Top critical review
2 people found this helpful
The standard of printing isn't very good (legible, but poor quality)
on 22 July 2014
As another commenter said - the latest edition available is 1968 - hence it is rather outdated. I also found that some of the words have been put in an appendix (ie rather than put in their correct position in the dictionary). The standard of printing isn't very good (legible, but poor quality). On checking some of the words - in the Appendix, for instance, there are some words that don't have the English equivalent given. Other words have given an incorrect English word. As an English person, I was surprised to see that extrovert is spelt "extravert", arosod apparently means "to superpose" (I presume they mean "to superimpose"?) for instance. Some words that definitely did exist in 1968 and are in every dictionary aren't in this dictionary (even though many words I've never heard of are) and I suspect a bit of censoring has gone on due to the authors' personal preferences (ie rather than there having been an objective assessment of what words should go in).
All in all - not a very good dictionary at all and a better one needs to be written by someone else. I had to buy it because that was about all there was in a reasonable size dictionary - but I wouldn't have bought it if there had been a decent one available.
Anyone care to write an up-to-date/non-judgemental/decently-printed one (checking, of course, that they speak the perfect English necessary to write it - as well as perfect Welsh)?