Shop now Shop now Shop now Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Learn more Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Listen with Prime Pre-order now Shop Men's Shop Women's
Profile for Richard Parker > Reviews

Personal Profile

Content by Richard Parker
Top Reviewer Ranking: 6,932,126
Helpful Votes: 3

Learn more about Your Profile.

Reviews Written by
Richard Parker

Page: 1
VW Bus Buyers Guide - The Essential Buyer's Guide (Essential Buyer's Guide Series)
VW Bus Buyers Guide - The Essential Buyer's Guide (Essential Buyer's Guide Series)
by Richard Copping
Edition: Paperback
Price: £9.99

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful
4.0 out of 5 stars Essential tips, 1 May 2013
Verified Purchase(What is this?)
On first receipt, the book seems light and small (about A5 size and about half cm thick). However, it does a good job of highlighting the essential things to look out for with good photos of rust and other potential problems. It provides the right balance to give you enough info to keep in your head when you go to look at a VW. Too much info would just be 'too much'. It recommends you take it and refer to it during a once over. However, many of us would feel that highlights us as a 'novice' in front of a vendor. Alternatively, ideal to review just before a viewing and again after before making a final decision.

THE DENIAL OF SCIENCE: Analysing climate change scepticism in the UK
THE DENIAL OF SCIENCE: Analysing climate change scepticism in the UK
by Martin Lack
Edition: Paperback
Price: £11.95

2 of 3 people found the following review helpful
1.0 out of 5 stars The Accidental Satirist, 30 April 2013
The book starts with a nice quote from Fred Hoyle on the Earth's vulnerability. This is highly ironic given that Hoyle famously disagreed with two significant 20th C consensuses: Big Bang Theory and that he believed Life formed in outer space rather than on Earth. The premise and conclusions of Lack are that those who disagree with a `consensus' are driven by "an ideologically-motivated rejection of science, maintained by the rejection of the vast majority of research-based and observable evidence and/or the invocation of a scientific conspiracy".

After a promising start claiming to cover academic research (from his own Masters thesis) on what motivates AGW sceptics, the academic credentials are devalued by several references to amateur encyclopedia Wikipedia, plus some to online DeSmog Blog, whose stated `manifesto' is "Slamming the Climate Skeptic Scam". So while sceptics are decried for conspiracy theories, it seems ok to claim their own claims are a conspiracy. And while promising to avoid the "pejorative" term `denier', this doesn't prevent regular use of "deny" and "denial" throughout (even in the title).

The `research'? Lack selects known AGW-sceptics from a number of categories: scientists, journalists, politicians, etc; then gives quotes from them, alongside opinions from pro-AGW writers and himself to `demonstrate' these people hold morally unsound sceptic views. What do we learn? There is no effort to honestly understand their motivation, or even to provide evidence that they are driven by denial, conspiracy, or anti-environmentalist mindset. The conclusions are based on the very simplistic assumption that they must be wrong and dishonest because they don't agree with the `consensus' (just like the quoted Fred Hoyle?).

12 politicians are noted for being 'right wing' non-scientists, although working MP Graham Stringer MP (Labour) is bizarrely listed under `scientists' - on the basis he was previously a chemist. One scientist is criticised for saying "water vapour is a far more significant GHG than is CO2" (perhaps Lack should have looked a bit more at the science).

To an AGW-believer, this book gives you the `right' answer (which may explain endorsements by Michael Mann and Colin Summerhayes). For AGW-sceptics, the outcome is `well, is that it?'. Lack states: "care has been taken to be objective so as to avoid any potential accusation of confirmation bias (ie. setting out to find evidence for a theoretical position already held)". I was tempted to give 4 stars for this piece of perfect satire. But, of course, the satire was by accident rather than intention.

Page: 1