Learn more Download now Shop now Shop now flip flip flip Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more

VINE VOICEon 22 October 2008
This book is for those of you who like history as a sweep of events and with interlocking sections that you have to piece together to get your overall picture. Although this makes reference to the current election I think its only because I think the author sees the two candidates as potentially the Hamilton and Jefferson characters of this age - one quite happy to use American military strength and the other very sey against it. And its this split in the US approach that the four sections of the book address. The four sections cover war, religion , what is an american, and the belief you can have it all if you just try hard enough and while I don;t think you get a full final view I think the observation at the end that the role of government is about making people happy and not to destroy life is hard to argue with.
Apart from the violence of the Civil War which had some horrific parts what these sections bring to vivid life in the internal violence in US history , the programs against the Cherokee, the violence and hatred against the black population as they battled for civil rights, the mis tratment of Chinese and Mexicans and they were killed with impunity and with legal sanction makes for some grim reading. The section on religion makes it very clear why religion plays such a big part in US politics and you can see why as it was and till is a vital way to express a sense of community. The best part for me was the section on multiculturalism where its clear that you can retain a sense of your roots in the US AND still be an American with a fierce committment to the country
It was with a sense of diappointment that I finished this book simply bacause I had not had enough of the American story which is spite of the things done still seems essentially optimistic - and so if Obama wants to use the phase 'Yes we can' then this book will help explain why his audience responds to it
77 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
VINE VOICEon 26 July 2009
If you want to understand the USA, this book is for you. It is not a conventional chronological history: Shama's approach is thematic, with sections on war, religion, immigration and the myth of plenty, interwoven with personal observations about America today. He also vividly focuses on the lives of some not-so-famous individuals who are also fascinating embodiments of aspects of this very complex country. Highly recommended.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 15 April 2017
This book was topical when it was written in 2008, when Obama was running for the Presidency. Now that we live in the post Trump era, it seems strangely out of time. However, there are some fascinating and deliciously ironic stories. For example the story of how the Mexicans tried to ban American immigration into Texas in the 1820s and '30s, and of how the Americans tried to restrict Chinese immigration into California and the West in the final decades of the 19th century.

Simon Schama is billed here as the 'master story-teller'; but, on the basis of this book, the question remains as to whether he is more of a journalist than a historian. He tells the tale; but does he really explain anything beyond the tale?
2 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 2 May 2013
This book is NOT for the general reader. Every 10th word is one I do not know. The book assumes a lot of prior knowledge, and not just basic knowledge, it assumes a serious and detailed knowledge of US history, this could be read as an embellishment/deeper understanding of reasons behind things. However it jumps around the centuries and misses out huge important chunks of important stuff. It goes into massive amounts of detail on certain points and no detail or mention of others.
Reading this book reminds me of some of my Cambridge University lectures - utterly incomprehensible but no one dares to admit it. Undoubtedly Schama is an academic expert but has no ability to write for the general reader, so do not believe those reviews who say it is.
It's impossible to get an idea of what happened when. It's like he's talking to a bunch of other academics and uses lots of clever clever shorthand references to other stuff that leave most folks feeling thick. I hated the few chapters I read and felt a huge relief when I left it in a cafe.
5 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 24 July 2009
Simon Schama provides a detailed account of the development of society in the USA. He provides detail of how today's American social and political beliefs developed and how the race for the 2008 presidential nomination is the culmination of 200 years of growth. A readable page turner of interest to anyone with curiosity.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 15 December 2014
I will never know the excellent ideas the author has because of a ratio of seventeen pages of irrelevant, flowery language per nugget of interest. This book was a waste of money for my reading style.

I would recommend against this in BOOK format for this reason. I imagine that the subject matter is excellent and the video is top whack :-)
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 3 December 2012
Nobody writes history quite like Simon Schama:

"But when you stepped through the bails of scratchy tumbleweed that had come to rest against the broken fence you could see the place was held together by nothing more than the debris of its own ruin; the splintered wreck of a life that was hanging on in the middle of nowhere, so its reproach would endure against the Colorado sky like someone who wouldn't or couldn't stop crying."

Like most people, I assume, I first became aware of Simon Schama when I watched his seminal BBC series A History of Britain way back in 2000. But it wasn't until university that I started paying attention to him as a literary stylist, when a lecturer told me (with all the histrionic hand gestures and unintentional spitting of the enthused academic) that the moment Simon Schama decided to write history instead of fiction marked a terrible loss to the modern novel. I took this gauche statement for all the unqualified hyperbole it so obviously is but, apparently, there was indeed such a "moment" as my supervisor described. In Schama's quasi-autobiographical book of essays Scribble, Scribble, Scribble he writes:

"I made my choice albeit with some torment. I was a History Boy. Hector [Schama's English master] took it badly, as if betrayed, and barely spoke to me for months. Many years later I told him that much of the rest of my life had been spent trying to make the choice between history and literature moot."

Of course you could interpret this statement as a bashful attempt to justify the defiant, un-historian-like floweriness of Schama's prose, but - for what it's worth - the more books I read by Simon Schama, the more I'm impressed by not just his fluency and eloquence as a popular historian, but by the beauty, imagination and emotional insight of his writing. His newest book The American Future, which examines the myriad ways in which America has imagined its own future "from the founding fathers to Barack Obama", isn't any kind of departure from his previous output of so-called "narrative history", and as such is unlikely to convert any of his critics, but it definitely feels more socially relevant than many of his recent publications, which have leant more towards art history than politics (The Power of Art, Rembrandt's Eyes, Landscape and Memory (which is excellent btw) etc).

The American Future, then, sweeps through two hundred-plus years of American history in just under 500 pages. This compression of so much history inevitably results in an unrelenting barrage of names, dates and political terms that make great demands on both the reader's concentration and memory. Attempting to remember every place or event or person mentioned in just a single chapter is akin to standing in front of one of those tennis ball machines set to rapid fire and trying to catch (and hold onto) every ball it serves: some - if not most - are going to pass you by. Thankfully this quick-fire and comprehensive approach is tempered by Schama's narrative (I'm wary of saying "novelistic") treatment of history. Schama's concern for his subjects' emotional lives, coupled with frequent deferrals to diary entries, letters and photographs make The American Future a pre-eminently affecting and story-like telling of history. There's little concern for chronology as the book flits, sometimes in the span of a single sentence, between different decades (and even centuries) of history in a bid to make whatever over-arching thematic or structural point a particular chapter is concerned with. Like all narrative history, then, The American Future is open to such accusations that the book is more concerned with imbuing an emotional impression upon its readers than, say, delivering as much objective information as possible - and that's fine; it is, of course, down to the caprice of the individual reader to decide what they read history for. The prose takes undeniable poetic license with history, but always in an attempt to (cliché imminent...) bring its subjects to life:

"As if in supplication, one of the cassocked choir would every so often slowly lift both arms, palms upwards, trembling, like a marionette worked by a celestial puppeteer."

In the opening chapter `America at War', Schama establishes the dichotomy that he will use throughout the book to analyse various aspects of American history: Jeffersonian vs. Hamiltonian approaches to militarism. Thomas Jefferson favoured a limited army of well-educated specialists trained in engineering and capable of re-building a country's infrastructure following a war - an army to defend liberty. Alexander Hamilton, by contrast, argued for a larger, more militaristic force - an army to spread liberty. The parallels with modern American approaches to foreign policy aren't lost on Schama, who at one point describes Mitt Romney as a "neo-liberal Hamiltonian".

The book uses these two radically contrasting approaches to Americana as a spring board to launch investigations into such wide-ranging topics as slavery, irrigation, the compulsory purchase of Cherokee land and national identity - all contained within their own distinct chapters. Naturally some investigations are more successful than others; I found `What is an American' to be a rambling and ungraspable chapter that comes to few conclusions while spreading itself regrettably thin with its examples and sources. `American Fervour', by comparison, is a passionate and moving examination of the role of religion in the lives of slaves, with frequent quotations taken from the `Sorrow Songs' recorded by black army officer Robert Sutton in the 1860s; it stands as a testament to Schama's emotional conviction that it's not enough to simply "know" history,but that "we've got to understand" it too.

Determined to plant its flag firmly in the Jeffersonian camp, The American Future takes a somewhat hagiographic approach to describing the third President of the United States, and is especially praising of Jefferson's little-studied and undoubtedly enlightened (would we say "modern"?) attitudes towards religion:

"Though Jefferson held Jesus in high esteem, as perhaps the greatest of history's moral teachers, he thought is absurd, if not offensive, to compromise that standing by fairy tales declaring him the Son of God, born of a virgin and such foolishness. [...] Jefferson believed that adhesion to unexamined and irrational beliefs had been the greatest cause of contention and slaughter in the world, for there could be no arguing with those who asserted from revelation alone."

But later derisions of Jefferson's personal life and his contradictory attitudes toward slavery build up a complex and multi-dimensional picture of the book's primary subject: part moralistic, part reviled. This is one of Schama's more interesting stylistic ticks, and in this respect The American Future really is novelistic: red herrings abound as figures are introduced, praised and set-up as likeable, only to be deconstructed and exposed as bigoted or selfish in subsequent chapters. I found myself, for example, quite taken by manufacturing giant Henry Ford when Schama describes the free schools he established for his migrant workforce and his unwavering dedication to a liveable wage, only to be crushed with disappointment when it's revealed that Ford also penned the book The International Jew: The World's Foremost Problem. It's this up-and-down, wavering and constant re-assessment of his subjects that fuels a lot of anti-Schama criticism from readers who would prefer a more consistent and "objective" approach to history, but I nonetheless enjoyed the complex positioning of the novel, as Schama attempts to present America as very much a frontier nation: not either/or, but filled with contradictions and difficulties.

As you'd expect from Simon Schama, The American Future leans distinctly to the left, and as such the book is most interesting when constructing history via the personal struggles of down-trodden masses rather than the political lives of the elite. Chapters are separated by short present-day vignettes describing Schama's 2008 road trip across America following the Obama campaign, in which he interviews numerous regular Joes in an attempt to gauge not the media or politicians' reactions to Obama, but the people's.

The American Future is a dense, challenging history book made joyously readable by Schama's narrative approach. It presupposes an understanding of American history that I was unable to bring to the book (I frequently found myself Googling the dates of Presidents' terms or the specifics of various legislation, for example) and in this regard it suffers from a lack of a comprehensive glossary. Sure it's a bit of a crash course (after all, who can cover all of American history in 500 pages?!) but if, like me, your reading background is more fiction than non-fiction oriented, then I highly recommend The American Future as both a helpful way-in to American history and an extraordinarily beautiful piece of writing.
2 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 20 April 2009
Having loved Schama's History of Britain and enjoyed the TV series upon which this American history is based, I was very much looking forward to reading this book.

Sadly, however, it is barely readable. A ragged jumble of prose seems to require a detailed understanding of the protagonists and events being discussed to make any sense of what is being described.

This is not the book for a newcomer to American history. It seems to be to be a colour commentary on events. I knew not to expect an ABC of US history but I could certainly have done with more context and a more linear structure to make it more accessible.

The British History books jumped around a little but they had a much greater narrative drive then this. Schama's greatest failing in this book is that he bores, and that's inexcusable.
10 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 7 August 2011
It was my first expierence of reading about American History and I was very disappointed. The book lacks the structure, the constant jumping between periods annoyed me and at one point I was very confused. The book had insightful detail, but after about the third example on the same idea I was left bored.
2 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 29 September 2013
I like Simon Schama's TV documentaries so I was expecting this book to be as well-written, interesting and engaging as his television scripts. Sadly it isn't.
It covers different themes that don't really relate to each other and leaves the reader wondering how and why Schama chose his topics.
I regret buying the book - it was a complete waste of money and I'd encourage others thinking of purchasing it to keep hold of their cash.
I'll still be watching Schama's documentaries, but I certainly won't be buying one of his books again.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse