Top critical review
4 people found this helpful
Very poor indeed and from a "historian"?
on 28 August 2014
Appallingly poorly written. In places it reads like a poor O Level history essay and at others like he has just transcribed bare notes without any thought. Also, I have never come across a published work which contains such ridiculous and breathtakingly careless amounts of typos. There are so many of all kinds it beggars belief - every paragraph! And, it appears that punctuation is a complete mystery to the author. I was so frustrated with the thing I threw it away. If self published, please spend some valuable time proof-reading!