Top critical review
One person found this helpful
nothing new here... move along.
on 13 September 2012
This is well written but pointless book. Often it illustrates the obvious and is written with huge bias. It is not a "guide to the debate". For there clearly is for alarmists "no debate to be had". The vast majority of skeptics want to debate the science and most accept we could be causing the climate to shift in the short or medium term. But you can not have a debate with scientists that accept a scenario as fact yet use words like "suggests", "may", "could" , "likely" , "possible"... I expected so much more from this book but it was very disappointing.