After encountering yet more silly reviews that feature the term "dated," a term that is among the most annoying of ones used, it seemed a good time to comment on that.
If one buys a dvd made in, say, 1974, then you should expect it to look like 1974, unless it is set in another time. To say it is "so terribly dated" is just silly. If I buy a dvd from a certain year, I want it to look like it, for if I bought a seventies one and it looked like 2011, I'd be extremely disappointed.
Another theme some misguided reviewers use, is to assume that because older stories take more consideration and have more style and sophisticated dialogue and characters behave with some decorum, that it is dull, or that the acting is poor or "wooden". I don't think I'm alone in thinking that acting from decades ago is often superior to what one finds, for the most part, today.
I will happily gather my "dated" dvds around me and continue to watch good quality stories and fine acting, and ignore the rubbish!
Who else feels the same?
Recent discussions in the television discussion forum (649 discussions)
|Help, please, re. TV play circa '78...||0||16 days ago|
|"INHERITANCE" by Phyllis Bentley||27||17 days ago|
|Roads to Freedom (BBC, 1970)||277||15 Jul 2017|
|Captain star on dvd||3||10 Jul 2017|
|Benny Hill considered funnier than Monty Python----BBC should put this fact into Hill documentary||452||3 Jul 2017|
|Tv theme tunes||89||1 Jul 2017|
|Scrap the T.V. licence. Yes or no||378||29 Jun 2017|
|What are the best British Legal series?||27||29 Jun 2017|
|TV Shows That You Wish Hadn't Been Axed Or Canceled||860||26 Jun 2017|
|Amazon video in Ireland||0||1 Apr 2017|
|Tv shows that are not on dvd , but should be .||2604||30 Mar 2017|
|Lancer Western TV Series||30||27 Mar 2017|