Learn more Shop now Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Amazon Music Unlimited for Family Learn more Fitbit

Customer reviews

4.0 out of 5 stars
2
4.0 out of 5 stars
5 star
1
4 star
0
3 star
1
2 star
0
1 star
0

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

VINE VOICEon 19 May 2017
Why an Age of Tyrants?
Well so said Gildas (the title quote above) after Jerome's cataloguing of Britannia as "a province fertile in tyrants".
Unlike many books about 'Dark Age Britain' this is not a book in which the historian is pushing a particular thesis, and it is all the better for that.
Too much of the historigraphy of this fuzzy period in British/English history has been characterized by academics (never mind all the others in search of you-know-who and his band from Camelot) shouting at each other.
Snyder's book is packed with data and information from sites across the country, which is very useful if you are a layman like me who doesn't get to hang out with archaeologists when they write up their reports). I particularly enjoy the gazetteer section on sites of sub-Roman Britain. And yes, he does discuss Arthur (and Merlin) eventually in an appendix!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
Snyder opens with a short section describing the known history of Britain in the 4th century up to about 410. The second section begins with a discussion of the literary evidence available for 400-600, leading into a series of chapters discussing the meaning of terms used in the literature: 'Britannia', 'patria', 'Britanni', 'cives', 'reges', 'tyranni' and others.

Section three considers the archaeology, before section four supposedly synthesises the previous two sections. Personally I totally failed to see the argument presented, if indeed there was one. Snyder declares himself in sympathy with the "positivists" trying to reconstruct some sort of detail as opposed to the "reductionists" who say that nothing can be said for certain, but I must have missed his conclusions altogether.

He seems as far as I can ascertain to think that the Britons threw off Roman government (so in agreement for example with Jones' The End of Roman Britain); that urban life continued in many towns (thus in agreement with Dark's Britain and the End of the Roman Empire and White's Britannia Prima: The Romans in the West of Britain and against Esmonde Cleary's The Ending of Roman Britain and Faulkner's The Decline and Fall of Roman Britain); that despite political fragmentation Britons had a sense of Britishness (as against Laycock's Britannia - The Failed State: Tribal Conflict and the End of Roman Britain and Warlords: The Struggle for Power in Post-Roman Britain); but it all seems a bit vague.

Packed with information and therefore useful for students of the period, but too fuzzy in its conclusions for me to rate it highly.
11 Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse



Need customer service? Click here

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)