Shop now Shop now Shop now See more Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Learn more Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen with Prime Learn more Shop Men's Shop Women's

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 7 October 2013
This book draws on new material from Alice Kober's archive, only recently catalogued, to present an overdue reevaluation of her life and work - which led to a much increased understanding of the structure of Linear B. It is only a pity that Fox found it necessary in doing so to score cheap points against the person who eventually completed the decypherment, Michael Ventris.

The book makes the valid point that some of the fundamental work presented (in Chadwick's book) as if Ventris originated it, in fact first appeared in print in a seminal 1948 methods paper by Kober (notably the use of the two dimensional syllabic grid, set out by Kober 3 years before the critical Ventris worknote of 1951). But I do not like her amateur psychologist's attempt to "prove" that Ventris committed suicide, a suggestion with little real evidence. Nor - for example - the claim that Ventris deserves no credit for interpreting the "button" sign: Kober never published her findings on this, and there is no evidence that Ventris plagiarised her work or was even aware of it. We would not suddenly deny Einstein credit for relativity if it were discovered that an unpublished MSS anticipating it by 10 years lurked in the Willard Gibbs archives. A small point, but symptomatic of a bias that leaves a nasty taste in the mouth. Kober does not need this: the facts are striking enough without journalistic exaggeration.

One more quibble: the page layout with double spacing and large print means you are getting much less for your money than meets the eye: at a rough estimate about 190 pages (main text, absent footnotes etc) of normal printing, not much more than in Chadwick's brief account of the decypherment. And of this, the first and last "books" are largely padding: good accounts of the work of Evans and of Ventris have appeared elsewhere. That said, Fox does give a good account of Ventris' decipherment: her linguist's training comes out in the very clear explanation of how he achieved this. In my view, her account is at least the equal of that of Chadwick, in his book on the decipherment.

A couple more criticisms, though rather marginal. Fox quotes an estimate by Shelmerdine of the combined population of the "Mycenaeanized" bronze age communities in the Greek world at about 50,000. M.I. Finley estimated the total at an even smaller level, possibly just a few thousand, with each community containing "several hundred" individuals. However, John Chadwick, who spent years working on the Linear B tablets from just one community, that of Pylos, estimated the population of that one kingdom on its own as "at least" 50,000, an estimate supported by other scholars. Chadwick's work was based on actual totals given for specific trades and groups of people in the kingdom of Pylos, including for example 400 bronzesmiths, and adding them together, with inevitably some assumptions.

I am no expert but Chadwick's methodology seems reliable, and in that case the total population of the Mycenaean world must have been considerably more than 50,000. I'm wondering if Shelmerdine in fact agreed with Chadwick's estimate, and her number referred to the population of Pylos alone: I don't have access to her book so can't check it. In any event, given the scale of the Mycenaean settlements and what we can deduce from the extent of their trade (eg the ubiquity of the characteristic stirrup jars) suggests that a total overall population of 50,000 is absurdly small.

Lastly, and perhaps this is a pedantic objection, but Fox twice tells us that Chinese is a logographic language, in which each ideogram is essentially a picture of what it represents: each symbol stands for a separate word, or concept. This is distinguished from syllabic languages in which the symbols represent sounds.

Technically Chinese is indeed a logographic language, but Fox's description of it is not of a "logographic" but of an "ideographic" language. The statement that Chinese is ideographic, and that the written symbols convey their semantic content directly, is a long-standing fallacy, repeated endlessly by people who have never studied the language; as a qualified linguist, Fox should have got this right, or at least consulted someone familiar with Chinese. Firstly, the majority of Chinese words are composed of two (or occasionally more) characters, not one character. For example, huo che for train, guo jia for country. But more fundamentally, the great majority of Chinese characters are composed of two parts, squashed together as it were, a radical and a phonetic element. The radical serves as a kind of determinative, but most of the information content is represented by the phonetic element.

Enough said about that: if you don't believe me, go and read a good account of the matter (eg of how the phonetic value is based on Shang dynasty pronunciation, so a character's phonetic element is only a partial guide to its sound in modern Chinese, etc etc; as always, there are endless complications. I still bear the scars of learning this language). Ironically, Andrew Robinson's book "The Story of Writing" cited by Fox makes this point very forcefully and clearly, showing clearly that Fox has not read it all through! This will not surprise anyone familiar with the habits of writers (including academic writers) but it is a bit of a give-away.

But all this is secondary. The main reason for reading this book would be to get access to the new material, and to enjoy a much overdue and much merited acknowledgement of Kober's immense, original work, which makes this book essential reading for anyone interested in the area, despite all the flaws in Fox's presentation. Even if you do not want to pay the rather excessive bookshop price to buy it yourself, get it via your college library or local public library as I did, and help put the record straight over Alice Kober, a woman who, if anyone ever did, gave too much and died as a result of overwork and stress and sheer dedication to the quest for truth. A real heroine of our time.
11 comment| 25 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 30 November 2013
Quite interesting... although I have the feeling that the author is a bit biased with one of the three protagonists: Alice Kober who happens to be an American female scholar... more or less like the author... So, I have perceived a sense of distortion in telling the facts. On the other hand, my guts say that the other two ones were really the hand (Arthur Evans) and the mind (Michael Ventris) of the decipherment: both British guys... And I am Italian so I am not biased by nationality... Anyhow a great book I truly recommend to anyone willing to go to Crete and to better understand the story of the island.
0Comment| 13 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 19 August 2013
I visit Knossos and Mycenae regularly, leading tours. In the little museum at Mycenae (and the grander one in Heraklion) we look at the 'shopping lists' of Linear B, the itemizations of cattle, grain, olive flasks, wine . . . This book gives the best overview of the translation of the Linear B tablets I have ever seen, and is written like a thrilling detective story. No dry history tome, this! And it gives credit to the hardworking American lady who laid the groundwork, painstakingly, to their decipherment. I read it on Kindle. I'm now buying it for some of my Greek friends in paperback so they, too, can share the discoveries . . .
0Comment| 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 28 August 2013
The deciphering of the Minoan tablets spanned 50 years, and required obsessive effort by the chief amateur codebreakers. In both cases, the effort was costly, and the human stories behind the decoding are vividly portrayed. I would have liked to have seen more examples of the tablets, with their decoded messages since the story of the people whose lives were recorded is astounding.
22 comments| 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 21 January 2014
Don't be put off by the academic nature of this book. Margalit Fox turns the cracking of an ancient code into a cracking story. Meet Alice Kober - and why haven't we met her before? What a towering intellect, what a scholar. She worked day and night to translate a language with no reference. And she did. If someone explained this book to me I would never have read it - probably because it sounds a bit dull. But I am so glad I did.
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 10 September 2014
I am pleased that, at last, Alice Kober has been given her due in the deciphering of Linear B. I much enjoyed reading it. However, I cannot recommend this book in its Kindle form. The diagrams are too small and it is impossible to page backwards and forwards as one needs to do. Better to go for the print version
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 17 September 2013
I chose this book after reading an article in the Guardian. It is a wonderful non-fiction book that feels almost like a detective novel. Grounding itself in facts the author manages to build a gripping story of the three people responsible in the deciphering of Linear B. Sometimes heart breaking, but never slips into sentimentality. This book actually convinced me to go to Crete and to see the ancient sites described in the book and want to learn more about the anicent people that were way beyond their peers 4000 years ago.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 27 September 2013
A beautiful written book about the discovery and (50 years later) deciphering of the Minoan Linear B language, The book really makes you think about language in spoken and written form. A language may be spoken but that does not mean to say it is has a written form. If a written form is found, what does it mean and how did it sound.? Does it run left to right or right to left? is it logographic (one symbol means a whole word), syllabic or like English, alphabetic? How do you find all this out.? A wonderful book
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 5 September 2013
Read this book because I knew 'zilch' on the matter and it intrigued me. The book is split into 3 parts each of which deals with one the 3 characters connected with cracking the code. The author concentrates (and favours the 2nd) whom she feels has not received the attention that she deserves (echoes of the DNA code). I found the characters more interesting than the code (which turns out to be stockroom inventory) and which proves that when it comes to academic disputes Brutus does not get a look in!
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 December 2014
Although this book focueeses on Alice Kober's contribution to the decipherment of Linear B script it also covers off both Arthur Evans and Michael Ventris and, at the end, also provides a description of what we have learned from the texts. As such it is a must read for anyone wanting to understand something about the decipherment.
The kindle book suffered terribly from the practice of embedding bitmapped graphics into the text. As these are often so gle characters they were often completely inaccessible, nor do they scale with the text. Kindle desperately needs a menu option to lie all of the bitmaps on a page or else to have a bitmap magnifying glass of some kind.
Anyway, I digress. Although I would recommend this book as a quick study of the decipherment and of Kober's contribution in particular it is not a great read and failed to provide a good insight into enough of the intellectual process involved in the decipherment.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)