Top critical review
3 people found this helpful
I must have the wrong document... and a troubling fact
on 9 May 2016
When I downloaded the commission report and first looked through it, I was convinced I must have the wrong document. This could not possibly be the incisive review of all the events of 9/11, particularly as to what precisely occurred.
And of course it isn't, nor is it intended to be, so it has the role of electronic toilet paper.
In addition to the abundance of material (eg: New Pearl Harbor) out there, I would offer one simple analysis that will eliminate any possible belief that either a B757 hit the Pentagon as described, or that the US Government told the truth.
The US DoD when it released the security gate camera images and used them in US vs Moussaouri achieved three unintentional goals:
a) it proved that the government lied by about 90 degrees as to the path of the vehicle
b) it proved that the government lied about the presence of a B757 as being the vehicle involved
c) it involved itself in a criminal act by tampering with evidence in a criminal trial, itself a criminal offence
The 'vehicle' in the forward gate cam shot isn't a vehicle, but smoke. There is no vehicle. The image is a composite with the vehicle edited out.
For the only proof you'll need, courtesy of the US DoD, see "9/11 Pentagon Flight 77: Creating a New Pearl Harbor"
9/11 Pentagon Flight 77: Creating a New Pearl Harbor: The only proof you need, authorized and published by the US DoD