Learn more Download now Shop now Shop now flip flip flip Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more

on 11 May 2012
In his 10th book on the 9/11 massacre, D.R. Griffin presents himself once again as a courageous intellectual, who doesn't betray his moral principles in the face of an immoral hegemonic oligarchy.

Blatant Lies
He summarizes the blatant lies and contradictions in the official version of the 9/11 massacre, the retractions and denials of former statements by witnesses and the revision of the timetables. He also gives possible new clues about the events.
He discusses mainly the straight-down free-fall of the three towers (while only two were hit) as well as the Pentagon attack, which destroyed mainly its accountancy department. The latter was examining a hole of 2.3 trillion dollars in the Pentagon books. All the records were destroyed.

9/11 and its consequences
9/11 was an inside job involving many branches of the government and dozens of powerful people. The evidence planted in the attacks served to make it appear that they had been carried out by Arab Muslims.
The massacre had very serious consequences. Internationally, it `justified' the `War on Terror' against Muslim nations and the direct military interventions in Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan, Libya, Yemen and Somalia. Nationally, it provoked an assault on the US constitution and on democratic civil rights.

9/11 and the `free' media
The media all over the world (continue to) conceal the extremely bitter truth. Nearly the whole Academy and Religious Institutions worldwide stay mute. For the author, the reason for this could be twofold. On the one hand, an evil deed like this is so heinous that it seems `highly unlikely that the government would do anything nefarious on a scale of this epic nature.' On the other hand, as Upton Sinclair has said (quoted in this book), `it is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it.' In this context, journalists even endorse miracles.
But, for reasons of morality and justice it is essential to get the 9/11 lie exposed openly and not only on Internet.

D.R. Griffin's book is a damning verdict and a must read for all those who want to understand the world we live in.
14 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 30 May 2016
Griffin continues to write excellent material, but shies away from a full understanding of the security camera footage. Having independently demonstrated that the forward cam is edited to excise the vehicle and display only smoke (interpreted as a 'nose' or 'missile') it seems I am anticipated by Pier Paulo Murru and 'Boolean subtraction", (which I refer to as pixel-reveal).
However Griffin fails to record further evidence that can be gleaned from the images, as well as downplaying the significance of the deception. Tampering with evidence in a criminal trial is itself a criminal offence, making the US DoD editing a criminal offence, perhaps the first and only such verifiable offence, and yet which has not been prosecuted.
Griffin avoids further details regarding the images, so the following may also have been anticipated but I state them here and my analysis can be seen and read in "911 Pentagon Strike: US DoD Criminal Action". The images show that:
a) the flight path of the vehicle is at least 60 degrees and as much as 90 degrees off the 'official' track (taking it across empty parkland and terminating in a military facility)
b) the vehicle cannot (contrary to Griffin et al) have been a B757
c) a well defined but faint vehicle outline is present with consistent airplane/missile planform (fuselage, hint of wings, vertical tail, single engine)
d) that vehicle outline can be scaled off the Pentagon and track and shown to be far too small to be a B757 (supporting b) but approximately the right size for eg: an AGM86
e) contrary to the WTC 'fuel' explosion which occurs deep inside the building, the Pentagon explosion occurs primarily at the face of the building (though I mention that as only a secondary matter)
Using the pixel-reveal technique:
f) there are no pixels available to be a vehicle ahead of the forward cam 'smoke' confirming that the image is a composite, whence tampering and a criminal offence; supported by discoloration
g) there are no pixels available in the rear cam shot other than those of the small 'vehicle'. Those attempting to show a B757 have no pixels with which to do so
The trajectory of the vehicle is supported by:
h) a linear smoke-trail with smoke-trail shadow away from the Pentagon which is:
I) at least parallel to if not converging with, as it moves away from the Pentagon, a path feature clearly discernible in overhead shots
j) which itself is angled to the right (north) from the perpendicular, rather than the left (south)
k) thus the trajectory is at least from the north of the perpendicular
l) That is further supported by the perspective convergence of the vehicle/smoke trail to shadow line (wide to the right, narrow at point of impact)

In short, proper analysis of the image, contrary to Griffin, is sufficient to render all other analysis superfluous, precisely the reverse of his position.

It shows that:
A) The US Govt lied about the trajectory, the nature of the vehicle
B) That the US DoD evidence shows a vehicle the size of a cruise missile or similar munition, such as operated only by the US military and government
C) That on the trajectory, the 'witnesses' to the B757 (which may have existed but didn't hit the Pentagon) are irrelevant
D) That this eliminates the absurd 'melting balsa airplane' required for the lack of impact damage on the face of the Pentago
E) That regardless of opinion, the tampering is itself a criminal act by a US government agency regarding 9/11

In short, it is all that is needed for a rational human being to recognise that the government lied, used military munitions, and lied again.

Everything else is supportive, and reinforces what even the most ardent loyalist might have trouble refuting, that 9/11 was indeed a false flag event.

One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 22 December 2015
This book is quite simply a master class in cogent reasoning, acute analysis and powers of deduction. Unlike other reviewers I was already pretty sure something was very fishy about the official 9/11 story through my forays on the alternative media and youtube but this book provides a wide ranging deconstruction of the lies surrounding this state crime against democracy.

Even disregarding the magnitude of the subject matter, this book is a highly enjoyable read in its own right and my favourite read of 2015 - and I've read some truly great books this year. In fact I was engaged from the very first page, better than any crime thriller. This book gives new meaning to the adage that reality beats fiction. I look forward to reading some of the other books on 9/11 by this brave, honest and truth-seeking American.

Five stars
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 17 October 2013
Overall a very well researched and well written insight into the events of 9/11. I would have given the review five stars except from time to time David Ray Griffin strays into unsupported supposition which in my view detracts and perhaps devalues the more factual evidence he produces.

As an example, he queries why so few passengers on the hijacked aircraft made phone calls, suggesting that in his view far more would have called loved ones once they new the planes had been hijacked. Of course, there's no evidence to support this view, and it would be just as easy to argue a contrary position, questioning whether any passengers would have had the presence of mind to make a call in such a situation, and instead casting doubt over why the number of calls was so high.

Despite this minor criticism, I'd recommend this book strongly for anyone looking beyond official accounts of the events of 9/11.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 2 May 2017
Essential reading. Absolutely destroys the official Bullsh*t a thousand times over.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 9 April 2013
An analysis of the power of the corporate media and its success in forming perceptions in large populations, despite a growing body of professionals that know the official version of 9/11 is a cover-up that serves the interests of the powers behind the presidential throne.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 17 May 2013
Highy recommended for anyone searching for the truth. you can trust D R Griffin and he is showing you time after time, example after example. Great read.
2 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 30 April 2014
Griffin nails it again, sad so many unable to comprehend the true nature of the 9/11 events. Great book for beginners but one must step further and realise no planes at all were used in the attacks, instead terrible computer graphics were foisted on the public to brainwash tax payers into funding an eternal war against 3rd world oil rich countries.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 26 March 2013
9/11, a lot of people were killed, the authorities want us to believe their version of events. This book offers an alternative account of what happened that day. The information is compelling - read it and reach your own conclusion.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 12 September 2014
very good,about the investigation about the attacks of 9/11.They are an inside job with the cumplixcity of governement Bush
|0Comment|Report abuse