Learn more Download now Shop now Pre-order now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Amazon Music Unlimited for Family Shop now Shop now Learn more

on 12 March 2017
A revamp of a classic story. I've thoroughly enjoyed this story, true the story isn't grounded in any true realism like the fact the military seem to react to events like a bunch of amateurs ( why aren't they wearing protective gear? How come reporters are milling around government property? And whys a major talking to them before an official statement?) and if you think they're unprofessional wait to you see the medical amateurs, er I mean professionals. But all these criticisms are moot if you take the book for what it's meant to be, a representation of a B MOVIE!!!! Shaun Huston " the Godfather of Gore" captures this genres essence perfectly. If your looking for an enjoyable, hi octane horror story what's easy to pick up and read, without pretentiousness then this is a book for you!!
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 14 July 2012
Shaun Hutson has done a brilliant job of novelising the screenplay to this 50's Hammer classic. He previously novelised another Hammer movie, Twins Of Evil. With X-The Unknown he has updated the story by moving it from the 1950's to the present day, whilst at the same time keeping true to the theme and tone of the original piece. It reads like vintage Shaun Hutson horror fare and will delight both his literary fans and Hammer officiandos alike. It will also serve to introduce new people to an old, but certainly not forgotton, masterpiece
0Comment| 8 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 18 July 2012
I knew going in that this was going to be an updated version of one of my favorite movies. However, it was also by one of my favorite authors, so I was willing to give it a chance.

I liked it. He added some stuff in that may have not been necessary, but overall it was a solid read.
0Comment| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 5 November 2012
Great read. Vintage in its style. The army, nuclear scientists and some ancient horror out in the countryside. Feel of the Quatermass films and books. Good read.
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 30 March 2013
I received a review copy of this book from the publisher.

Like many of us, I'm a bit of a purist regarding adaptations of classic works, so the fact that Shaun Hutson chose(actually, this decision was the publisher's, not Hutson's)to bring this adaptation forward to the present day and relocate it a long way south of the events of the original 1956 film filled me with no little trepidation.

Having said that, I hadn't seen the movie for a very long time--probably sometime back in the late 60s--so I decided to watch it again first, so I could more easily see what changes had been made.
I'm pleased to report that the alterations actually work very well and, in hindsight, the book hangs together rather better than the original.

Freed from the constraints of the film board censorship, Hutson is able to be more realistic with the dialogue of the soldiers. He neatly adds material and characters which give more weight to the events of the film, without sacrificing anything. There are only two major changes, other than period and location. The first is in making the lead character somewhat younger than in the original, which I found perfectly logical. The second is right at the end, where he has Royston realise that his original plan for destroying the entity was simply not going to work and comes up with a better and more believable one.

I'd always thought the "monster" to be vaguely Lovecraftian in concept, and it's evident that Hutson agreed, as he ends the book on a quote from the master himself.

To some extent, I regretted my decision to view the original movie version first, as it rather took all the suspense out of reading what turned out to be a very enjoyable SF/horror novel.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 22 April 2015
The book is not involving at all. It's an OK tale, but I don't identify with any of the characters - they don't really come to life.

They keep wittering on about 'radiation', but that was established at the beginning of the book - why do they keep discovering it every five minutes.
The author claims to have brought the tale up to date, but I'm afraid the odd reference to Afghanistan and mobile phones just doesn't do it. It's written as an old tale.

A couple of examples:
- doctors haven't worn white coats for many years - it's all 'pyjamas'
- radiographers don't stay in the same room as patients when treating them

Basically, I feel the story is weak and the writing lazy.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 28 July 2013
Being a fan of Hammer films and Hutson I was intrigued by this marriage. Hutson updated the story while all the time keeping the overall feel of the original script. Both Hammer and Shaun have a style all of their own, but each was equally mantained which I found very impressive. All through the book I could feel the charm and feel of the film which was unique to Hammer.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 8 April 2015
Typical Hammer Horror story: Good build up, poor finale. The story has been updated well, and retains enough of the original movie plot to stay true. But the ending is a complete let down. It could have remained set in the 50s, nothing would have been lost. For a modern story, it just needs more explanation and maybe a bit more creature
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 3 August 2013
very poor for shaun hutson .it read like a hammer films script early sixties style.i think mr hutson must have watched the film of the same title then tried to modernise it a bit .very poor shaun i have been a fan for a long time so i was very dissapointed with this book/
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse
on 20 May 2013
The original story was set in the 1950's and was good for its time, but this version has been updated to the 2010's making it a good read. With this update it would be interesting to see if anyone would pick it up and re-make the movie
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you? Report abuse

Need customer service? Click here