Learn more Shop now Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Amazon Music Unlimited for Family Shop now Fitbit

Customer Reviews

4.1 out of 5 stars
31
4.1 out of 5 stars
Format: Paperback|Change
Price:£9.99+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 6 September 2016
A generally interesting perspective of the Bosnian war, through the authors own senses. I enjoyed reading it overall, although sometimes its ebb and flow felt a bit erratic, probably due to the conditions under which it was written. I did find it required a certain level of background knowledge which I didn't have, so numerous trips to Wikipedia were necessary.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 May 2017
I found this book interesting but for me it didn't live up to its reviews.
Maybe my expectations were wrong but too often it became about the author and not the events.
Still worth the read though.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 26 April 2017
stii reading all books
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 4 April 2016
Well Written
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
This book was first published in 1995, a few months before the war ended; a second edition followed in 1996. This 2012 edition is a revised and updated version. Martin Bell states 'I wrote this book of instant history because I felt it would not wait and would better be written by someone who was there. Historians are seldom eyewitnesses. I know two things now that I did not know then. One is the body count... we now know that some 98,000 people were killed in the course of that war...'

He writes about UN soldiers being horrified by both what they saw and by being unable to do anything about it - for example, standing by as Sarajevo was destroyed by Serb artillery.

This was the first satellite TV war - pictures beamed straight from the war zone critically without censorship. As a result it put tremendous pressure on the British government to intervene. Initially it resisted - Douglas Hurd is quoted as saying 'There is nothing new in such misery. There is nothing new in mass rape, in the shooting of civilians, in war crimes, in ethnic cleansing, in the burning of town and villages. What is new is that a selection of these tragedies is now visible within hours to people around the world'. The author quotes G K Chesterton, who was obviously not talking about satellite TV at the time but might as well have been: 'It's not the world that has got so much worse but the news coverage that has got so much better'.

Mr Bell reports on the horrors of the war - the atrocities by both sides; the targeting of civilians by snipers; the relentless artillery bombardments; and the relief brought by fog because snipers could not operate. There are memorable quotes such as 'the Serbs seemed to model themselves on the old Western gunslinger Wild Bill Hickok: he was said never to have killed a man except in self-defence, but to have spent a great deal of his time defending himself. And the Serbs weren't waiting to be attacked, they got their retaliation in first... Hardly a mosque was left standing. This was planned and deliberate.'

This links to something I was unaware of - 'two of the nineteen 9/11 hijackers, in their martyrdom videos, gave the war in Bosnia as one of their reasons for signing on. So there was actually a linkage between the siege of Sarajevo and the destruction of the Twin Towers'.

This is a fascinating book on the Bosnian war and its significance, told by Mr Bell in a self-deprecating manner. He is not only an Honourable man but an honourable man and it is a shame that he is no longer an MP.
0Comment| 14 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 1 November 2012
Martin Bell was the BBC's principal television correspondence during the Bosnian war between 1991 and 1995 and he was an eye witness to the greatest period of bloodletting in Europe since the second world war and most sadly it was a war that need not have happened. His superb book not only tells the fascinating story of his own experiences on the front line but reveals the causes of the war and describes some of the personalities involved. He became a familiar figure to TV audiences with his white suit and his calm delivery of shocking events including the massacres at Srebenica and Ahmici and the long siege of Sarajevo. One of his most famous television reports from Bosnia included him being wounded by a sniper.

His book shows his admiration for the soldiers posted there who had an impossible job in the conflict who because of their rules of engagement were prevented from intervening in the fighting to help people and who had no choice but to be passive bystanders to many horrendous events including ethnic cleansing and massacres. It was a war of incredible intensity and cruelty especially for civilians where hatred between Serbs, Croats and Muslims, many of whom had previously lived beside each other in peace and harmony lead to events that shocked Europe whose inhabitants had come to believe that the kind of things that took place between 1939 and 1945 could not possibly happen again in their continent.

Bell produces many valuable insights about the war and how it was covered by correspondents and he does so with self effacing humour and great humanity. It is a great read and anyone interested in the war in the former Yugoslavia and how the story was told to the world must read it to get a balanced view of the conflict whose consequences are still very much apparent in this unhappy and unsettled area of Europe.
0Comment| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 9 June 2012
This is not actually a new book but a revised and updated edition of the same which was originally released in 1995 (and revised in 1996). It has been released to mark the 20th anniversary of the outbreak of hostilities.

The original book was written during the period covered by the book during the Bosnian conflict of 92-95 and covers Martin's experiences there with a far amount of divergence along the way.

Martin Bell was a BBC TV war reporter for many years and covered wars all across the world, famously wearing a white suit whilst doing so and collecting a fragment of mortar shell in the process of filming in Bosnia. He did his National Service in the late 50's in the Suffolk Regiment and is still proud of his affiliation to them. His affection feelings towards British soldiers comes through consistently in the book.

In Harm's Way is not a history book of the conflict, in fact there is little background given to the start of the war, and within each chapter there can be a bit of jumping back and forth chronologically. This is probably explained that when written the events would have been very fresh in the minds of readers. Now however, trying to recall the sequences of the various Balkan conflicts around that time is not so clear (even to a Cold War Warrior who was on 48 hours notice to deploy there at one point).

I think one aspect of the book that immediately hits you is the number of the media who were wounded and killed during this conflict. This is explained as a relatively new thing as the past they were mainly protected from harm. However the indiscriminatory nature of this war did away with that coupled with the desire for more and more reports direct from the front line.

Martin holds back no punches when he describes how he feels about the UN involvement particularly how ineffective it was as a peacekeeper force, failing to maintain safe zones and concentrating almost on just ensuring aid conveys got through so that the civilians could be fed when they were killed! He quite succinctly describes the failings around multiple nationalities working together as a joint force when they are responding to both local commands and to their own governments back home..

Colonel Bob Stewart obviously made a huge impression on the author during his time in Bosnia together with the Cheshires. He devotes a chapter to him and defends him against the criticism he received at the time. He again spends time describing some of the elements around various commanders such as Generals Rose and Smith which led to their various trials and tribulations whilst trying to maintain peace, or a least confine the fighting.

I enjoyed the book, it makes you think about what the actual role of the UN is and what part nations should play in protecting the civilians of others. Are the lives of a few of our soldiers worth many civilians from somewhere else? It is a constant question that arises even now. (and I suspect may be an ulterior motive behind the re-release of the book) One gets the impression that Martin Bell definitely believes that the sacrifices of the armed services are made for good causes and that it should continue as such.

This message is especially true given the current circumstances in places such as Afghanistan and Syria.
0Comment| 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 4 September 2015
As a war correspondent Mr Bell saw the tragic events of the Bosnian war unfold, and reported them to millions of viewers back in the UK. His professional reports did not show his anger and frustration at the lost opportunities to bring peace. Neither did they show the people in his team who made the reports possible. ‘In Harm’s Way’ addresses these omissions.

Mr Bell explains the causes of the war, the frustrations of the UN forces on the ground, the hatred which led to ethnic cleansing on both sides. This book is not an easy read, but it was never meant to be. It is a report on the horrors of modern warfare, the tragedy of civilian casualties, the depravation of besieged cities. Through it all Mr Bell is non-partisan, chronicling atrocities committed by all sides as he seeks to answer key questions. Why was this war allowed to happen? Why was nothing done to stop it sooner? What is the role of the UN?

‘In Harm’s Way’ also gives us an insight into the life of a war reporter. It is not just about standing in front of a camera for a couple of minutes twice a day; it involves real hardship, and real danger. Mr Bell himself was wounded, as were a number of his colleagues. Others lost their lives.

If you are interested in history, journalism or politics; if you enjoy a good biography, then ‘In Harm’s Way’ is a must read.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 16 August 2012
What an amazing book. Martin gives so much of the background of the Bosnian War at first hand experience. It shows how difficult it is, even for an experienced reporter, to try to give an even handed account of what happened. He puts himself in danger's path by getting first hand information from both sides and through his writing gives a real feeling of being amongst all the mayhem, confusion, and horror of the war. The world is a better, and more informed, place because people like him put themselves in danger in search of the Truth for us. He never loses sight of his concern for those caught up in the war - he is there to report and inform. A humble knight in a white suit.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 23 December 2014
I read this to find out more about the war in Bosnia but the book is actually a very long description of modern war reporting. As such it talks at length about the limits of technology, different networks approaches to reporting, the practicalities of reporting from war zones (road blocks, accommodation, transport, multi-skilled news teams) and the limits of what can be shown and said; either due to what might be described as "good taste" or because most of the time the journalist on the ground simply isn't, or can't be, in the right place at the right time.

As such I found it oddly repetitive and unsatisfactory. Once you've read that atrocities were committed by all combatants in Bosnia and that journalists get shot at too there didn't seem a lot more to it than to reiterate that Bosnia was a hugely confusing conflict from which practically no one emerged with much credit.

I think a little more straight history of the war, its context, course and outcomes, would have helped along with more analysis on the motivations and objectives of the key players.
Instead, Martin Bell seems so determined to demonstrate the limitations of "war reporting from the man on science's perspective" that you're left feeling almost as frustrated at not seeing the bigger picture as he must have been at the time.

To borrow a much over used sentiment from the book: someone's shooting but we don't know why, who or where from so for all the good we're doing we may as well get the he'll out of here!
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)