Shop now Shop now Shop now See more Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

3.2 out of 5 stars
3.2 out of 5 stars
Format: Paperback|Change
Price:£8.12+ Free shipping with Amazon Prime
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 31 August 2007
On this book scores very highly, with all the reviews (with the exception of one repeated review) being 4 or 5 stars. This makes me think, maybe Americans could care less about the "tone" of the prose. I mean, come on! Someone is writing about the laws of quantum mechanics, which may well be fundamental to every physical phenomenon, and all you care about is the prose?

Target audience is always a problem with popular science books and this is no exception. Not everything can be explained simply. The discussion of the interpretation of quantum mechanics is confused and confusing, but then, so is much of the relevant literature (I myself don't see what's wrong with "shut up and calculate").

The discussion of arithmetic is particularly confused, because it is never made clear (and I suspect the writer did not have it clear in his head either) exactly what is meant by "arithmetic". [In what follows I shall use the word Arithmetic to refer to common arithmetic, Peano arithmetic to refer to Peano arithmetic, and arithmetic to refer to Atkins' use of the word "arithmetic"].

Sometimes it seems like he means Arithmetic in the common sense, that is, the collection of statements about natural numbers that are true in the standard interpretation (a.k.a. number theory). But sometimes it seems like he means Peano arithmetic, which is a specific formal axiomatic system, a fragment of the former Arithmetic. These two things are not to be identified - there are number theoretical facts which are not a part of Peano arithmetic. This confusion doesn't really rear its head until the end of chapter 10, when Atkins concludes that the universe is made of arithmetic, so Godel's theorem applies to the universe, and the universe cannot prove itself consistent because arithmetic cannot prove itself consistent. If arithmetic here means Peano arithmetic, then it might make some sense. But there is no reason to think that all the mathematics that nature makes use of can be formalised in Peano arithmetic (this would exclude fairly elementary combinatorial statements, for one thing). If Atkins means by "arithmetic" the common Arithmetic, which I suspect he does, then what he wrote does not make sense. Godel's theorems do not apply to Arithmetic. In fact it is senseless to talk of the consistency of Arithmetic. One cannot define what Arithmetic is, so one cannot lay out a statement asserting the consistency of it.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 13 October 2004
Galileo's Finger - it's all thumbs. I don't disagree that these may be ten of the greatest ideas of science, it's just the way they're presented. Overly cumbersome and awkward style of writing leave you bored and re-reading the same page as you've drifted off. After a while you can't be bothered trying to understand exactly what it is the author is trying to explain. Given the amazing reviews on the cover of this book, I found it a huge disappointment. Science explained easily - I don't think so - as someone who has a scientific background, I could only wonder what someone who hadn't would make of this.
0Comment| 9 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 18 October 2015
No complaints about delivery & quality of book, great, but ......
the book covers most subjects in the Universe......
maybe easy for some.......not me !!!
Beam me up Scotty !!!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 17 October 2014
I love this book! So interesting and covers all of the main areas of science in an clear, concise and interesting way!
I recommend! Great Gift too! Good Value and Good delivery
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 17 August 2015
Interesting for engineering types
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 22 January 2007
Atkins may be a good chemist, but this book does a disservice to the world of science in general and physics in particular. It is poorly written, ponderous and pompous in its style, obtuse in its explanations of relatively straightforward concepts, and would possibly maim a young person attracted by its catchy title and promise of a broad understanding of important scientific ideas before embarking on a serious scientific career.

I wasted money and time on this book, but I do wish it could be withdrawn, or at least restricted to those who have lost the will to imagine.....
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)