Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Learn more Click Here Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now

Customer reviews

3.7 out of 5 stars
6
3.7 out of 5 stars


There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

… and still counting. With an error range of plus or minus five million. That is the current rough estimate of the number of people who have died from the AIDS epidemic. Jacques Pepin’s estimate is 29 million, but that was made a half decade ago, when this impressive work was published. It is a pandemic. Though the overall numbers have yet to reach the numbers who died during the Black Death plague of the 14th century or the Influenza of 1918-19, they are in the same league. The AIDS epidemic / pandemic distinguishes itself from the other two in a number of ways: it impacts certain “marginalized” groups of the population the most, and the prime preventive measure is “falling off a log” simple – it is getting people to actually do it.

Jacques Pepin – not to be confused with a more famous chef with the same name – is currently a Professor of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases at the Universite de Sherbrooke in Canada. He spent four years working at a “bush hospital,” 500 km northeast of the capital, Kinshasa, (once called Leopoldville) in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. Where did AIDS come from? And how did it spread? These are the essential epidemiological questions. Pepin provides a lucid, solid, well-reasoned account. It is written at a technical level that is suitable for physicians and other specialists in the field of AIDS, but he also takes care to provide explanations of technical terms, as well as his reasoning, so that his account is accessible to educated and concerned non-medical readers. It is a work in the field of public health, and therefore Pepin’s account also provides an outstanding analysis of the historical and social conditions which caused AIDS, which could have existed in humans for hundreds of years, to suddenly explode into a global pandemic, aided, in part, by substantial dollops of human folly.

It started with chimpanzees. In Africa. Not any chimpanzees, but a particular subset, with the rather odd scientific name of “pan troglodyte troglodyte.” Chimps cannot swim rivers, so the geographic area of central Africa was rather well-defined. For hundreds of years certain members of this subset had the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) which is identical to the HIV-1 virus. How they got it is “beyond the scope of this course” as they used to say in college, and probably still do. It may have crossed over to humans during that course of time, but met an “epidemiological dead end,” meaning it did not spread, and died out with the host. Pepin calculates that the one “crossover” event for the modern pandemic occurred in 1921, with an error factor of more than a decade. Such estimates are possible by knowing the rate of change in the mutations of the genetic sequence of the virus, and applying some back calculations.

What made it take off? First, there were guns! Chimps are clever, and hard to hunt without guns, and thus the availability made that one crossover event, around the year 1921, much more likely. Then there were two other major factors that made it spread. One involved the unintended consequences of French and Belgian colonial health care policies (the two main areas where the “ptt” chimps lived – the Belgian Congo, and three of the four countries of French Equatorial Africa.) The focus of this policy was the elimination of trypanosomiasis (sleeping sickness) and yaws. In the French areas, they used mobile teams, a concept promoted by one of the “giants” in the field, Eugene Jamot. But both with the French and Belgian approaches was the use and re-use of syringes and needles, without proper sterilization (because its importance was not realized, and even if it was, autoclaves don’t work without electric power). Thus, the source for many a new case was iatrogenic – the word that denotes that a disease was contracted through the health care procedures.

The other major factor was the rise of prostitution. Colonial policy required the “labor” of the natives, for building railroads, and fighting wars, etc. Men concentrated in the cities, creating a huge imbalance vis-à-vis the women, and the former’s sexual needs would be met via a class of women who sold their services, sometimes at the rate of a thousand “clients” a year.

“Globalization” forces presented the opportunities for HIV-1 to spread from central Africa to China and Thailand. One of the unusual modes of transmission was another by-product of Belgian colonial policy: there was no native educated class to take over, after the sudden independence of the Congo in 1960. Thus, the new government had to import many teachers from Haiti, and they brought HIV-1 back to the Western hemisphere. Two other sharply disparate factors: gay sex tourism to Haiti, and the company, “Hemo-Caribbean” which prepared much of the plasma for western countries, and was drawn from poor (infected) Haitians, and was operated by Luckner Cambronne, the head of the Tonton Macoutes (Papa Doc’s secret police), were two enormous vectors that spread the disease beyond this one impoverished country.

There is much else, including the different course of HIV-2, which spread from the epi-center of Guinea-Bissau, former Portuguese Guinea. Pepin’s account is overwhelmingly “dry” and scientific, with numerous graphs, yet he leavens it with wry commentary on social conditions. Concerning Dr. Jonathan Mann, another “giant” in the AIDS field, and who died in the crash of SwissAir 111 in 1998, he says of Mann’s outlook: “Since AIDS was linked to poverty, injustice, exploitation, vulnerability and all kinds of inequities, all these determinants of the epidemic needed to be addressed simultaneously. This was dreaming in technicolour.”

The only statement of Pepin’s that I would take issue with is on page 174: “While soldiers stationed in peaceful countries certainly tend to frequent sex workers and acquire STDs, there is little evidence that such prostitution occurs close to combat areas.” (!) Au contraire, as evidenced by French military mobile bordellos… among much else.

Overall, Jacques Pepin has written an excellent scientific account of the origins of AIDS. He is a mix of scientist, historian, sociologist and detective. For that slender sub-group, the wise, it would be an excellent text to prepare for the next pandemic. 6-stars.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 18 April 2012
In "The Origins of AIDS" Jacques Pepin, an expert in infectious diseases who has spent many years working in Africa, explains how HIV spread from a few cases in the Congo in the 1920s to the pandemic it is today.

The story begins with SIV (Simian Immunodeficiency Virus) which is present in chimpanzees and is genetically identical to HIV. It is thought that SIV originated in chimps about 300 years ago and was transmitted to humans by cut hunters or cooks who butchered the animals. Then in about the 1920s someone infected in this way had the opportunity to spread the virus more extensively. Pepin argues that two factors allowed for the amplification of HIV: urbanization with an attendant increase in prostitution, and most significantly massive colonial disease eradication projects which resulted in mobile units injecting hundreds of people an hour with insufficiently sterilized needles. From here HIV steadily became more prevalent until one infected Haitian introduced the disease to their country precipitating (via the plasma industry) an epidemic which eventually spread to the US and the world.

Scientists are pretty certain about some of the steps in this story, others are more conjectural; however, Pepin builds a convincing argument with plenty of context and comparable examples. One does not have to have a scientific background to understand his argument and this is, for the most part, a readable book which fills a gap in the literature on AIDS. My only criticism would be with Pepin's overuse of exclamation marks (e.g. "Approximately 250,000 paid donors (a quarter of a million!) acquired HIV.") which is indicative of a wider problem of tone.

How SIV originated in chimps is outside the scope of the book, as is the history of AIDS from the eighties and the personal experiences of AIDS sufferers. For those interested in the early history of AIDS in the US, I would recommend Randy Shilts's excellent And the Band Played On: Politics, People, and the AIDS Epidemic.
0Comment| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 24 October 2011
Despite its academic nature this book is a page-turner, you will enjoy it like a really brilliant CSI episode. Dr. Jacques Pépin was quite successful in writing a book that reaches both academics and the laymen. Until now all the serious discussions and theories about the origins of the AIDS pandemic had been limited to academic journals. The book point of departure is based on these research findings, which are presented in the first chapters, and provide a comprehensive and very good summary of the state-of-the-art for the laymen. The reader shouldn't be intimated by some technical language, as the book was written for all audiences and the author did the extra work of explaining medical jargon for the general public when required, and anyway, most of the times you do not need to remember all of it to fully grasp the main storyline (just keep in mind a few key concepts, particularly the definition of HIV-1 group M, and subgroups B and C). Also from the start, Dr. Pépin debunks the two most common theories that tried to explain the origin of the AIDS pandemic.

After a very impressive Sherlock Holmes-like detective work through historical records, Dr. Pépin develops a very plausible explanation, going back to the colonial era in the early 1900s all the way to the early 1980s, with very solid theory, based on both circumstantial and hard evidence, following the path of the virus from Africa, to Haiti, and to the U.S., Europe and the rest of the world. The author did not intended to go any further, as the history and evolution of AIDS has been already covered by several authors.

The evolution of this pandemic illustrates one more time the unintended and even disastrous consequences of good intentions, and also, how medicine works and evolves in the real world. I do not wish to comment on the details of Dr. Pépin findings to avoid spoiling the story, but if you really need to know beforehand, take a look at the New York Times recently published article about Dr. Pépin's contribution, which tells the whole story in a nutshell.
0Comment| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 5 June 2013
This book as it says in the title looks into where AIDS comes and how scientist came to their conclusion. This is a very well structured and well written book. A very interesting an informative read.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 November 2013
FOR SOMEONE WHO HAS LIVED THROUGH THE EPIDEMIC AND HAS REMAINED HIV NEG I FIND THIS BOOK PURELY A POINT OF VIEW WITH LITTLE FACT.THE THEORY THAT IF UR ANCESTORS SURVIVED THE BLACK DEATH AND THAT U WOULD HAVE IMMUNITY ISNT EVEN MENTIONED .G WATCHED MANY MANY OF MY DEAR FRIENDS DIE IN TERRIBLE WAYS IN THE 80S 90S MEDICAL STAFF WERE AFRAID .UNDERTAKERS WERE AFRAID .HOW DO THESE PEOPLE FEEL NOW? THEY MUST BE RACKED WITH GUILT.THIS BK IS BEST AVOIDED
11 Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 6 November 2012
Any one who reads this book has to understand that what is presented here is merely a theory.

A friend once remarked that" ... IF AIDS really did originate in Africa, surely the population of the continent would
have been COMPLETELY DECIMATED by now (given the poor, primitive and pathetic medical facilities generally
available - together with the very promiscuous nature of some of its people)".

This seems like common sense. making it hard to accept the conclusion of this theory (and others) as to the African
origin of the disease.

There are other theories of the origin of the disease that must be explored since the theory of its African origin seems
to me, at any rate, to be merely a convenient 'carpet' to brush things under.
22 Comments|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)