to wreak havoc on his hapless son who then struggles to achieve adulthood or adult relationships. Original sin indeed. Oh, the books are also mordantly funny.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 21 May 2014
although this is well written and conveys a haunting picture of a little boy abandoned amidst the mostly ghastly characters who inhabit his world and the book Ultimately, this makes it very difficult to recommend wholeheartedly. It is hard to fully enjoy a work when there is not a single likeable person in the book and ultimately, I did not care about any of it to read the next two books in the trilogy which is unusual for me not to carry on with the series - Clever and a bit facetious with not enough humour or poignancy to leaven the dense mixture.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 6 March 2014
Very readable from the first paragraph. Well written, darkly humorous (with the emphasis on darkly), I read most of this on a journey to/from London (approx. 5 hours)

I have to say, I do love to read about dysfunctional families (they make mine look 'normal') and I'm aware some folk find that sort of thing too close to home. But if you take pleasure in watching things fall apart from the sidelines and enjoy British idiosycrasies, please give 'Never Mind' a go. I'm looking forward to tucking into the next in the series very much indeed.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 15 August 2014
I give this two stars only because it is, in a technical sense, well written. The prose style is good. The big problem I had with the book is that it all like a much inferior version of the kind of novel Evelyn Waugh used to write. I found myself, throughout the book, noticing scenes that Waugh would have handled so much better. This is not counterbalanced by anything that St Aubyn does that Waugh didn't do.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse

Questions? Get fast answers from reviewers

Please make sure that you've entered a valid question. You can edit your question or post anyway.
Please enter a question.

Need customer service? Click here