"We talk about perfection here.
No, you just keep insisting your god is this things and repeating them as if they reference anything.
"You rarely if at all see them in day to day life. Just flashings from time to time, which those with a heart for God spot and appreciate and those with stone hearts do not."
Nonsense. Believing in god or not makes little to no difference in your ability to reason morally.
"Evidence from human nature, state of the world, general natural world... they are all crying for the perfect explanatory, meaningful and resolving solution. Anything without God is ultimately poorly explained, meaningless and problematic with respect of harmony. And these are human terms."
You're terrible at reasoning and argument. The lack of perfection in the world doesn't mean you can assume them.
"Christianity is too common a designation. I would prefer Biblical (culturally explained) Christianity."
I have no idea what distinction you think you are making.
"Well many people choose "Hell", so its free after all."
No one chooses Hell it's the option Christian's leaves them if they don't prostrate themselves at the Christian's feet. It's dishonest to pretend this is a choice, it's a game you rigged.
"I would not hesitate to include any suggested phenomenon, showing the explanatory and well fitting any genuine seeker of truth power of the God-centred understanding."
Again, what are you saying here? You keep using words your arguments don't justify you using yet. All these things remain to be demonstrated.
"What have I not included?"
For starters, definitions for what you mean and intend to provide evidence for.