Learn more Shop now Shop now</arg> Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now DIYED Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen with Prime Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

on 16 February 2013
Really good book, detailing the (often mythological) ancient history of Britain, with a large section on King Arthur and Merlin's prophecies; which are reason enough to purchase the book! Expect bloodshed, epic battles and pillaging...
0Comment| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 31 July 2008
This is the source of so many of the Arthur stories written later that it is an absolute Must Read for anyone interested in the topic. Fortunately for an old text, it's also easy reading as Monmouth has a good eye for a story (which is all history meant at the time).

As history, it's not at all reliable with the kind of distant relationship with anything that may have occured that the Iliad has to Mycenae. Do not treat as anything remotely resembling gospel as he's clearly made up chunks all over the place.

On the other hand, it is believed that he had access to welsh sources other than the Mabinogion, now lost and that alone would be reason to read him.
0Comment| 18 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
VINE VOICEon 13 November 2007
This needs reviewing on two levels. The easiest is the translation which is very clear on its sources from the various versions of Geoffrey which exist. It does not give too many footnotes in the text - I would have preferred more as I have little other background on the myth. As a first encounter with the text though this version is very accessible, within limits.

The actual tale as far as I can tell is written to condemn the Saxons (called Angles only once) and paint the real Britons as being of great stock, apparently descended from the Trojans and related to the Romans. The Britons have a long history full of strange names and detail - for example the source of King Lear! All very well until we hit Merlin and Uther Pendragon. There is the story of the conception of Arthur and a massive prophecy from Merlin who then mostly vanishes. The Arthur story has the sword Caliburn and Guinevere, noble knights and great battles. Unknown to me Arthur also conquers Iceland, France and Rome! In fact the book is riddled with attacks on Gaul or by Gaul, and Brittany is of course Amorica and really settled by the Britons. Arthur is betray by Mordred and vanishes of allowing the text to quickly pass through to the ultimate demise of the Britons (apart from a few scattered in the places now recognised as Celtic - Wales, Cornwall and so forth).

So the English are the baddies and thankfully the Normans sorted them out in 1066, but one day the Britons will rise with their King Arthur - what will we English do I wonder?

All in all an amusing read, and shows the power of politics and the seeds of the more modern legends.
22 Comments| 15 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 3 February 2014
This is history only in the loosest sense, as it is a compilation drawn from many sources. However, it gives a small window through which to see how our forebears perceived themselves and their world. It is also well-written, and so is worth reading if only for the tale it tells.
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 23 October 2015
Very interesting book, have read virtually all of it. Just seems a shame that the opinion of most who really know about such things don't know id it is to taken as a truthful record, of it Geoffrey has made it all up! Willl have to do some more research.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 31 October 2014
I honestly did like it, but with books of this genre is does tend to drag on a little bit, which a wealth of characters - many with the same name, easy to get bored of half way through, not a must read but do if you can. More of a book to study to gather back-up for aruguments.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 25 April 2002
For an twelfth century story-book writer, Monmouth does a very good job. His writing style is both entertaining and informative. He does tend to exaggerate quite a bit regarding accurate information, but the book makes a very good read, and there is a whole section devoted to the first fully developed legend of King Arthur.
0Comment| 15 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 15 September 2013
This is an odd book. As history it's no good, because it's mostly false. As a work of fiction it's often too brisk to be engaging. King after King is born, fights, looses, dies. The headline star is Arthur, of course. Whereas some kings have their lives summarised in a paragraph, Arthur has 49 pages, over a fifth of the book devoted to him.

The account of Arthur given here differs from the later, romantic tales in ways that are good and bad. One the plus side, the focus stays on Arthur and doesn't drift to the knights of his court. Best of all, this is a version without that dreadful prig Lancelot (the most irritating character in English literature). On the minus side, Arthur's story is reduced to little more than a series of battles, and Geoffrey's account of his death, or retirement to Avalon, is even more cursory than Malory's.

Some of the other Kings whose lives are recounted here, such as Lear, Vortigern, Aurelius Ambrosius and Cadwallo, are actually more interesting. Sometimes this is because of their characters, sometimes it's because of the events through which they live, sometimes it's because their stories appear to lie closer to true history than those of Merlin and Brutus, for example. This is the main attraction of this book: not the fact that it inspired later writers like Shakespeare, etc., but the teasing prospect that somewhere in here, beneath all the distortion and elaboration, lie nuggets of truth.
0Comment| 3 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 31 August 2008
In terms of reliability as a historical source Monmouth's History of the Kings of Britain ranges from just plausible to down right nonsensical but you can't take away the sheer brilliance of literary construct on the part of Geoffrey of Monmouth. The farther of Arthurian romance does not fail to entertain.

Only two criticisms which makes it a 4 instead of a 5 star read, Monmouth crams around 2000 years of history into about 250 pages, as such sometimes the book moves at such a pace he just lists kings without passing any comment on them making them instantly forgettable. The only chapter I didn't enjoy was the one on Merlin, I just find it too far out there, maybe it is because I'm a philistine but it just reads like the ramblings of a lunatic.
22 Comments| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 19 November 2016
bought for present for someone who has no history
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse