Top critical review
watch carl sagan's cosmos instead - that is like poetry
on 6 June 2016
This series is disappointing because it is less interesting than carl sagan's cosmos of thirty years ago and
you would expect the tv people to have improved on cosmos by now. Also Brian Cox makes statements that simply have no
scientific evidence for them. He says for example that the universe gets cold and stays like that forever but we cant know this when there is still
10 times more mass than has been found to be accounted for -and that's just in our galaxy( or a theory explaining why it doesn't need to be be found),and we don't really know what mass is yet or else we'd be able to predict particle masses-the nobel prize wining physicist Richard Feynman said that he found this "worrying" i.e he thought modern physics was fundamentally flawed and Stephen hawking said the Higgs particle -which is supposed to explain mass-was "disappointing" .Before Cox makes such bold statements he should win himself a nobel prize first and prove his credentials. For me he is david Attenborough without charm or credibility. Take the pretty photography away from his programs and there isn't much left.