Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Learn more Click Here Shop Kindle New Album - Foo Fighters Shop now Shop now



There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 29 May 2017
A great selection of Scriptures that didn't made it into the New Testament, a great read of different epistles, gospels & letters for research purposes
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 5 June 2015
Interesting stuff. You can make up your own mind whether or not to accept this material.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 16 September 2004
This book contains 26 literary works from the early Christian Church. These "books" were extant in the early Church, but when the New Testament was officially organized into Canon Scripture (officially accepted books), these were among those left behind. This book was originally published in 1890, reprinted in 1926, and again in 1979.
As one might expect with any collection of stories, this one is a mixed bag of good and bad stories. Some of these works are long and tedious, while some are short and don't seem to contain anything new. However, all of them allow a fascinating glimpse into the thoughts of various factions within the early Church.
Personally, I enjoyed The Epistles of Paul the Apostle to Seneca, with Seneca's to Paul, and the Epistles of Clement. I highly enjoyed this book and recommend it to you.
0Comment| 116 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
HALL OF FAMEon 6 January 2006
There is something somewhat misleading about the title of this book - in fact, most of the selections contained in this book are not 'lost' documents at all. For example, the Dead Sea Scrolls (which are not contained in this book) were well and truly lost - they were buried for centuries, and those who buried them did not leave notice of where they were in any way that survived; hence, when they were found, they were truly recovered from having been lost. What makes the documents in this book 'lost' contextually is that they were not included in the canon of the New Testament texts.
In the early church, there was no consistent agreement about what belonged in the Bible and what was not to be included. Modern-day readers of books such as the 'Da Vinci Code' can understand some of the issues and dilemmas here - there were no printing presses, no consistency of library cataloging or copyrighting, and no central authority in the oft-persecuted church as to who could make a decision of what texts were valuable. Indeed, even the Hebrew scriptures existed in variations, and the modern day issue of apocryphal books included or not included in the Bible stems from the difference between the Greek and Hebrew translations of the Hebrew scriptures/Old Testament texts.
For example, the book of the Shepherd of Hermas, included here, was well known to the early church, and continued to be a document known to church historians and scholars in the subsequent centuries, even if it was not commonly known and read by the laity in the churches. The apostle Paul was far from the only letter writer of the early church; the New Testament includes some other letters (Peter, John, etc.), but the canonical decision at one point was made that only those attributed to the original twelve apostles and Paul would be included - the letters of Clement, very important and useful in the early church, were excluded from the canon.
However, there is an important point to be made here. Just because something was not included in the canon of scripture did not mean that it was worthless. Just because a student gets an A rather than an A+ does not mean that student did not do good and worthwhile work. Many of these texts were 'A' texts for the early church, but lacked that certain something that made them canonical. The same is true for the gospels - this collection includes some extra-canonical gospel texts, and the reason for their non-inclusion in the canon is varied, but does not mean their value is insignificant.
There has been much work done on early church documentary history and the development of the canon since this book was first published more than a century ago, but these are reasonable (if not always reader-friendly) translations of relatively unknown texts, useful for general readers and undergraduates, or those who might want to know what the early Christians were reading and being influenced by apart from the canonical text.
11 Comment| 130 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 16 July 2010
Although the book has interesting 'books' in it, I had not read the reviews prior to purchase (I have found most reviews of other books to be so different from my experience I usually don't bother).
I was therefore very disappointed to find that discoveries in the last 84 years were not there.
There are other books about the 'books' which were omitted from the bible which are much more up to date.
Nonetheless worth having on its own terms.
0Comment| 17 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 24 December 2010
I found this a very useful bacvkground reading to my Bible Studies.
It is comprehensive [for a paperback] an gave me all the information I needed. It also provided a use feading list
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 10 December 1997
An incredible resource for all Christians. Gospel of Nicodemus gives incredible insight to events surrounding the Crucifixion. Very insightful works also attributed to Clement, Barnabas, Hermas and letters sent between Herod and Pilate.
0Comment| 79 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 6 August 2013
I really found this book fascinating as it contains some books which aren't included in the King James Bible, For any one interested in Theology this is the book for you .
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 14 November 2013
There were aspects of the book which I could not go along with (in one chapter Jesus comes over as a precocious, horrible child). However, some chapters were believable.
11 Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 20 July 2011
A fascinating collection of 'epistles' and letters, excellently presented. A great insight into many documents that didn't make it into the Authorised Collection of the Bible - and in many cases, one can understand why !
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)