Learn more Download now Shop now Shop now flip flip flip Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more

TOP 500 REVIEWERon 18 May 2016
This is a very attractive, lively and often colloquial history of art from the Pre-Impressionists (Delacroix, Courbet) to the present time. In this story Gompertz always tells us what artists were trying to do. It is fairly well known what the Impressionists and Expressionists were trying to do, but many people find it difficult to articulate what exactly the Cubists and then abstract or conceptual artists were aiming at. Gompertz is a genial guide to an INTELLECTUAL understanding - though whether, as a result, the reader’s AESTHETIC response is enhanced is of course another matter. The question that some people have about, say, Carl Andre’s “Equivalent VIII” (his arrangement of 120 bricks), about Malevich’s “Black Square” or about Tracey Emin’s “My Bed” - “but is it Art? (with a capital A)” - doesn’t really go away, for all Gompertz’s demonstration that that question had been asked in the early days about many innovations which by now has been answered with an indubitable “yes”. In the later chapters, dealing with the more recent decades, he certainly goes along with his quotation from Allan Kaprow: “Art doesn’t have to look like art to be art”. Nothing is too zany to be considered art - including, as just one example, Yves Klein covering female nudes in wet blue paint and then instructing them to press themselves against a wall covered in paper to create whatever images would result. Gompertz gives us his own aesthetic - not just his intellectual - response to most of them.

I have been teaching the history of art for many years, but I found much new information and many new angles in this book, beginning with the introductory chapter in which Gompertz shows us the meanings and intentions of Duchamp’s ready-made urinal which he had signed “R.Mutt 1917" and called “Fountain”.

After that, the treatment is largely, but not exclusively chronological, though not exclusively so, since he repeatedly shows the influence that a particular art form has had not only on later artists, but on everyday objects and advertising to the present day.

And on architecture: the chapter on Mondrian’s “Neo-Plasticism” is followed by one on American sky-scrapers before bringing us to the Bauhaus (which he links with the PHILOSOPHY of William Morris - however unModernist the products of the Morris workshop were), and it is really odd to see that some of the early leading contributors to the Bauhaus Modernist style originally came from German Expressionism.

His chapter on Dadaism makes some sense out of their nonsense, and shows both its roots in earlier art (Picasso’s collage paintings) and its influence in later “installation art”.

Gompertz analyzes many paintings, only a few of which could be reproduced in the book; many others will not be known to most readers. Ideally you should read this book, as I did, sitting in front of a computer to call the works up on Google Images: without them, his verbal descriptions of them cannot possibly convey what they look like.

This is a very personal book. He is clearly a huge admirer of Jackson Pollock and Willem de Koning, his enthusiastic response going far beyond describing the aims and the abstract works of these painters. And of Anthony Caro’s red-painted metal construction called “Early One Morning” he writes, “It has the delicacy and poise of a ballerina, the resonance of a hymn and the tenderness of a kiss.” H’m.

The book also has Gompertz’s reflections on the role of art galleries, on the art market and on fashion. Whenever a modern work is shown by a Saatchi, a Gagosian or a Jopling, it instantly becomes an endorsement that what is being shown is Art, and enables quite a number of their protegés to become wealthy way beyond what all but a tiny number of artists have been in the past, as billionaires buy their works (often as an investment). Gompertz is fully aware of all this; but he sees real artistic merit in their works. For them to be considered as works of art, they do not have to do anything with aesthetics - they may, as he says about the work of Murakami, be “on one level juvenile and inane”, or, about Koons, that they are “super-saucy” (i.e. pornographic), or they may be three photographs of Ai Weiwei dropping a Han dynasty urn - as long as our study of them can decode - (and it sometimes needs a lot of knowledgeable decoding) - that they are saying something about their makers’ view of the world or of their environment.

It will be apparent from this review that I am one of those old-fashioned stick-in-the-muds who believes that, while all art originates in concepts, mere concepts are not enough. So I don’t share all of Gompertz’s judgments or those of Saatchi and Co; but I do think this is a brilliant book not pictorially interesting , giving pleasure and provoking thought on almost every page.
11 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 26 May 2018
What a fun read ! if you read this book, you will understand... for an example, if you see a painting but you dont understand why this painting is popluar or famous, this book tell you why...
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 4 June 2016
Sometimes the deconstructions are a bit over the top.... but it does what is says on the cover. Could be called "What on earth is that". I like his idea of the noughties being the generation of "Entrepreneurial" art... art/money/exhibitions/Modern art galleries as entertainment. We are a long way from Raphael

Would have liked a bit more on (my fav) Mondriaan.

What about Lichenstein's obsession with cartoon representation of light/tears/mirrors/explaosions
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 6 December 2016
The author has a most down-to-earth approach to interpreting modern art. He focuses on the stories of artists and more brilliantly, the connections between each artist / the period which they represent - how one influenced another, leading to the next "ism". Most incredible story-telling and most articulate interpretations - almost a novel of the art world!
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 30 October 2016
Still reading this book but it's an easy informative book and is giving me an insight to modern art and its origins, which is what I was looking for.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 17 November 2015
Ideal,for people wanting to understand modern art while not necessarily actually liking it.....but willing to change their opinion. Briskly paced, easy to read and written with humour as well as bags of information.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 3 January 2017
Clearly written and makes modern art approachable and engaging. I wish there was a copy that included all the art mentioned instead of the few examples given. Keep your laptop beside you and google images as you go!
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 23 May 2016
Excellent introduction to a non artist. Makes it easy to understand what an artist was aiming for and outs it in historical context.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 29 January 2016
Explains art history in a simple and entertaining way. Loved it!
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 30 June 2014
If you are curious about or interested in modern art this is a book you will devour. It's witty, anecdotal and erudite approach is very engaging. It's like reading a series of very well written magazine articles. Marvellous.This book entertains, educates and will possibly make you want to look at certain artists work a second time. You may not agree with everything in it (I still can't see the aesthetic value of that red monstrosity by Anthony Caro) but you will enjoy the way it is passionate about it's subject.
|0Comment|Report abuse