Learn more Download now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop now Shop now Learn more Learn more Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more

TOP 500 REVIEWERVINE VOICEon 30 November 2014
Wanting is the story of Sir John Franklin, a navigator immortalised in folk song: "ten thousand pounds would I freely give, to say on Earth that my Franklin do live". Lost seeking a passage through the Arctic Ocean, Franklin was an enterprising hero.

The truth, ostensibly portrayed here by Richard Flanagan, is that Franklin was a weak and lazy man, spurred to take high office and seek adventure by a domineering wife. After he was lost, it is common knowledge that his wife kept his memory alive through offering rewards, demanding rescue missions and soliciting the help of the great and the good. In Wanting, we see Lady Franklin trying to sign up a dubious Charles Dickens to the cause.

But of perhaps greater interest is Franklin's previous experience as Lieutenant-Governor of Van Diemans's Land (now Tasmania). Franklin inherited a pretty lawless place where European settlers had created the harshest conditions for convicts and set about exterminating the indigenous population - and Franklin sat back and watched. Under sufferance and at the behest of his wife, Sir John set about touring the colony and found the remains of a tribe of Aboriginal people who had suffered violence and disease. The king, Towterer, had been killed and his head taken for study. His infant daughter had been named Mathinna and appropriated by the local headman, Robinson, but was taken back to Hobart by Lady Franklin and adopted as her own. Initially an experiment to see how far indigenous people could be trained to act like white people, Mathinna fell out of favour when the answer turned out to be "too much". And when the Franklins returned to England, Mathinna was sent to the state orphanage. Mathinna was subsequently returned to her community, rejected because she was too European, and died young whilst working as a prostitute.

Mathinna's story is true and known, hence it is not really a spoiler to discuss it. It represents one of the darkest episodes in a dark history of European settlement in Australia.

The point in Wanting is, perhaps, to bring that story to those who do not already know it, but more to counterpoint the supposed heroism of the Franklins with this despicable act of colonial betrayal.

The Dickens sections of Wanting feel slower and more laboured. There is supposed to be a conflict between Dickens's public and very proper persona and his private life as a womaniser. Perhaps it is a parallel to the chasm between public and private conduct of the Franklins. But as a story, it is covered better by Gaynor Arnold in Girl In A Blue Dress. There is some discussion about whether the mark of a civilised person is being master of his own desires. Doubtless, Lady Franklin would have felt vindicated by Mathinna's fall into sin and disgrace and seen this as nature shining through lavish nurture, but the reader is left to reflect that Dickens himself led no more moral a life.

Wanting is a complex novel and as an account of the injustices faced by the Traditional Owners of Australia, it works well. As a debunking of Franklin, it does work but was probably unnecessary - the recent proof of rumours of cannibalism in the Arctic being sufficient. But the Dickens stuff just seems to get in the way.
7 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 5 August 2015
As a literary exercise, this was an excellent book. As a novel, for me, it just didn't quite work.

There are two stories set about twenty years apart. In the first, in Van Diemen's Land, the British-run penal colony, John Franklyn and his wife have taken over the governorship and 'adopted' a native girl. The plan is to convert her from savage to a 'true' English woman, to demonstrate to the world the 'superiority' of Englishness, and to 'prove' that it can triumph over even what they perceived to be the most base, the most vicious and amoral instincts with which the girl was imbibed simply by virtue of her birth.

In the second story, we find Charles Dickens at a crossroads. He's fallen out of love with Catherine, his wife, he's lost Dora, his youngest child, and his melancholia has driven him out onto the London streets, to question the whole ethos of family, hearth and home that he has essentially created. Enter Jane Franklyn, whose husband John has perished in a bid to find the North West Passage, and has been accused of resorting to cannibalism. Jane, appalled at this very savage and un-English accusation, which undermines the noble memory she's worked so hard to create of her husband, wants Dickens, through his writing, to 'prove' that there is no way Franklyn would have allowed himself or his crew to commit such a foul crime.

At this point in the story of course, we don't know what happened to the Franklyn's experiment with their native adopted child, but the parallels are clearly drawn. Frankly and Dickens both feel themselves trapped, past their prime, and are seeking to reclaim their earlier fame. Both feel that their wives are dragging them down. Both are attracted to the youth, the freshness, the tabula rasa of a young girl - at this point Franklyn is obsessed with his adopted daughter, and Dickens has just met Ellen Ternan, the 18 year old actress with whom he had an affaire that lasted the rest of his life (and if you want to know more about this, do read Claire Tomalin's fabulous biography of Ellen). Dickens's play about Franklyn takes over his life, and as he writes and acts in it, the concept of the noble savage, of Englishness, of man's carnal appetites when the bonds of civilisation are removed, take over him too. As his play begins to re-establish Franklyn, we see, in Franklyn's previous life, that not only is his wife's experiment with the native child fading, but that rather than have her 'tamed', she is in fact going a long way to un-tame them.

So, as I said, this is a fascinating literary study. I love the use of two so famous historical characters, the probing into the darkness of their minds and the speculation as to their motivation. I loved the parallels in the stories. But...

The problem is, there was no real story. In a literary novel, there maybe doesn't have to be - in my university years, I'd probably have argued strongly for this to be the case. But I don't think so now. So okay, it was a character study. Yes, it was, but it left me wanting something more out of it. There weren't any conclusions. Don't get me wrong. This was brilliantly written. The prose in places left me in complete awe. It was a fascinating subject matter, and it asked some really interesting questions. But I felt, on the whole, that the novel didn't reach a destination. I felt, ultimately, frustrated.
5 people found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 11 April 2015
Not an easy read but worth persevering as the narrative switches from the Victorian heroes of Dickens, Franklin and the rumoured cannibalism at his end and the earlier colony of Van Diemans land in which the attempts to civilise the Aborigines is both ludicrous and horrific. Desire, it's repression and enactment, are the drivers of all mankind - be they black or white. Only Matthinna the adopted black child is innocent in her misunderstood vitality which so-called civilisation corrupts and destroys.
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 9 May 2016
Well written and interesting but so, so sad with no redeeming features. i really enjoyed the Narrow Road to the North where, underlying the horrors of the prisoner of war camp, there was a positive message about love but I did not find anything positive in Wanting and this has put me off reading more books by Flanagan
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 19 February 2016
This isn't the type of book I'd usually read, but I had to read it for one of my uni modules. It was actually really interesting, and Flanagan creates a flowing narrative that's easy to follow but also isn't dumbed down
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 25 November 2014
I agree with the majority of reviewers that the tenuous links between two effectively separate stories makes the novel structure unsatisfactory. In the end neither story is told as well as it could have been. Nor was I convinced by the characterisation and I did not find that the novel informed me satisfactorily on how the desires that contributed to the "wanting" in the characters originated. I was left with the feeling that here were two very interesting novels, each of which needed more work to make them fully compelling.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 26 March 2016
I enjoyed the book. However, in the end the predictable downfall of Mathinna was tedious and uninspiring,as well as that of all the other characters who learnt nothing and carried on in an inevitable downward spiral.

The vista was beautifully painted as we imagined the Australian outback with its open spaces and the claustrophobic drawing rooms in England.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 21 November 2014
excellent book,still don't understand why the author used 2 separate stories very little related,personally I wished he had centred the entire text on the Tasmanian life and times around 1700-1800.Nevertheless he crafted his story very well and held the interest of the reader all the way.
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 5 November 2014
An interesting imaginary 'historic' novel but not as good as The Narrow Road to the Deep North
One person found this helpful
|0Comment|Report abuse
on 25 April 2015
I really enjoyed this book and it led me to look up many of the facts mentioned. I wifi be purchasing more of this author's work. Very informative and a truly stimulating read
|0Comment|Report abuse

Customers also viewed these items

First Person

Need customer service? Click here