Shop now Shop now Shop now Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop Kindle Shop now Shop now

Customer Reviews

4.2 out of 5 stars
4.2 out of 5 stars
5 star
4 star
3 star
2 star
1 star
Format: MP3 Download|Change
Your rating(Clear)Rate this item

There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.

There is no applause to mar the end of this transporting performance of Bruckner Five; one must assume the final bars are from a studio take, or that the audience were uniformly transfigured. I expect you will be too.

Haitink, despite being eminent and high profile, has never been about glamour (neither has Bruckner) and anyone taken in by Abbado's frankly overrated and cock-eyed performances last year really needs to hear this concert from the world's foremost Bruckner conductor. This is his third Fifth, the others (Amsterdam, Vienna) generally nla. The second movement has gotten quicker over the years, which might disappoint some, but what fascinates here is the new perception that it is the the long outer movements that are in fact the slow ones, the middle movements the ones that dance and leap. Kind of like Mahler's Ninth, there is a reversal of expectation, but Bruckner's more cunning for being in a sense also mislabelled. Remember Robert Simpson's comments about the adagio mood of No.4? The scherzo, oft in danger of becoming a pounding bore, has always been a Haitink specialty and here, as in the earlier movements, I was gratified by the balance and transparency of the playing and the BR recording from Philharmonie. It should be said that there are remarkably eloquent solo and sectional contributions throughout (e.g. the principal oboe) but ample weight and power in the tuttis.

What is perceptible above Haitink's previous recordings is the sense of organic rather than architectural growth in the symphony's conception in performance as a whole. More majestic oak rather than cathedral stonework. This is uniquely satisfying in the finale which has a wondrous inevitability in its unforced but by no means stately progression towards a summarising chorale that I swear has never sounded so beautiful as it does here. Haitink's sovereign and staggeringly disciplined control of the music put me in mind of Sibelius and a glorious concert in Berlin conducted by Rattle. (It's a shame the Dutchman has never recorded any of the Finnish master's music.) Whereas a more theatrical arrival at the peroration is affected by Jochum, slowing down dramatically for those majestic brass incursions, Haitink and the BRSO simply glide straight into it, exquisite contributions from the strings not swamped by the brass and timps. The effect is one of the purest radiance and left me gasping for breath. Even if you already have his similar VPO recording you really need to hear this one for this crowning touch. Only the very last bars are a tad undercharacterised.

To sum up, this is a uniquely persuasive and most beautiful interpretation which complements the more high voltage Concertgebouw recording and deserves to take its place alongside Jochum (Tahra) Furtwangler (Testament) and Celibidache (DG) in the Bruckner pantheon.
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 10 August 2012
Although Haitink is undoubtedly one of todays most distinguished conductors with long experience in conducting Bruckner with the worlds finest orchestras, for me there is ultimately a sense of his performances, from Beethoven and Bruckner to Mahler and Shostakovich, never quite realizing a true greatness. I know this term is over used, and in a certain sense inaccurate, perhaps a better term would be overall integrity and interpretive honesty, but for now 'greatest' seems fitting, and it certainly registers a recognised semantic charge. To put it rather crudely Haitink 'should' be a 'great' conductor. He certainly has intergrity, and a kind of subjective modesty in concert, with a clear, economic conducting technique in the gestural sense, never any hint of audience pleasing histrionics, sensationalism,or conductorial narcissism. So what is lacking? For me Haitink's predilection for a certain restraint, which can add to a performance of say a Mahler symphony, which unfortuanately often attract conductorial distortion and indulgence. Toscanini often demanded more 'fire', more drama either in rehearsal or in actual performance. And I find this 'fire', dramatic commitment, to be largely lacking in Haitink's conducting.Perhaps too much restraint, too much toning down of a climax say, can be as debilitating as too much interventional excess; distorted dynamics etc. Especially in Bruckner.

This latest Haitink Bruckner five with the superb Bavarian Radio orchestra, very much encapsulates Haitinks strengths and weaknesses. After an ethereal opening adagio the build up to the main allegro is excellently timed, but it needes to be more sharply contoured with more accented brass and timpani. I wasn't overwhelmed in the way I am overwhemled by Gunter Wand, or Hans Rosbaud here. The second subject string melody over pizzicato chords was quite well paced, although there was a slight tendency to to let the pizzicato rhythmic figure sag. The development section here is one of Bruckner's most adavanced, complex and extended. After some contrasting variations based on the opening chorale motive the development takes on the form expansive harmonic blocks which encompass tonalities as remote as D minor, C sharp minor and A major. This magisterial sequence was all well played and paced but I just didn't hear the dramatic transpositions and contrasts, heard with the above mentioned conductors, and more recently in Harnoncourt's superb performance with the Vienna Philharmonic. Likewise the coda to the first movement failed to register any sense of intense expectaion, with rather sluggish rhythms.

The D minor second movement Adagio is undoubtedly the most successful feature of this performance. Haitink realises well that although the tempo marking is Adagio - Sehr langsam ( very slow)the underlying 4 in a bar pulse, initially stated on oboe in juxtaposition with the opening pizzicato triplets - a kind of dual pulse - indicating a noble breadth, but also movement; Bruckner's oft mentioned 'Bewegt'.
The penultimate sequence of this variation movement, before the closing chorale climax led by brass, with elaborately harmonised leaps of a seventh from the opening theme was particularly well contoured and paced by Haitink. The chains of rich counterpoint and dissonance, suggesting the sound of an organ' were most perceptively realized. The descending figure in violins and violas, a quotation from the 'Lacrimosa' from Mozart's Requiem, were beautifully incorporated with a sublime clarity and poignancy.

The D minor Scherzo, with its thematic links to the Adagio, starts in the style of a landler. But as it develops with a kind of double theme juxtaposing the landler rhythm we are cast into darker regions with sharp brass counterpoint, cross-rhythms and shifts in a contrasting tonal range from major to minor. Indeed the movement has about it something of the Walpurgis-Nacht, somthing unsettling, as though Mephistopheles is never far away. Here, and despite predictably good playing, Haitink simply sounds too ponderous, too lumpy. To hear how these staggering, menacing cross - rhythms can sound (ought to sound) listen to the recent recording with Herbert Blomstedt and the equally impressive Leipzig Gewandhaus Orchestra. With Blomstsdt we hear wonderfully incisive and diverse rythmic articulation. With Haitink we hear rather heavy and ponderous rhythmic articulation. There is a mono recording (live) of Haitink's predecessor at the Concertgebouw,Eduard van Beinum, what a difference! With van Beinum and Blomstsdt, in their different ways, we are plunged into the kaleidoscopic vortex of this incredible music. With Haitink we lose track,attention, as though it was rehearsal run-through!

Haitink has a reputation for holding a symphonic structure together. After being disappointed by the Scherzo I was at least expecting a reading of the monumental finale which was structurally coherent, in the way we always axpected and got from a great Bruckner conductor like Dr Klemperer. But, alas, this performance failed to deliver this essential structural, tonal coherence. It all started quite well with the quotes from the previous movements, a reference from Beethoven's model in his Ninth Symphony. But by the time we reach the great fugal sequences - a complex four part fugue - followed by a massive tutti double-fugue traversing tonal variations in F major and G flat and leading to the initiation of the themes which form the huge peroration of the coda, there was a general lack of structual coherence. The symphonic narrative failing to hold together. The fugal sequences are interpolated by a lyrical complex of themes, but increasingly by energetic leaps of an octave, a fifth and a fourth ( the basic intervals favoured by Bruckner )These sequences provide the thrust which subtends the movement, rigorously interrlated with the fugal episodes. But here Haitink seemed unable to register any sense of thrust,of pressing forward. It all sounded rather static and ponderous. Also, from the initiation of the fugal sequences, I wanted to hear a more clear and focused deliniation of the various contrupuntal strands. At times this performance sounded more like a great wash of sound. The great final, when it did come 'the crowning glory of the symphony'- lacked any sense of expectation, no sense of evolving from a vast symphonic narrative, of being unleashed. In itself it was compellingly played, but it lacked that essential tone of long symphonic progression to a staggering coda. This was exacerbated by a kind of toning down of the very last chords as though an element of embarrassment had crept into Haitink's interpretational psyche. This of all symphonic codas!

Those looking for a more didstinctive version of this fascinating symphony with the Bavarian Radio Symphony Orchestra would do well to invest in the recent Maazel 'live' recording, like the CD under review also on the orchestra's own label. Maazel's Bruckner 5 is not without its problems. But it is a performance with far more conviction, symphonic unity and thrust. The only problem here is that it is only available as part of complete set of the Bruckner symphonies. But if this is a put off look no further than the Blomstsedt or Harnoncourt, both mentioned above, and both from 'live' concerts.

This latest 'live' Bruckner 5
22 comments| 5 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 11 December 2014
I regard Bruckner's Fifth as his greatest utterance. It's less music and more cosmology. If the first chapter of the Book of Genesis had gone missing, it could serve as a substitute.

Dedicated and sober, Bernard Haitink is a known quantity. Rarely one to summon fire from heaven, he delivers rock-solid performances with all the fluency of Fedex. That the Bruckner Fifth is charged with the majesty of God - or the concept thereof - is beyond him. There's not an ion of visceral excitement in this superbly played, patient and well recorded performance. Like so many others - even the legendary Furtwangler - he falls for the sucker-punch in the "slow movement"; much to the satisfaction of Usain Bolt, the sprint finishes in 16'07". Come the finale's coda, the Chorus of Giants is respectful and devoid of transcendence.

Ever so ominously, Barenboim's second cycle with the Berliners could be likened to a string of mass-produced sausages (say, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8) but the Fifth was exceptional (even if the slow movement is another misfire) Bruckner: Symphony No. 5. There, the Chorus of Giants sounds like a who's who of Scripture where the One enthroned makes all things new. Much the same could be said of Karajan '76 and Jochum '85.

So why tarry with this?
0Comment| One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 13 December 2010
Slightly less than overwhelming ending (my favourite is Harnoncourt and the VPO, however the slow movement is just odd in that recording) so just sit back and wallow in the fantastic playing of the BRSO and a demonstration recording.
0Comment| 4 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 16 February 2013
This is really a very special experience. You are in the middle of a great performance of this symfonie. When you love classic music and you have a super audio player BUY IT.
0Comment|Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse
on 8 September 2011
The quality of the sound is very good and it was also rated 5 stars in BBC Music Magazine. Good value purchase
0Comment| 2 people found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you?YesNoReport abuse

Send us feedback

How can we make Amazon Customer Reviews better for you?
Let us know here.

Sponsored Links

  (What is this?)