Top critical review
2 people found this helpful
Not a £50 Mouse
on 11 April 2014
I bought this elsewhere while it was reduced to £24 and I very nearly sent it back because of the 'plasticky' feel it has. What stopped me was the shape and comfort of the design. Also the performance is actually very good and accurate for my limited needs (not a prolific gamer). I actually value it's attributes elsewhere.
It looks good and all, but not as good as the rubberised version, so why did I choose the 'gloss' version? Rubberised finishes don't last and become a mess over time, particularly something that gets handled a lot, and a mouse does, a gaming mouse gets lots of sweaty abuse.
Size wise it's on the smaller side and suitable for claw grip lovers. Anyone looking to replace a Razer Diamondback 3g (like me) could do worse than trying it out. It's not a million miles off dimension wise. Bit of re-training needed for the right side buttons so you don't accidentally click them but once I zeroed in on the correct holding position I was fine.
So in short; good performing mouse if the size is right for you but at half the price.