Shop now Shop now Shop now See more Shop all Amazon Fashion Cloud Drive Photos Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Shop Fire Shop now
Profile for Mr. Toby Joyce > Reviews

Personal Profile

Content by Mr. Toby Joyce
Top Reviewer Ranking: 9,177,271
Helpful Votes: 35

Learn more about Your Profile.

Reviews Written by
Mr. Toby Joyce "toby" (Blanchardstown, Dublin Ireland)
(REAL NAME)   

Show:  
Page: 1
pixel
Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism (Bradford Book) (Bradford Books)
Tower of Babel: The Evidence Against the New Creationism (Bradford Book) (Bradford Books)
by Robert Pennock
Edition: Hardcover

7 of 8 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Game, set and match to Pennock, 7 Nov. 2003
The author has written a full defence of evolution in science and education - emphasizing its centrality to biological research, and also its appearance in linguistics and some moral theory. His defence is more of an assault on the "Intelligent Design" Creationists, especially Philip Johnson, and his brilliant exposure of Johnson is the centrepiece of the book.
Being an American, Pennock does not explore why Creationism is so particularly American. Except for fundamentalist sects, it carries little or no weight outside the US, where even powerful politicians like Bush and Reagan have made fools of themselves with the "only a theory" escape clause. Another puzzle is why Catholicism has no truck with Creationism whatsoever. It is a pity that this is not explored some more. Clearly, it is related to the position of the Bible, which is less central to Catholic dogma as opposed to the authority of the Pope.
Another reason (which is more interesting) is the position of the Catholic religious orders in relation to science and education. Orders like the Jesuits and the Dominicians have always played a significant role in education (sometimes malignant!). Gregor Mendel, after all, was a Catholic monk. It would be interesting to see a more in-depth investigation of evolution in Catholic educational institutions like Notre Dame University. Catholicism is after all the largest single Christian church in the USA.
Besides that facet, this is an excellent book, and very good to learn about evolution, even if you don't have to defend your local school from rampant Creationists.


Wittgenstein's Poker
Wittgenstein's Poker
by David Edmonds
Edition: Hardcover

28 of 29 people found the following review helpful
5.0 out of 5 stars Clash of Titans, 3 Oct. 2001
This review is from: Wittgenstein's Poker (Hardcover)
Compare it to the famous debate on evolution at the British Association meeting in Oxford in 1860 between Darwinists and their opponents like the palaeontologist Robert Owen and Bishop 'Soapy Sam' Wilberforce. There, T.H.Huxley ('Darwin's Bulldog') baldly stated that he would rather be descended from an ape than from a Bishop who made specious and rediculous arguments. This literally brought the house down, and established Huxley as the hero who had vanquished the foe and established the hegemony of Darwinism, agnosticism and science over intellectual life. Except that more recent investigation has found the truth to be a little different. Huxley's speech, besides the 'ape/ Bishop' riposte, was not particularly convincing, and at least one Darwinist was heard to say afterwards 'The Bishop got the best of it'. The really forceful speaker who established the Evolution argument at Oxford was Darwin's friend, the botanist Thomas Hooker.
What does this tell us about the subject of this book? That myth is established in memory of what we wish had happened. Because of Huxley's smart retort, then he had to be the hero, and Hooker was forgotten. According to Edmonds and Eidenow, Popper in his memoirs cast himself in the Huxley role, witty riposte and all. But for the memory of one man (Peter Geach, who wrote to the TLS on the matter), we might still live with this particular myth.
The intellectual road to Room H3 is well explored in this book, managing to take in the key philosophical threads of the early part of the century - mainly the shift from epistemology to logic, and the focus on language established by Wittgenstein. Both men are well portrayed as forceful, agressive and (it has to be said) unpleasant debaters. To me, a long-time admirer of Popper, he does comes across with the more attractive human side - he had many close friends who loved him dearly. Wittgenstein seemed to only have disciples, and one feels that the wild exterior somehow went all the way to the core of the man. What you saw was what you got.
One can see that one of the things Popper reacted to was Wittgenstein's prophetic aura and oracular utterances - Popper despised intellectual 'authorities' (except perhaps himself) and deliberately tried to 'down' his opponent. One remark which was not quoted was Rudolf Carnap: "I have learned that the distance funtion is not symmetrical. The distance from me to Popper is much less than the distance from Popper to me.'
The authors have produced a tour-de-force which I highly recommend to anyone who is even vaguely interested in philosophy or the history of ideas. My one quibble is: was this as critical to the state of philosophy as the authors make out? Certainly it was not as critical to history or science generally as the BA 1860 debate. Popper may have thought so, but the authors show that the explosive meeting had little effect on the reputations of either man.
Those who enjoyed this book may like 'The Cambridge Quintet' by John L. Casti, a fictitous recreation of a dinner attended by Wittgenstein, Erwin Schrodinger and Alan Turing in which they explore their major ideas on philosophy and science.
Comment Comments (2) | Permalink | Most recent comment: Jun 5, 2010 12:54 AM BST


Page: 1