Top critical review
4 people found this helpful
Not all that
on 10 January 2017
I'll start by saying I am unsure how this book has received so many five star comments. Was I reading the same book?
The punctuation, sentence formation and editing is dire. As an identification book, it is useless.
Content wise, it could probably be slashed to a third of its size by removing its meaningless waffle.
The odd snippets of information save it from getting just one star. That said, sources are all but absent. I suspect the author made a lot of it up or is one of those people who "heard or from so and so, so it must be right".
You'll find more reliable information on Wikipedia than this book.