Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop now New Album - Steps Shop now Shop Women's Shop Men's

Customer Reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star

Your rating(Clear)Rate this item
Share your thoughts with other customers

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 2 May 2006
The Polish-born Panufnik (1914-1991) arrived in the UK during the fifties and made it his home. His cycle of ten symphonies is a valuable addition to the 20th century repertoire, and the third, the Sinfonia Sacra, which won the Prince Rainier prize, is one of the hidden treasures of the genre (although not completely unknown; there have been three other recordings and a Proms performance in 2003). This CD unites a reissue of the recording made as part of the prize with another two symphonies, his first, a spicy, earthy piece where the orchestra is split into antiphonal groups, and his fourth, more contemplative, with important solo parts for flute and harp. The Sinfonia Sacra is the cracker of the disc, however, from its arresting opening with fanfares for four trumpets spaced around the orchestra, through an ethereal static contemplation for strings, a demonic fast movement to its last movement, an unfolding of the earliest Polish national hymn which reaches its climax with a thrilling reprise of the four trumpets' first movement fanfares ringing out over everything else; a real spine-tingling moment. These recordings date from 1966 and 1975 and whilst great for their age, are not quite top drawer, hence the four stars; but the works themselves and their performances with composer as conductor are of particular value and well worth exploring, particularly at this price. A big thanks to EMI for this reissue.
0Comment| 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 19 March 2009
A generously filled disc of some genuinely interesting 20th century symphonic works. Panufnik's sound world is intriguing: caustic brass writing and haunting in the Sacra, more jolly bucolic humour in Rustica (the Sinfonia Concertante is less immediately appealing though). If you are interested in exploring the lesser-known, however, you need have no hesitation here. It has the authoritative stamp of the composer at the helm, is well recorded and expertly played (particularly the Menuhin Festival Orchestra in Sinfonia Sacra).
0Comment| 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 16 September 2010
Now that I've heard all of Andrzej Panufnik's symphonies except #7 (apparently not yet available on CD - there was once a Unicorn LP) and #10, I am tempted to conclude that, as good wine, Panufnik got better as he aged. Symphony #2 ("Elegiaca") from 1957 (Panufnik - Nocturne; Rhapsody; Sinfonia Elegiaca) I found somewhat clichéd and bombastic, derivative of Shostakovich and trying a little too hard to sound, as its title implies, elegiac. Symphony #3 (Sacra) from 1963 is, if the number of recordings is to serve as a pointer, Panufnik's most popular work: I first discovered it through another (and later) composer-conducted recording, this time with the glorious Amsterdam Concertgebouw, on Elektra/Nonesuch (see my review on the US sister company of Panufnik: Sinfonia sacra/Arbor cosmica). Other than these two, this site also lists two recent recordings by Gerard Schwarz (Andrzej Panufnik: Symphony No. 10 (World Premiere Recording) / Autumn Music / Heroic Overture / Sinfonia Sacra - Seattle Symphony) and John Storgards (Panufnik: Heroic Overture; Sinfonia de Sfere; Landscape; Sinfonia Sacra [Hybrid SACD]). Yet, though I find it ultimately quite effective and wining, I do think its architecture is somewhat simplistic and its musical resources rather unsubtle, going a little too much for immediate effect not to elicit some resistance.

But the symphonies composed from the 1970s on (# 5 "di Sfere" in 1975, 6 "Mistica" in 1977, 8 "Votiva" in 1981 and 9 "della Speranza" in 1986, see Panufnik - Sinfonia Mistica; Sinfonia di Sfere,Panufnik & Sessions: Symphony No. 8 & Concerto and Panufnik: Symphony No9, Concerto for piano) I find superb works, modern in language but not aggressively so, organising a highly effective architecture of tension and repose and resulting in great dramatic impact. The two Symphonies contained on this CD other than Sinfonia Sacra further confirm my impression.

Despite some nice orchestral touches (like the string glissandos in the slow movement), some of them resulting from the antiphonal placement of the strings (two quintets surrounded the woodwind and brass section, and the recording highlights them very well), the folk-inspired Sinfonia Rustica (1948, revised 1955) sounds not so much like one of those many works composed in imitation of Bartok in the late 1940s and early 1950s (and here it would be the most accessible, folk-inspired Bartok of the Hungarian Dances), as one written in imitation of Kodaly, strikingly so. Not that it is a bad specimen in that not so frequent genre, but still, it sounds very derivative.

But Sinfonia Concertante for flute, harp and strings, wich dates from 1973, is something else. It is terse, enigmatic, gentle, meditative, its textures are chamber-like, starting with a beautifully mysterious duet of the two solo instruments. It displays genuine imagination and, in its apparently unassuming character, it is highly original and quite daring.

Sinfonia Sacra and Sinfonia Rustica were originally recorded by EMI in 1966 and published together (HMV ASD 2298), and later licensed by Unicorn. This is why the same recordings can be found, but separately, on two Unicorn CD reissues, completed with shorter Panufnik pieces : Tragic Overture / Autumn Music / Heroic Overture and Panufnik - Sinfonia Sacra / Concerto Festivo / Concertino / Landscape. I prefer to have them back together, even if it entails the loss of the shorter pieces which complete the Unicorn CDs. As expected, in Sinfonia Sacra the Monte Carlo Orchestra sounds more rough and untidy than the Concertgebouw, and the composer's later recording on Elektra/Nonesuch remains a better choice, all the more so as it contains the magnificent "Arbor Cosmica" for 12 strings (1983), one of Panufnik's masterpieces and arguably one of the great masterpieces of 20th Century music for string ensemble. But for Sinfonia Concertante alone this new reissue is worth buying, and the duplication of Sinfonia Sacra no big obstacle. Sinfonia Concertante was recorded in 1975 and first released on LP as EMI EMD 552, paired with the composer's Violin Concerto performed by Menuhin (earlier reissued on another EMI "British Composers" disc, paired with Concertos of Berkeley and Williamson, but now sadly difficult to find, Berkeley/Williamson/Panufnik - Violin Concertos ).

Liner notes are pretty scanty. The dates of composition aren't even given, I had to go on Panufnik's website to retrieve them.
22 Comments| 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 23 May 2011
These performances have the benefit of performance with the composer himself conducting. Sinfonia Rustica (no 1) and Sinfonia Sacra (no 3) were recorded in the mid 1960s and the sound quality is showing its age. Even so the performances are spirited. These early symphonies express more overt Polish nationalism than his later works but show his skills in the tight organisation of material. Rustica uses folk like material throughout but this is harmonically stretched - possibly as far as he could go under the Polish communist regime.

Sinfonia Sacra is a stirring piece and his most famous - celebrating Polish nationhood and Catholic faith. There are better recordings both for standard of playing and recording but this one has more urgency and spirit than the more calculated later readings.

Sinfonia Concertante (Symphony no 4) shows a development in his style towards a more expansive tonality but this is very refined, balanced and ordered music. The combination of solo instruments is exquisitely coloured. Recorded later, the sound quality is much improved.

Although there are reservations about the sound quality in the earlier pieces this stands as an excellent survey of his earlier symphonies so comes warmly recommended.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse