Learn more Shop now Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Learn More Shop now Fitbit
Customer Discussions > religion discussion forum

Announcement

Important Announcement from Amazon


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 101-125 of 167 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 13:22:59 GMT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 13:32:36 GMT
Spin's self-appraised 'superior opinion' doesn't seem to be recognised by readers on these public forums. He isn't getting the message loud and clear - Spin; your comments are useless and irrelevant. Your being here is included in 'anyone on a public discussion site', therefore, maybe you have nothing to do with yourself. Your constant waffle indicates that your brain is totally disengaged.

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 13:46:00 GMT
She certainly knows what to do with public money gained through the civil list! She can afford good advisors - she probably has the best.

Queen Elizabeth II, head of state of the United Kingdom and of 31 other states and territories, is the legal owner of about 6,600 million acres of land, one sixth of the earth's non ocean surface.

She is the only person on earth who owns whole countries, and who owns countries that are not her own domestic territory. This land ownership is separate from her role as head of state and is different from other monarchies where no such claim is made - Norway, Belgium, Denmark etc.

The value of her land holding is £17,600,000,000,000 (approx).

This makes her the richest individual on earth. However, there is no way easily to value her real estate. There is no current market in the land of entire countries. At a rough estimate of $5,000 an acre, and based on the sale of Alaska to the USA by the Tsar, and of Louisiana to the USA by France, the Queen's land holding is worth a notional $33,000,000,000,000 (Thirty three trillion dollars or about £17,600,000,000,000). Her holding is based on the laws of the countries she owns and her land title is valid in all the countries she owns. Her main holdings are Canada, the 2nd largest country on earth, with 2,467 million acres, Australia, the 7th largest country on earth with 1,900 million acres, the Papua New Guinea with114 million acres, New Zealand with 66 million acres and the UK with 60 million acres.

She is the world's largest landowner by a significant margin. The next largest landowner is the Russian state, with an overall ownership of 4,219 million acres, and a direct ownership comparable with the Queen's land holding of 2,447 million acres. The 3rd largest landowner is the Chinese state, which claims all of Chinese land, about 2,365 million acres. The 4th largest landowner on earth is the Federal Government of the United States, which owns about one third of the land of the USA, 760 million acres. The fifth largest landowner on earth is the King of Saudi Arabia with 553 million acres.

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 13:47:39 GMT
.. possibly because she doesn't work and has the time to do so.

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 13:59:40 GMT
I agree - Spin is full of garbled jargon. He only impresses himself.

He doesn't realise that a decrease in profit is still a profit, not a loss or a deficit. Even when accountants and business managers discuss projected sales and profits, any variation on their charts does not imply 'loss of profits' it simply means 'lower profits'. If in reality you make a loss - it can only be in relation to expected profits or that your expenses and initial costs have not been met.

Spin is obviously not an accountant, neither a business manager. The dole queue comes to mind, judging by his ravings.

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 14:17:08 GMT
nephran says:
Crikey Bert..Is that Bee ever gonna leave ..

Posted on 21 Feb 2012, 17:51:52 GMT
nephran says:
Hello everybody.I have put up a photo of me and spin on my profile..Check its!

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 19:09:09 GMT
kraka says:
Bert Einstein greetings

Welcome Bert and with respect i would say we all make errors and mistakes you aswell as Spin, and i am of the opinion that very few people here understand where Spin is coming from. He is knowledgeable in scientific matters and religion but Spin is also deeply perceptive which allows him to think outside the scientific and religous boxes, not exactly visionary but in that way. He provokes atheists and theists to look beyond what their saying. Spin has a very unique mind and uses it to provoke and challenge scientific, atheistic and theist thinking but from an angle not many are familiar with. Sometimes he'll do it with offbeat humour and play the devil.

You should tremble in the presence of genius??? LOL :)

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 19:22:55 GMT
Withnail says:
Which one is spin?

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 19:24:25 GMT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 19:26:17 GMT
Withnail says:
Nope, that's not helpin'

In reply to an earlier post on 21 Feb 2012, 19:36:23 GMT
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 21 Feb 2012, 21:31:03 GMT
kraka says:
Bert Einstein.

And what is your dillema when you havn't the wit to see when you've been TANGO'ED,... and your christian posts lack any love or compassion for your fellow man. Cheer up Bertie at least God loves you.

In reply to an earlier post on 26 Feb 2012, 11:03:01 GMT
gille liath says:
I don't believe it - can this forum be at the centre of a 'cash for compliments' racket? It seems the only plausible explanation...

Posted on 26 Feb 2012, 13:59:33 GMT
kraka says:
Really it's just a bit of harmless fun.

In reply to an earlier post on 26 Feb 2012, 14:12:06 GMT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 23 Jul 2012, 13:54:11 BST
Rick Terr says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 23 Jul 2012, 14:25:48 BST
HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA!!!!
Stupid doomsayer.

In reply to an earlier post on 23 Jul 2012, 18:31:16 BST
"do something practical"

Like become another, ten-a-penny mug proclaiming the doom of the world.

Yeah.

In reply to an earlier post on 23 Jul 2012, 19:39:58 BST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 23 Jul 2012, 19:41:59 BST
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 23 Jul 2012, 21:12:33 BST
Another conspiracy berk...

In reply to an earlier post on 24 Jul 2012, 08:40:46 BST
loser

Posted on 3 Nov 2012, 10:25:54 GMT
ralphy says:
.

Eh, I don't understand this.

What is the point of having a 'product link' if authors cannot discuss and promote their books? I thought the whole point was to generate interest and sales.

.

In reply to an earlier post on 3 Nov 2012, 18:42:59 GMT
C. A. Small says:
Having seen your various posts, to save you time, no-one is interested and you won't be selling any.
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the religion discussion forum

  Discussion Replies Latest Post
Announcement
Important Announcement from Amazon
166 26 days ago
If clergy were honest, would religions die? 47 4 minutes ago
Jesus is the way and that way is the Gnostic Christian way. Not Christianity’s way. 13 3 hours ago
Gas Bag 721 20 hours ago
The Christian project has failed as Christians vote against everything Jesus stood for 466 2 days ago
Book (Snapping of the American Mind) shows Harvard tests showing parental neglect causes homosexuality 1425 7 days ago
Discover Magazine article ("Earth's Water Is Older Than The Sun') matches the Bible book of Genesis 371 7 days ago
"Transgender" folk accepted into the Anglican Church... 56 8 days ago
How To Rule The Universe And Punish Evil 4 9 days ago
EWTN.CO.UK is a very fine British Catholic Channel and website 7 15 days ago
Should religions be classified as Fake News? The bible seems to say yes. 2 22 days ago
Why do we select warrior gods who can only grow their religions by violence, --- instead of persuasion to a better way of life? 28 26 days ago
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  religion discussion forum
Participants:  44
Total posts:  167
Initial post:  15 Dec 2011
Latest post:  26 days ago

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 2 customers