UEFA Champions League
£23.99 with 4 percent savings
RRP: £24.99
£11.35 delivery Thursday, 12 December. Details
Or fastest delivery Sunday, 8 December. Order within 1 hr 20 mins. Details
In stock
££23.99 () Includes selected options. Includes initial monthly payment and selected options. Details
Price
Subtotal
££23.99
Subtotal
Initial payment breakdown
Delivery cost, delivery date and order total (including tax) shown at checkout.
Dispatches from
Amazon
Dispatches from
Amazon
Sold by
Amazon
Sold by
Amazon
Returns
Returnable until Jan 31, 2025
Returnable until Jan 31, 2025
For the 2024 holiday season, this item if purchased between November 1 and December 25, 2024 can be returned until January 31, 2025 or within 30 days from receipt (whichever is later).
Returns
Returnable until Jan 31, 2025
For the 2024 holiday season, this item if purchased between November 1 and December 25, 2024 can be returned until January 31, 2025 or within 30 days from receipt (whichever is later).
Payment
Secure transaction
Your transaction is secure
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Payment
Secure transaction
We work hard to protect your security and privacy. Our payment security system encrypts your information during transmission. We don’t share your credit card details with third-party sellers, and we don’t sell your information to others. Learn more
Added to

Sorry, there was a problem.

There was an error retrieving your Wish Lists. Please try again.

Sorry, there was a problem.

List unavailable.
Kindle app logo image

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.

Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.

Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.

QR code to download the Kindle App

Follow the authors

See all
Something went wrong. Please try your request again later.

Global Catastrophic Risks Paperback – Illustrated, 1 Aug. 2011

4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 66 ratings

Promotion Message Prime Student members get 10% off | 1 promotion
  • Prime Student members get 10% off Shop items | Terms
{"desktop_buybox_group_1":[{"displayPrice":"£23.99","priceAmount":23.99,"currencySymbol":"£","integerValue":"23","decimalSeparator":".","fractionalValue":"99","symbolPosition":"left","hasSpace":false,"showFractionalPartIfEmpty":true,"offerListingId":"jmsPHfCV2bMkWdto2%2BPzs9JvPUIKUZRdLpdPtNGsvA1WCZ1hZpOl7cTudn58EdbBKtCVVcI4zcgZXN3q0nkoGXxZVLjJnp8jHehAqdZm1Y9GHz31%2FNV2vzKfjOsse43k","locale":"en-GB","buyingOptionType":"NEW","aapiBuyingOptionIndex":0}]}

Purchase options and add-ons

A global catastrophic risk is one with the potential to wreak death and destruction on a global scale. In human history, wars and plagues have done so on more than one occasion, and misguided ideologies and totalitarian regimes have darkened an entire era or a region. Advances in technology are adding dangers of a new kind. It could happen again.

In
Global Catastrophic Risks 25 leading experts look at the gravest risks facing humanity in the 21st century, including asteroid impacts, gamma-ray bursts, Earth-based natural catastrophes, nuclear war, terrorism, global warming, biological weapons, totalitarianism, advanced nanotechnology, general artificial intelligence, and social collapse. The book also addresses over-arching issues - policy responses and methods for predicting and managing catastrophes.

This is invaluable reading for anyone interested in the big issues of our time; for students focusing on science, society, technology, and public policy; and for academics, policy-makers, and professionals working in these acutely important fields.

Frequently bought together

This item: Global Catastrophic Risks
£23.99
In stock
Sent from and sold by Amazon.
+
£9.45
In stock
Sent from and sold by Amazon.
Total price: $00
To see our price, add these items to your basket.
Details
Added to Basket
spCSRF_Treatment
Choose items to buy together.

Product description

Review

Review from previous edition This volume is remarkably entertaining and readable...It's risk assessment meets science fiction. ― Natural Hazards Observer

The book works well, providing a mine of peer-reviewed information on the great risks that threaten our own and future generations. ―
Nature

We should welcome this fascinating and provocative book. ―
Martin J Rees (from foreword)

[Provides] a mine of peer-reviewed information on the great risks that threaten our own and future generations. ―
Nature

Review

Review from previous edition This volume is remarkably entertaining and readable...It's risk assessment meets science fiction. ― Natural Hazards Observer

The book works well, providing a mine of peer-reviewed information on the great risks that threaten our own and future generations. ―
Nature

We should welcome this fascinating and provocative book. ―
Martin J Rees (from foreword)

[Provides] a mine of peer-reviewed information on the great risks that threaten our own and future generations. ―
Nature

Product details

  • Publisher ‏ : ‎ Oxford University Press, USA; Illustrated edition (1 Aug. 2011)
  • Language ‏ : ‎ English
  • Paperback ‏ : ‎ 560 pages
  • ISBN-10 ‏ : ‎ 0199606501
  • ISBN-13 ‏ : ‎ 978-0199606504
  • Dimensions ‏ : ‎ 3.3 x 15.49 x 23.37 cm
  • Customer reviews:
    4.4 4.4 out of 5 stars 66 ratings

About the authors

Follow authors to get new release updates, plus improved recommendations.

Customer reviews

4.4 out of 5 stars
66 global ratings

Top reviews from United Kingdom

Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 4 May 2015
This is a very interesting (if depressing) summary of the spectrum of different catastrophic risks facing humanity from the obscure and unlikely such as a vacuum phase transition to very real and well known risks such as nuclear terrorism and climate change. Each risk is discussed by a different author and some chapters are evidently better than others but as a whole, topics are addressed clearly and intelligently and are generally very accessible.

As another reviewer has commented on, "obscure and unlikely" risks receive as much, if not more, attention than the more well known risks but the book makes it very clear from the onset that it is not supposed to be a manual for saving the world. Instead, it is simply trying to inform readers about global catastrophic risks as a wider issue (the book includes several chapters on sociological aspects such as cognitive biases) rather than specifically trying to help people prepare for them. I think it does this very well.
4 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 13 May 2018
The book provides a great and intellectually rigorous overview of different large-scale risks that humanity faces and many interesting additional topics, such as a chapter on how cognitive biases affect people's judgment of global threats. Importantly, this book is written by academics and aimed at an audience who seeks to understand global catastrophic risks (GCRs) or existential risks (x-risks) at a deep and somewhat technical level. In essence, the book establishes the academic field of the study of low-probability, high-stakes risks to humanity and shows that this is an area which benefits from serious, rigorous and evidence-based academic research.
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 18 December 2014
Rather depressing! Tough going on the math but certainly provides food for thought. Not sure I agree on the Totalitarian sections.
One person found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 18 June 2017
Interesting book, still I feel it is somehow obsolete and has an agenda, a globalist agenda, so the texts do read a bit like a propaganda for a lot of the time. Still it is a good read, though there is a lot of information which is not new, some details were fundamental to me. Surprising enough, the text of Frank Wilczek is the first analyses of the Fermi paradox which states most correctly that advanced civilisations would most likely know how to disguise themselves, something so obvious and people do not get it.
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 5 January 2011
I've been concerned about the future of life on planet Earth since I was in my teens some 25 years ago. Not much has changed since then as we have not made much progress, save the ability to chat inanely to those lucky enough to have access to modern technology. So what did I expect from this book? A lot more than it gave, that's for sure!

As I was reading the child-like introduction by Martin J. Rees, who lashes out at those he sees as a threat in a similar way to a kid in the playground starts name calling when he's not getting his way, I knew it was going to be an uphill struggle. To quote one sentence: "And there are extreme eco-freaks who believe that the world would be better off if it were rid of humans." Convince me that we are beneficial to life on earth with well constructed arguments and I will try to see just how "better off" the world is with us lot subjugating nature to our own selfish ends. But it will take a lot to convince me!

The book doesn't claim to cover every conceivable threat to human existence on the planet, but the threats that are included are not necessarily the most realistic. Whole chapters are devoted to what can only be termed as science-fiction: that we are part of some simulation and the "Director" of said simulation could tire of watching us and switch the simulation off. Huh? Another chapter is devoted to artificial intelligence that will somehow begin a life of it's own. Come on, people, there are more realistic threats that we should be concerned with, such as disease (a mere 17 pages compared to 35 on artificial intelligence), weaponry (only nuclear and biological weapons are covered), natural events that come as a result of over-population (this is the single biggest threat to human life on earth as no-one is addressing the issue and we expect the earth to support an infinite number of humans - truly absurd!).

The chapter on cognitive bias was probably the most interesting chapter for me, which is about how difficult it is to be truly objective in trying to assess risks. This makes sense as it takes selfless introspection to truly transcend the bias of our human nature, i.e.: the instincts that drive us. The assumption that human beings are the most intelligent life-forms ever to inhabit the planet, that the planet would be worse-off if we were not here - these are emotionally-driven statements that come from the deepest instinct of all - that of survival. They are not intellectual arguments and have no place in a scientific body of work.

One thing that does strike me is how little we know of the past. There is a lot of guesswork, a lot of assumptions, a lot of "probables". This is not factual nor is it scientific, so why do so-called scientists put it forward as "fact"?

All-in-all, I was left quite numb after reading this book. Not because of any threats to the existence of "human" life on earth, but the arrogance that shines through from all these "intellectuals". As far as they are concerned, human beings are the only things that matter and everything else on the planet, in the universe, is there for the taking. It is this attitude towards life that will lead to our extinction and for the sake of the rest of life on this wonderful and unique planet, the sooner the better! Even if we became extinct next week, we would leave behind a terrible legacy, one that we should be ashamed of (assuming that any of us have a sense of humility, that is).
12 people found this helpful
Report
Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 25 March 2010
I got this last year in view of the CME discussion. Unfortunately, many scenarios are not covered in this book, but those who are are very well described with lots of source references. A typical Oxford Press, a little too heady for my taste. No fringe issue even mentioned, much less touched on in any length.

Four stars for a not very exiting but industrious work.
4 people found this helpful
Report

Top reviews from other countries

Translate all reviews to English
carlos sidnei coutinho
5.0 out of 5 stars Imperial Superpower Myth: End of Pax Americana
Reviewed in Brazil on 23 August 2019
Atendeu minhas expectativas.
David J. Aldous
5.0 out of 5 stars Eclectic and thought-provoking academic essays
Reviewed in the United States on 7 November 2008
21 chapters by different authors succeed in the declared goal of giving a big picture of the subject (GCR) as seen by academics in different disciplines. The content is appropriately non-technical -- like the serious end of the ``popular science" genre -- though the writing styles are more reminiscent of an academic paper or lecture than the style of best-selling popular science books. The opening 8 ``background" chapters (on very diverse topics from long-term astrophysics to public policy toward catastrophe) were the least satisfying to me, many (while interesting in themselves) seeming to be each author's favorite lecture recycled with a nod to GCR. Of these chapters, let me just single out Eliezer Yudkowsky's chapter on cognitive biases in an individual's risk assessments, as one of the best 20-page summaries of that topic I have read.

Amongst the core chapters discussing particular risks, the three that are most ``hard science", on supervolcanos, asteroid or comet impact, and extra-solar-system risks are just great -- one learns for instance that (contrary to much science fiction) comets are more a risk than asteroids, and the major risk in the last category is not nearby supernovas but cosmic rays created by gamma ray bursts. These three chapters are perhaps the only contexts where it's reasonable to attempt to estimate actual probabilities of the catastrophes.

The balanced article on global warming is unlikely to please extremists, concluding that mainstream science predicts a linear increase in temperature that may be unpleasant but not catastrophic, while the various speculative non-linear possibilities leading to catastrophe have plausibilities impossible to assess. The article on pandemics is surprisingly upbeat (``are influenza pandemics likely? Possibly, except for the preposterous mortality rate that has been proposed"), as is the article on exotic physics ("Might our vacuum be only metastable? If so, we can envisage a terminal catastrophe, when the field configuration of empty space changes, and with it the effective laws of physics ..."). The articles on nuclear war, on nuclear terrorism, and on risks from biotechnology and from nanotechnology are perfectly sensible and well-argued. These articles are somewhat technical, so it is a curious relief to arrive at "totalitarian government" which discusses in an easy to read way why 20th century totalitarian governments did not last forever, and circumstances under which a stable worldwide totalitarian government might emerge.

The article on AIs emphasizes that we wrongly imagine intelligent machines as like humans -- "how likely is it that AI will cross the vast gap from amoeba to village idiot, and then stop at the level of human genius?" -- and that we should attempt to envisage something quite different. But the subsequent discussion of Friendly or Unfriendly AIs rests on the assumptions that AIs may be created which have intelligence and motivation ("optimization targets", in the author's effort to avoid anthropomorphizing) to do things on their own initiative, and that their motivations will be comprehensible to humans. Well, I find it hard enough to imagine what "motivation/optimization targets" mean to an amoeba or a village idiot, let alone an AI.

The only article I found positively unsatisfactory was on social collapse. A catastrophe eliminating global food production for one year would likely cause "collapse of civilization" in fighting over the 2 months food supply in storage. But not elimination for just one month. A serious discussion of the sizes of different catastrophes needed to reach this tipping point would be fascinating, but the article merely assumes power law distributions for the size of an unspecified disaster -- this is the sort of thing that brings mathematical modeling into disrepute.

Overall, a valuable and eclectic selection of thought-provoking articles.
Oparazzo
3.0 out of 5 stars Apokalypsen à la carte
Reviewed in Germany on 8 April 2017
Ein vielleicht etwas morbides Interesse an der Frage, ob und wenn ja, wann und wie unsere Zivilisation ein jähes Ende finden könnte, hat mich auf diese Aufsatzsammlung gebracht. Sie basiert auf einer Konferenz, die 2008 am Future of Humanity Institute in Oxford abgehalten wurde.

Man merkt dem Buch an, dass dies eine Veranstaltung von Wissenschaftlern für Wissenschaftler war - die von mir sonst so gerne gelobte Fähigkeit und Bereitschaft anglophoner Autoren, sich für den interessierten Laien verständlich auszudrücken, ist hier sehr unterschiedlich ausgeprägt, und das ist angesichts der Vielfalt der vertretenen Fakultäten etwas schade. Naturwissenschaftliche Vorbildung sowie eine gewisse Bereitschaft, sich mit Zahlen auseinanderzusetzen, sind jedenfalls bei den meisten Themen von Nutzen.

Auch wenn ein paar Randgebiete reingerutscht sind - milleniaristische Kulte haben mit echten Katastrophen wenig zu tun, und den Artikel über Für und Wider alleskönnender Nanofabrikchen fand ich etwas sehr verspielt-hypothetisch - haben andere dafür umso mehr Substanz, wie die über Asteroiden, Kometen oder Supervulkane. Sehr eindrucksvoll auch das Kapitel über künstliche Intelligenz und die Gedanken, die man sich tunlichst gemacht haben sollte, bevor diese sich dem Einfluss ihrer Macher entzieht. Beim Kapitel über den Klimawandel war ich mir nicht sicher, ob hier nicht zu viel hinterfragt, zu wenig gewarnt und damit den interessengesteuerten Leugnern zu viel Munition an die Hand gegeben wurde.

Das könnte aber auch damit zusammenhängen, dass das Buch inzwischen fast zehn Jahre alt ist. Das merkt man nicht nur daran, das Osama bin Laden noch lebt und es den IS noch nicht gibt, sondern es wird auch eine so unmittelbar drohende Gefahr wie die multiresistenter Keime nur in einem Absatz gestreift. Dass ein Sonnensturm wie der von 1859, der unser Kommunikationsnetz weltweit und langfristig lahmlegen würde, nicht als Risiko eingeschätzt wird, hat mich ebenfalls sehr gewundert (2012 hätte es uns fast wieder erwischt). Und schließlich dürften auch die Eintrittswahrscheinlichkeit einer nuklearen Katastrophe heute etwas anders eingeschätzt werden, angesichts der Tatsache, dass ein inkompetenter Narzisst und ein undurchsichtiger Diktator die Finger an den jeweiligen Roten Knöpfen haben.

Das sind, zugegebenermaßen, alles nur persönliche, den Blick möglicherweise verstellende Sichtweisen - vor dem cognitive bias wird in dem Buch nicht nur einmal ausdrücklich gewarnt.
Mike Byrne
5.0 out of 5 stars I'll Read this Book Again
Reviewed in the United States on 13 January 2009
GCR (Global Catastrophic Risks) is a real page-turner. I literally couldn't put it down. Sometimes I'd wake up in the middle of the night with the book open on my chest, and the lights on, and I'd begin reading again from where I'd dozed off hours earlier, and I'd keep reading till I just had to go to sleep.

I had read a review of GCR in the scientific journal "Nature" in which the reviewer complained that the authors had given the global warming issue short shrift. I considered this a plus.

If, like me, you get very annoyed by "typos," be forewarned. There are enough typos in GCR to start a collection. At first I was a bit annoyed by them, but some were quite amusing... almost as if they were done on purpose.

Most of the typos were straight typing errors, or errors of fact. For example, on page 292 the author says that the 1918 flu pandemic killed "only 23%" of those infected. Only 23%? That seems a rather high percentage to be preceeded by the qualifier "only". Of course, although 50 million people died in the pandemic, this represented "only" 2% to 3% of those infected... not 23%. On p 295 we read "the rats and their s in ships" and it might take us a moment to determine that it should have read, "the rats and their fleas in ships."

But many of the typos were either fun, or a bit more tricky to figure out: on p. 254 we find "canal so" which you can probably predict should have been "can also." Much trickier, on p. 255 we find, "A large meteoric impact was invoked (...) in order to explain their idium anomaly." Their idium anomaly?? Nah. Better would have been..."the iridium anomaly!" (That's one of my favorites.) Elsewhere, we find twice on the same page "an arrow" instead of "a narrow"... and so it goes..."mortality greater than $1 million." on p. 168 (why the $ sign?) etc. etc.

But the overall impact of the book is tremendous. We learn all sorts of arcane and troubling data, e.g. form p.301 "A totally unforseen complication of the successful restoration of immunologic function by the treatment of AIDS with antiviral drugs has been the activation of dormant leprosy..." I can hear the phone call now...."Darling, I have some wonderful news, and some terrible news...hold on a second dearest, my nose just fell off..."

So even if you're usually turned off by typos, don't let that stop you from buying this book. I expected more from the Oxford University Press, but I guess they've sacked the proofreader and they're using Spell-Check these days. But then, how did "their idium anomaly" get past Spell-Check? I guess Spell-Check at Oxford includes Latin.
Tretiak
5.0 out of 5 stars A work of tremendous importance.
Reviewed in the United States on 28 July 2012
This book is a compendium of what are referred to as GCRs (Global Catastrophic Risks) that represent future risks and cases, and merit much consideration if the human species is to survive into the future. Some of the cases given can seem "out there" so to speak in that they can seem like very futuristic and remote possibilities, but nonetheless are still very pertinent for the continuity of humanity. Social collapse, astrophysical catastrophes, technological breakthroughs, apocalyptic ideas given social consideration and credibility, thermonuclear war, and biases in human reasoning are all among the broad categories discussed within the books content. Some areas could have been expanded upon more, and other areas have an intermix of technical jargon here and there. This book would due very well to people looking to supplement their efforts for things like social work and for people in scientific disciplines, and to get a sense of general awareness and exposure from experts in the field as to how relevant these issues already are, or are going to become in the future.

Probably the most dangerous future risk is going to be the advent of real Artificial Intelligence within our lifetime or very near into the future. Eliezer Yudkowsky is the top figurehead and spokesman for factors involved in this risk and is the editor for this specific risk within the book. If our fears are to become a reality, then it doesn't matter much of whatever else we get right. Many of the other risks to worry about, we already have a wealth of information on their occurrences, how they work, how likely they are to affect us, and how they will affect us when they come. The risks concerning the arrival of AI however are far more dangerous in that this isn't an experiment that we get to practically represent so that reality can beat us over the head with the correct answer. If we are to achieve true FAI (Friendly Artificial Intelligence as Yudkowsky calls it) then a massive amount of dedication, money and effort is needed for research needed to avoid a real disaster. If our aims are achieved and realized however, many of the other risks and concerns we have can be offset to the handling of an intelligence much greater than ourselves with a higher probability and likelihood of being overcome.

We are passing through a stage where we are beginning to create problems that are beyond our current capacity to provide solutions for. This book is probably the best general and somewhat technical primer to become acquainted with serious problems we are currently facing and that we will inevitably arrive at in the future. If you are truly keen to getting involved in with the kinds of problems we will have to confront, this book is indispensable.