Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Learn more Click Here Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Shop now



There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 23 September 2016
What a relief finally to get down to understanding ourselves through and with our brains. Dr McGilchrist is a psychiatric practitioner with a clear understanding of the latest research on the brain and a mastery of how it (the brain) has led the world to its present pass. The question then becomes, how can we provoke our brains to think in such a way that we can bring a better world into being. 'The Master' is the righthand hemisphere, 'His Emissary' is the left. Jung wrote that 'Eternal truth needs a human language that alters with the spirit of the times...’ The Master & The Emissary delivers!
0Comment| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 13 July 2011
The layout of the book is an example of the point it is trying to make: one half is an analytical study about the workings of the brain, the other half is a description about how that relates to experience as a whole. After a fascinating journey through the workings of the mind (the right hemisphere 'thinking style' sees the whole and passes part of this information for the left hemisphere's focused mode, after which this detail is re-integrated back into the original picture), the author describes how examples from art, culture, society, literature etc. provide an insight into how this arrangement has failed in various ways during critical epochs in human history. In a nutshell, the 'left hemisphere mode' can become too self-referential and instead of being an 'emissary' providing one part of a vital process, it sees itself as 'the master'. From this style of thinking, all sorts of difficulties arise, with implications for the western cultural tradition as well as globally. This is a basic word or two on what is actually a beautiful and well-thought through read. The author is well-versed in a range of disciplines and from this background he has produced something special and thought provoking. This book required attention, re-reading of some passages and reflection, but it was well worth the effort: it makes you look at the world in a different light.
0Comment| 12 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
I've just finished reading this impressive piece of work and I feel that what I have read is the answer to 4000 years of human struggles, epic mistakes and blind alleys. I can now imagine how those Victorian flat-earthers felt like after reading Darwin's Origin of the Species for the first time and thinking, as T. H Huxley did, "how extremely stupid not to have thought of that!"

The answerers slot into place, once someone smart enough comes along to solve the puzzle. I am not exaggerating when I say that the way Darwin solved the mystery of the Giraffe, Iain McGilchrist has solved the mystery of our wretched state. I am not saying that McGilchrist is some sort of Albert Einstein, no, because the answer has been starring us in the face, like natural selection did, we just needed a very clever chap to come along, who happened to work with patients but who was also a dab hand at philosophy, and, most importantly, had the latest brain research at hand. Indeed, McGilchrist does not spin his ideas from first principle, but from solid brain imaging and years of first hand study on real sick people.

(not only is Iain McGilchrist a top hands-on researcher, who worked for years with real patients, rather than abstractions from the citadels of the ivory tower. McGilchrist has also read very widely and and he understands what he has read and so he is a true philosopher and this is why academic philosophers have been giving this book average reviews.)

McGilchrist is on to something here and intelligence roars out of the pages of The Master and his Emissary. It is the architectonics of the brain that is the problem and not the world etc and there is enough proof for even the diehard genetic determinists to accept. Can I suggest a similar book call Left in the Dark? It basically covered similar territory to this one.

These are exciting times!
0Comment| 6 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 7 December 2016
Densely rich and fascinating. A wonderful review of how neuroscience can inform an understanding our our nature as human beings and the world we create.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 1 January 2017
Extremely difficult and complex book but very interesting: Professor Macgilchrist is a considerable scholar and polymath and a fellow of All Souls College, Oxford. I have heard him lecture. A fascinating writer and speaker.
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 9 June 2017
quick delivery. great read
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 18 July 2017
Hard work but totally brilliant. I would have been much better if I could have afforded the hard back version
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
As a student of philosophy I have always been particularly interested in the contrasting attitudes of Romanticism and Rationalism, and it was an absolute revelation to me to read in this book that almost all the perceptions of Romanticism originate in the right hemisphere of the brain while the methods of Rationalism are processed by the left hemisphere. In the first half of his book, McGilchrist shows us in great detail the several ways in which neurological science can demonstrate this, for instance by describing the thought processes when one or the other side of the brain is physically damaged.

The most fundamental difference between the two hemispheres is that the origin of all experience is in the right half. That experience sees everything in its environment, is holistic, intuitive and profound, but it is unfocussed and indistinct. To focus on the details of the experience, to analyze it, is the task of the left. Ideally the detailed picture then returns to the right half, so that the details become integrated with and enrich the wider picture. The traffic between the two hemispheres is principally via the corpus callosum, the tissues which join them at their base.

The left half uses language precisely; the right can see can see layers of meaning, understands metaphors and jokes. The right is responsible for our personal and social relationship with others, for empathy and empathetic imitation, for picking up the meaning of facial expressions, gestures, and tone of voice, for most of our emotional life and for our response to music, poetry, the spiritual dimension of life. It is the locus of moral judgment. It experiences the past, the present and the future as a continuum. The left is instrumental; it organizes, manipulates and controls details for a purpose. It measures, classifies and creates abstractions. It aims for internal consistency. Awareness of new things in the world belong to the right; the left processes and explicates what it receives from the right, and in that sense does not create anything new itself: it only works on what is already known to it.

Without the work of the left, civilization would be impossible; but when the right is neglected, the left becomes detached from everything that is holistic and profound. The left and the right, different and even conflicting though they are, should always complement each other in a creative tension, should have a dialectical relationship with each other like that of thesis, antithesis and synthesis. They achieve this when there is "negative feedback" between them, when they check each other. But the left hemisphere is particularly prone to "positive feedback", is a "hall of mirrors" where its contents reinforce each other and produce a "virtual reality".

Philosophy itself, which is essentially concerned with analysis and close examination, has a strong predisposition to privilege the left, which it takes a stupendous effort by some philosophers like Spinoza, Nietzsche or Heidegger to overcome. Scientists run a similar danger, and even neurologists have until recently described the right hemisphere as "minor", "silent", or "coarse" and the left as "dominant" or "smart". McGilchrist is in no doubt that the right hemisphere should be the Master, the left merely its Emissary, albeit as such a valued one.

In the second half of the book McGilchrist analyzes the phases of Western civilization in terms of whether they are right- or left-hemisphere dominated. (He allows for more exceptions than my summary suggests.) He agrees with Nietzsche that left domination began with Socrates and Plato. It was intensified in the Roman Empire. Christendom began with the spiritual insights we associate with the right, but degenerated into abstract theological formulations which imposed uniformity wherever it could. The Renaissance was overwhelmingly right-hemisphere dominated; but then the Reformation reverted to left-hemisphere thought. (McGilchrist's unduly negative attitude to the Reformation strikes me as the weakest part of the book.) The Enlightenment and the French Revolution of course are massively left-oriented; and on several occasions he mentions that Descartes, the founder of the Age of Reason (or rather of the Age of Rationality) exhibited thought processes which have much in common with schizophrenics. In Romanticism we then have a brief period of right-hemisphere dominance. McGilchrist taught English Literature at Oxford before he re-trained as a neurologist; and his analysis (NB) of Romantic Literature is superb and much the best part of this second part. Then, alas, comes the Industrial Revolution with its one-sided materialism and scientism, manipulating life in a way which is the fulfilment of the left-hemisphere's ambitions. And even that was not the end: Modernism comes along, whose characteristics are fragmentation of reality (see Cubism, Surrealism, abstract art etc; dissonance without resolution into harmony in much of modern music, deconstruction in literature) in much the way in which schizophrenics experience fragmented reality, and this bring all sorts of other consequences: a loss of meaning and significance, resulting sometimes in Angst, sometimes in boredom, which in turn requires more and more strident or shocking expression. For the sanity of western civilization, we badly need to restore the primacy of the right-hemisphere, not least by looking at the more holistic attitudes McGilchrist sees in Eastern civilization.

There are suggestive sentences or brilliant formulations on almost every page, although there is also a good deal of repetition in this very long book. Despite McGilchrist's comments that, in its proper role, the left hemisphere does indispensable and valuable work, the tone is constantly negative about it. There is, for example, nothing about the left hemisphere checking rather than supplementing what the right hemisphere may be doing in the way of blind emotion. Dare I say that there is even a left-hemisphere tinge to the overall pattern of McGilchrist's analysis? I was, however, left with my view of the world having been greatly enriched by this learned and immensely stimulating book.
33 Comments| 39 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
Whether you're a left brainer or a right brainer, it's a no brainer when it comes to reading this book - an extraordinary intellectual achievement - and on p159 it even tells you how to make mayonnaise!
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 12 March 2017
After using neurology, neuroscience and psychiatry to explain Heiddeger, Hegel, Nietzsche, and Wittgenstein, and thus why a fragmented, decontextualized, devitalized, and self-referential worldview will only lead to meaninglessness and inauthenticity, and ultimately "a distinctive combination of superiority and impotence", the author then canvasses the trajectory of Western cultural evolution and social changes, citing in particular philosophy, paintings and poetry to illustrate his thesis. Through the Balwin effect, the left hemisphere, the eponymous emissary of the book, has transformed our world into a post-modernist void, usurping its master, the right hemisphere, which connects to the real world and is the root of insight and love/agape. The implicit theological and soteriological implications of this dense book are profound. Four and a half stars.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)