Learn more Download now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more

on 9 July 2017
Written in an accessible and interesting style. Great read to broaden thought on how the world gets to be where it is.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 4 February 2008
Just finished "The Logic of Life", the second book by Tim Harford of "Undercover Economist" fame, and recommend it to anyone with an interest in economics and/or how the world works.

The book's essential premise is that you're not as stupid as you look: or, to put it another way, that human behaviour is the product of rational choices, however seemingly irrational, destructive or absurd the outcomes of those choices may be. The book then ranges across subjects as diverse as the causes of the industrial revolution, institutional racism and teen America's fondness for oral sex to prove the case. (Incidentally I tip my hat the poor sap who, one assumes, wagered that Tim couldn't work the phrase "teenage fellatrices" into the first few pages of a book of popular economics - and lost.)

"The Logic of Life" uses the tools (and research) available to the professional economist to make clear a number of seemingly-intractable puzzles: why in a seemingly democratic political system governments consistently favour small interest groups with huge subsidies (it's not worth the trouble for the voters to co-ordinate themselves to save a couple of cents each in taxes, but it's well worth the trouble of agribusiness to coordinate itself to demand millions of dollars in subsidies); whether colonial rule benefited the colonised territories (yes, when it left them with the institutions that are necessary to create wealth already in place); and whether it's a good idea for people who dine regularly together to take it in turns to pick up the bill (contrary to Tim's previous advice in his "Dear Economist" column for the FT, almost certainly - no one diner cares enough about a bill split ten ways to watch out for the restaurant ripping the party off, but if you take it in turns to pick up the tab the guy whose turn it is to pay will put a quick stop to unordered bottles of wine arriving at the table).

Probably my favourite part of the book, however, is the summary of William Nordhaus's work on measuring how improvements in technology from one period to another translate into economic gains. Nordhaus considered, and attempted to measure, the labour required to light a room of a house, using for the purpose first a pile of wood he had chopped, carried and ignited himself; then a Roman oil lamp; and finally a modern lightbulb. He concluded, perhaps not surprisingly, that the Roman oil lamp was not only easier and cheaper to light but produced a sensationally better quality of light, and that of course the modern lightbulb offered the same benefits over the Roman oil lamp again. Over to Tim:

"Nordhaus's experiments suggested that as far as light was concerned, economic growth has been underestimated not by a factor of two or three but ten thousand times over. A modern lightbulb, illuminating a room from 6pm until midnight every night for a year, produces the same amount of light as thirty-four thousand candles from the early nineteenth century. In the early nineteenth century, earning the money to buy thirty-four thousand candles would have taken an average worker all year. When I remind myself to turn off unnecessary lights, I am saving light that would have taken my grandfather's grandfather all his working hours to provide. For me, the saving is too small to notice."

Confirmation, if any more were remotely needed, that this is the best time in the history of the world to be alive. To - quite deliberately - mangle the words of that fool Cecil Rhodes, always remember that you are living in the C21st and have therefore come first in the lottery of life.

"The Logic of Life" is not only an excellent summary of the current state of the art in behavioural economic research and a treasure-trove of fascinating factoids, but a warm and engaging book, a rational man's attempt to share with the reader his obvious love of the world and its rational foundations. Perhaps the truth won't make you free, but understanding how the world works through the lens of "The Logic of Life" will make you appreciate it a whole lot more.
33 Comments| 58 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
VINE VOICEon 21 May 2008
Tim Harford has again managed to write a book on Economics that I read in a weekend (well Thursday to Saturday, but weekends are stretchy!). Give that I've tried and failed to finish the Black Swan and wasn't really all that impressed with Freakonomics that's a pretty big recommendation.

In this book Harford dwells more on how cities can be more amenable to live in, rational prostitutes and race and sex roles. You can tell he's started a family since the last book as a lot of the topics focus on 'quality of life' issues.

Again underlying the book is that we make rational choices within our limitations and that we respond to incentives with surprising deftness. Other reviewers have been quite critical of this thesis but Harford defends it really well. He explains why if I go to a playgroup with my son why I'm likely to be one of the only men there, why cities end up segregated because of relatively mild preferences and why it's rational under certain circumstance for a prostitute not to use a condom (no really!).

I really enjoy these books, it's just a shame he doesn't write for the Independent (as I'd get to read his weekly column).
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 6 April 2008
I quite enjoyed the Undercover Economist, but I was less impressed by Tim Harford's second book The Logic of Life. I guess it's primarily about asserting rational choice as a (the?) major force in human history and society. This comes at a time when behavioural economics is on the rise and challenging (successfully or otherwise) economic assumptions about rationality.

I think Harford does quite a good job at arguing back against the behavioural approach (though this isn't a stated objective). He makes the point early on that much of the research that suggests we make 'irrational' decisions comes from labatory experiments utilising more abstract ideas. However when we are in the real world (or in our comfort zone as Harford puts it) we are more likely to act rationally. Experience makes us more able to make the rational choice. In contrast when we are in a new and unusual situation - interestingly he uses the example of deciding how much to save for a pension - we find it much harder to act rationally.

He then goes on to apply the rational choice perspective to various different issues. The section on bosses' pay is interesting, and presents a fairly convincing argument both for why management pay is probably undeserved and why shareholders in companies with high pay may not bother to challenge it. I liked the comparison to splitting the bill at a meal. (He could have added the principal-agent problem of the investors not typically investing their own money).

I found the section on 'rational' racism particularly interesting/depressing. It describes how the impact of racism can become a vicious circle - if black kids don't see an advantage in education (because employers don't take them on anyway) they won't bother, and in turn that will reinforce employer prejudices about the educational standards of black kids. There's also some interesting stuff about how neighbourhoods end up very segregated because of a relatively mild preference to not live in an area where people of your ethic group are a small minority. This actually looked familiar to me - I think Paul Ormerod covered similar ground in Why Most Things Fail.

Sometimes I think he overplays it. At one point he asserts in passing that obesity in wealthy societies might be a 'rational' response to the ease of getting food, and time required to undertake exercise. Maybe, and maybe it's much more complicated than that. Why are some people obese and others not? Is it just because those people who are obese are responsing to different incentives - or are other factors at play?

And its little examples like this that bother me about the book. They remind me that as seductive as rational choice is as a perspective for explaining what is going on it has its limitations. Though I finished the book more convinced by some ideas (the stuff about unreliable political regimes and their impact on economies can surely be applied to places like Zimbabwe) I didn't find it anything like as illuminating as I thought I would.
11 Comment| 23 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 17 February 2008
If I suggested that this was 'a stonking good read' you might think this is the wrong term to use. You would call a novel 'a page turner' and describe it as 'a stonking good read', but not a non-fiction book, let alone a book about economics. Yet, this is no ordinary economics book. Like his previous book 'The Undercover Economist' you don't need to be an economist to read it. Indeed, if there is a prerequisite, it to be interested in life rather than have a head for numbers.

Yes, there are other books that try to make economics interesting; the difference with this book is that the author doesn't try too hard. He uses economics to explore what is puzzling, sometimes irrational and bizarre - like racism, why your boss is overpaid (a personal favourite), and a subject that must have been chosen for the press releases, oral sex. Whilst still as wide ranging as his previous book, this one does not skip through so many economic theories and feels better for it. Having read it, I now have another way to think about those things that seem irrational and illogical, and that is not just limited to the examples in the book.

I would recommend it to anyone who read The Undercover Economist, but you don't need to have read that book, read the Financial Times, or have any previous knowledge in economics no matter how popular it is becoming. This book is easy to read, it doesn't patronise but it's interesting, because it has shares a joyful interest in life.
0Comment| 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
VINE VOICEon 23 April 2008
Many of the popular books about economics seek to convince you that human beings are wildly illogical. Why? Because the dollars and sense of what people say and do don't always match up well. Tim Harford gets past that problem by mostly ignoring the academic studies that seem far removed from reality by emphasizing what people do when they are new to something.

The book is at its best when he's explaining how systemic biases can create large shifts in human behavior. For instance, a slight preference for having neighbors who are like oneself can lead to quite substantial segregation along race, religion, education, and economic lines.

For me, the book lacked any big "gotcha" like the finding that abortions may have contributed to lowering crime.

In almost every section, I thought that Mr. Harford was arguing (or at least haranguing) beyond the limits of his evidence.

When he moves beyond being an observer into someone trying to convince you what people are like, I found he was often offensive. There's a section about how those who aren't native to Africa "solved" the problem of dying from malaria by transferring slaves from Africa to milder climates that's insensitive at best.

To Mr. Harford's eye, we are so much creatures of economics, comfort, and the pursuit of gain that there's no role for any other human motives. That's a too limited view of people . . . and hardly an uplifting one.

Unless you are addicted to Mr. Harford's writing, skip this book. It won't tell you much that you need to know.
0Comment| 15 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
TOP 1000 REVIEWERon 13 September 2011
There has been a debate within economics circles between behavioural economists who have tempered models and premises about decision making with psychological research findings and more classical ideas about rational choice making.

Harford, I get the impression, is definitely a proponent of the classical rational choice making theories and models, this book in fact sets out to investigate all the manners in which individuals who do not appear to be acting in as rational, utility maximising decision makers are, when you frame the investigation properly, behaving logically.

Possibly the most cited example from this book that I was familiar with prior to reading it is the scandal in the US about the increase in oral sex between adolescents. Harford explains how as a consequence of rising awareness, educational programmes about HIV for instance, this was a logical development or consequence rather than some fearful and unfathomable development. This is only about three or four pages long, if even that, at the beginning of the book and not even the best content in the book.

The book has a clear contents, index, it is structured well and the pace and style of writing make for a good accessible and interesting read. I believe that the general reader and economically interested or studious reader alike would appreciate this book and I would recommend it to either, it is better than Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, in my highly subjective opinion, definitely better than The Undercover Economist and Dear Undercover Economist: The Very Best Letters from the "Dear Economist" Column: The Undercover Economist Solves Life's Everyday Mysteries and Problems which preceeded and came after it.

I dont consider all the conclusions and content to be as convincing as that which I have read from behavioural economists such as in Animal Spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why It Matters for Global Capitalism (New in Paper) or Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces that Shape Our Decisions but it resembles them more than other economics books such as The Best Book on the Market: How to Stop Worrying and Love the Free Economy.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 19 January 2010
The book is about human decision making and why we are the way we are. Harford uses examples and studies by economists all over the world to explain why neighbourhoods and ghettoes spring up in the ways they do. Harford also talks about the 'rational' reasons behind racism; he's not defending it but reporting on some of the research that's been done. I found the book fascinating, although he did lose me occasionally. I suspect that even an attempt to make economics populist still can't disguise the fact that economics is a fairly hardcore, numbers-driven subject!

In the opening chapter, Harford talks about an American 'pandemic' of teenagers having more oral sex. Harford explains from an economist's point of view how this can be seen as a rational behaviour given some of the other pressures going on in the world. The example is a little sensationalist and I can see why he included it - a little bit of titillation but intriguing enough to draw the reader in. I can, however, see that some readers may be put off by this slightly tabloid-esque opener. I would recommend that you read on regardless because it's a good book.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 19 February 2008
I highly recommend this book. I really enjoyed reading about the theories and the evidence behind 'the new economics of everything', which looked at human behaviours from a perspective that was less familiar to me, as a psychologist, but which I found interesting, valuable and accesible. The biographical and historical details meant that 'logic of life' had a lovely story-like quality that only an accomplished social science writer like Tim Harford is able to achieve. Looking forward to his next book.
0Comment| 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 8 July 2017
My son said it was a good read.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)