Top critical review
One person found this helpful
on 2 November 2015
The reason that I have given this narrative 3 stars is simply that, on a subject that is highly controversial, this book simply isn't. It's bland.
Yes it goes through all that's probable/possible/likely etc., but it doesn't (and cannot) answer the question stated in the title anymore than anyone else can. It's main saving grace is that it doesn't make statements of 'fact' (which are not and cannot be proven) whereas some other so called historians do.