Top critical review
Not as good as i'd hoped...
on 12 February 2003
Anything that Chris Cornell does is worth a look but i was underwhelmed by this album. Its like RATM music with c.c's vocals and most of the tracks don't seem to work. The same problem as Cornell's solo album-the slower tracks work better than the rockers. His vocals are great as usual but i've always felt that he had an old skool rock style and that just doesn't seem to fit in well with the hip-hop flavoured experimental music of RATM. Zacks voice suited them better as his punchy, abrupt delivery fitted in well with their music.
Judging by the random response, i am in the minority here, but i gotta say its mostly uninspiring and definately no classic.