Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Learn More Shop Women's Shop Men's

Customer Reviews

4.5 out of 5 stars
4.5 out of 5 stars
Format: DVD|Change
Price:£4.99+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 16 January 2012
I actually watched this quite randomly when I saw if being shown on Sky Movies. I didn't expect to like it but I actually LOVED it! I really enjoyed it. I think all the actors were perfect for their roles. The 'children' are slightly older then in Peter Pan 2003, but I think it's better. And I think Charlie Rowe makes a perfect Peter Pan! I was really impressed and have watched it multiple times since, I really hope they go on to recreate Peter Pan and even Peter Pan Returns to Neverland with these actors and the storyline. I'd definitely recommend anyone and everyone to watch it! :D
33 Comments| 28 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 6 February 2017
A very good and well thought out version of Neverland, entertaining, superb graphics with a natural look to them the mountains trees oceans and sky's .It is fair to say that sky produced an excellent programme for family entertainment.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
This is the 'tale' that 'J .M.Barrie' never got around to writing, explaining how the character's we find throughout his 'Peter Pan' become part of the enchanting tale.
I believe 'Mr Barrie' would have approved.
It's 1906 in 'london' 'James Hook' (Rhys Ifans) is looked upon by 'Peter' (Charlie Rowe) and his pals as a father figure, in truth 'Jimmy' as 'Hook' is known by....uses the lads in the same way that 'fagan' does in the 'Oliver Twist' story.
'Jimmy' plans a robbery at a jewlers, he seeks a mystery 'orb'
The 'orb' has the power to transfer those who strike it into a different galaxy, to a distant planet where you never grow older, an enchanting and wonderful planet.......Neverland.
Like the 'Peter Pan' story, this is every childs dream, living in a land of adventure, and as a child, you never grow up.
this is a pretty good stab at presenting a prequel to 'j.m.barrie's' timeless tale.
The film perhaps a little darker than the 'Peter Pan' films we know.
Also Starring in this TV-Mini-Series,,,,'Keira Knightley' (Tinker-Bell 2-episodes) ''Anna Friel' (Elizabeth Bonny 2-episodes)
and the late-great 'Bob Hoskins' (Mr Smee)
If you want to see how the characters came to be in 'Neverland' this is a pretty decent attempt at solving the mystery.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 22 February 2012
I loved this film when I watched it, the acting is great and the storyline is great, I would recommend it to anyone!! :D
0Comment| 12 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
How Neverland came to be. This two part television version tells of an island created by Elizabeth I's alchemist (Charles Dance), Tinkerbell in a glass globe acting as a portal. Amongst those involved are Anna Friel as a flamboyant eighteenth century pirate queen and Charlie Rowe as Peter, heading a gang of Edwardian urchins. Their mentor is disgraced aristocrat Jimmy (Rhys Ifans), he to evolve into their Enemy No.1.

All this sounds gloriously inventive. Surely a treat is assured with such illustrious names on board (especially with Bob Hoskins again as Smee). Glowing reviews tempted me to buy, I looking forward to being most royally entertained. Instead there came considerable disappointment.

Here is yet another example of how vital it is to have a strong script upon which to build. This is a mishmash. From start to finish much seems awkwardly cobbled together, bewildering leaps in the plot suggesting savage editing. A clue why this is so appears in one of the bonuses on Disc 2. The director speaks of a four hour long film. What we in fact have is well under three.

Amongst assets are some performances and many special effects. An interesting bonus tells how some of the latter were achieved, green screen much in evidence. It fascinates to see how ingeniously everything becomes transformed. In interviews cast members enthuse about their roles and look forward to the finished version.

This attempt to produce a meaningful, spectacular variation on the Peter Pan story has inspired mixed reactions. Mainly they are favourable. Sadly it simply did not work for me, the whole enterprise needing more focus and a firmer hand.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 27 August 2016
I bought this for my 6 year old daughter who is a big neverland / peter pan fan. I personally thought it was okay,however she loves it and has watched it a few times.its basically the story off how peter pan and hook came to be. Its in 2 sections but does have the option to play both so keeps them occupied for quite a while. Would recommend for any child that likes peter pan
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
The SyFy Channel has been doing "reimaginings" of classic public-domain books for the past few years, such as "Tin Man" or "Alice." But "Neverland" is a little different. Rather than reimagining the tale of Peter Pan, this miniseries presents the story of how a street urchin became the flying boy who never grows up, and the beginning of his war with Captain Hook.

In 1906, the fallen arisocrat James "Jimmy" Hook (Rhys Ifans) has collected a gang of young boys who steal things for him, lead by the impish Peter Pan (Charlie Rowe). But when Jimmy and the gang vanish, Peter must use a mysterious black orb to travel into a wholly alien world -- Neverland. In this world, there are silver faeries, a pirate ship, and a lost tribe of Indians.

The pirate captain Elizabeth Bonny (Anna Friel) quickly fascinates Jimmy, especially when she reveals that the fairies have magical dust that allows flight. Peter is horrified by his father figure's betrayal, especially when the pirates kill one of the boys. His only goal is to get back to London, and the only way he knows how is to seek out a hooded man who appears in his dreams with the black orb.

With the help of Aaya (aka Tiger Lily) (Q'orianka Kilcher), Peter ventures into a strange lost city, where he discovers the truth about Neverland. But when the pirates attack and capture the boys and Aaya, Peter must use his newfound powers to save them and defeat Captain Hook...

J.M. Barrie didn't really go into the background of Peter Pan in his original novel -- Peter Pan just sort of EXISTED, like a nature sprite or some forgotten deity. But "Neverland" does do a decent job trying to spin up a backstory for Peter and Captain Hook -- it tries to explain the battle between Hook and Peter, what Neverland is, and how pirates and Indians got to it.

And there is a really whimsical, fantastical air to the story -- silver faeries, fallen comets, eight-legged crocodiles, an orb, and a vast city made of woven trees.. The giant white CGI trees are kind of goofy, though.

But the movie also uses its length to establish the bond between Peter and Hook, which is a genuine connection of father/son love and trust that is corrupted by greed and cruelty. Rowe reminds me of a younger, more expressive Daniel Radcliffe, and Ifans is absolutely brilliant as a complex man who is both cruel and kind, compassionate and utterly ruthless.

And it has a solid cast, with Anna Friel as a cold-heart swashbuckler, Bob Hoskins as Smee, and a bunch of pretty talented kids as the Lost Boys. The one problem is Kilcher, who is so wooden you could saw her into logs, but she's balanced out by a more realistic, well-rounded depiction of the Indians ("Dinner." "You're going to eat us?" "Why, do you taste good?") as shown by Raoul Trujillo and George Aguilar.

"Neverland" is a pretty decent what-if tale about the origins of Peter Pan, which does a fairly good job at explaining Neverland without robbing it of magic. Not the best classic-based miniseries, but a good one.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 20 June 2015
A different tale of Peter Pan. More the pre runner as it shows Peter as a thief in London and Hook is his master. Before Hook lost his hand and became a pirate. Lots of magic and lovely scenery. A good swashbuckling film. Recommended to adults and kids alike.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 7 June 2012
I said I would take down my original review and post another one upon a second viewing of this mini series,so here it is,as Ive just watched it for a second time.

I can still only give it a three star rating,because that is all I think it is worth,but at least I can now put my finger on what I think went wrong in my oppinion,instead of just saying something did but not knowing what.And what went wrong was behind the camera,not infront of it,infact it was up in the boardroom.Everything about this mini series was clearly decided by a committee,so as to ensure maximum appeal to a certain age group and demographic,from the casting down to the costumes.Its like painting by numbers,the finished result may look like the real thing,but its just an empty copy.In my previous review I said I found the whole thing a bit bland,and I still do,but least I can now say why.When you make something based on graphs and charts,you rob it of any originality,it becomes mass produced,and like everything that has gone before.

If your wanting something to watch as a family,or to keep the kids happy for a few hours,you wont go far wrong with this,its okay viewing,and perfectly safe,but you will have seen it all before.Yet it could have been so much better,because it had the potential.As I said before there are some good performances,its reasonably paced and some of the sets are very striking.Its as if in this department it found a way of showing off what it could have really done.A shame but there you go,when you make everything to a formula,the end result is something thats like everything else,and doesnt stand out.And for me the one thing Neverland does is blend into the background.

Sorry folks,I know my previous review wasnt popular,but at least now Ive fully explained my reasons why Im not that keen on this.
33 Comments| 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 21 June 2014
Here's a two part TV Miniseries that details the origins of Peter Pan, the Lost Boys and Captain Hook, here starting out as a gang of London thieves, with 'Jimmy' Hook a fencing instructor and ex-socialite. One day, sent out by a mysterious client, the group come upon a magic orb, which ends up transporting them to, where else, Neverland. Of course, this isn't the first time the orb has brought people to Neverland, as the group soon discover both a Native American tribe and a band of Pirates. Loyalties are tested and promises broken as Hook and Peter's once strong bond is gradually shattered.

Too compressed and often in a hurry, 'Neverland' is never outright boring, mainly thanks to a terrific cast, but it squanders them and its premise with indecisive, clunky storytelling and a lack of charm or humour. Writer-Director Nick Willing assembles a lot of great ideas (having Hook and Peter being friends in a pseudo-paternal relationship, exploring the nature & history of Neverland, seeing Hook's downfall and temptation to evil, the ever present fears of death and growing up, much lie the original take) but is also trying to balance them out with action setpieces and a number of auxillary subplots (including one involving a secret society and alchemy, another involving the fairies and their city, yet another involving the pirates trying to take over the fairies and steal their magic, leading to yet another 'RULE THE WORLD' plot complete with bloated monologues) and well, you can already see what's wrong.

Despite the generous two and a half hour runtime, the series is in such a rush to do everything that a lot of ideas feel half baked, and are not allowed a full resolution. The first episode in particular has enough material and plot threads to last two or three episodes of a longer miniseries. Heck, for a supposed 'prequel', there are a number of inconsistencies and errors that don't quite match up with the original take (Peter's memory is finicky but intact, Tinkerbell is a little too wise and ultimately, how Peter travels without the orb in the end is never explained.) And the mediocre action, complete with crash zooms to make it more 'intense', and lax CGI, even by TV standards, don't exactly help matters either.

A real shame as the cast here are quite solid. We have a decent selection of child actors, with Charlie Rowe doing a fairly good job as the mischievous yet charismatic Peter (though he almost never shuts up during the first episode and Willing keeps giving him exposition to say). However, this is very much Rhys Ifans' show as Hook, and he absolutely nails; by turns tragic, lovable and threatening, Ifans commands the screen everytime he's on. Supporting them are the likes of Anna Friel as Captain Elizabeth Bonny, Charles Dance as the alchemist, Q'orianka Kilcher as Aaya (Tiger Lilly) and Charlotte Atkinson/Kiera Knightley as Tinker Bell, body and voice respectively. They are all good, but don't get a whole lot to do, with Dance relegated mainly to exposition about Neverland and the orb. Oh, and Bob Hoskins is back as Smee, but he is wasted with no real material to work with.

In the end, 'Neverland' isn't awful television, but it is really pedestrian and ultimately, disappointing. Everything here was assembled to make it work, and yet, a muddled script that tries to do so much with so little time just leads to a great big mess. Say what you wish about 'Hook', at least it had charm and knew what it wanted to be. This doesn't, and that's just a real shame.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Customers also viewed these items


Need customer service? Click here