Shop now Shop now</arg> Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Shop now Learn more Shop Fire Shop Kindle Amazon Music Unlimited for Family Shop now Shop now
Customer Discussions > politics discussion forum

Woolwich Terrorist attack


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 76-100 of 443 posts in this discussion
In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 18:21:18 BDT
Spin says:
DL; Indeed. "Political correctness" and spin distorts government policy and its implementation. But I think that one cannot offend a movement that beheads a man in public.

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 18:38:52 BDT
That's exactly what I mean. Selling yourself sexually isn't liberation.

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 18:44:41 BDT
You also can't offend a movement that murders in secrecy, or kills or injures by arranged car accidents, or doctors legal documentation, or sends children to war.

Posted on 23 May 2013 18:45:24 BDT
Or rapes in subways.

Posted on 23 May 2013 18:46:18 BDT
No wait a minute, I'm thinking about 'A Clockwork Orange'. But anyway, don't go down a subway.

Posted on 23 May 2013 18:55:18 BDT
I doubt there's much screaming in Woolwich. In Western society, as we've seen on these forums, you have an endless stream of graduates of the School of Screaming for no Apparent Reason, usually male it has to be said, and with their degrees in presenteeism. All followers of Paul the Hysteric.

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 19:26:58 BDT
Last edited by the author on 23 May 2013 20:30:34 BDT
Shrek says:
Mr DLM,

OK and while we're about it perhaps we could stop meddling in their <<flyblown>> affairs and blowing thousands of them to bits.

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 19:27:36 BDT
Shrek says:
What does that feel like?

Posted on 23 May 2013 19:34:16 BDT
Last edited by the author on 23 May 2013 20:02:15 BDT
Spin says:
At least the BBC has something else to focus on other than the Oklahoma tornado...Why aren't catastrophic natural and man-made events in other nations not given as much attention? Why does the BBC show the ABC newscasts from the US but not Al Jazeera?

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 19:36:26 BDT
I'd certainly buy into that one, but the good ole US of A won't let us leave it alone.

Posted on 23 May 2013 20:03:29 BDT
Spin says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

Posted on 23 May 2013 20:28:00 BDT
Spin says:
Be sure that your soldiers overseas in war zones, upon hearing the reports about Woolwich, will NOT be humane in their treatment of Muslims...

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 20:29:35 BDT
Shrek says:
Whose soldiers?

How do you know this Spinnaker? I bet you just spun it.

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 20:29:44 BDT
shakespier says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 20:32:39 BDT
Last edited by the author on 23 May 2013 21:22:01 BDT
Shrek says:
What, they force us to do it?...'please Miss it wasn't my fault, they made me do it'

Posted on 23 May 2013 20:36:06 BDT
shakespier says:
[Customers don't think this post adds to the discussion. Show post anyway. Show all unhelpful posts.]

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 20:36:19 BDT
Shrek says:
Shakie,

<<I base everything on 'proof'>>.

How do you define your 'proof'?

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 20:40:13 BDT
Spin says:
Shakespier: I added the view concerning the publics acceptance of such violence in front of them...No response since it questions your societies acceptance of violence and addiction to social media sites...

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 20:51:59 BDT
Pipkin says:
Hi Geoffrey,
Absolutely True.......
But what many people don't know is WHY:-
The New US and British Oil Imperialism by Norman D Livergood.
http://www.hermes-press.com/impintro1.htm

I don't know if you have ever seen Chris Spivvy who suggests that this business is not all it appears????

Posted on 23 May 2013 20:57:30 BDT
Spin says:
Why is killing people by Drones more morally acceptable than killing them by machete?

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 21:20:14 BDT
Shrek says:
Is that a rhetorical question?

Are you about to answer it?

Posted on 23 May 2013 21:30:54 BDT
shakespier says:
Gordon Bennett asked shakespier " How do you define your 'proof' ?"

Incontrovertible evidence, for example 'seeing a man hacked to death in broad daylight'... No further proof required.

Posted on 23 May 2013 21:31:12 BDT
[Deleted by Amazon on 9 Jul 2013 14:24:33 BDT]

In reply to an earlier post on 23 May 2013 21:33:38 BDT
Spin says:
Jack: Shoot them? Surely not. Why not behead them? In fact, why not burn them alive on a stake?

Posted on 23 May 2013 21:41:09 BDT
[Deleted by Amazon on 9 Jul 2013 14:24:34 BDT]
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the politics discussion forum

More Customer Discussions

Most active community forums
Most active product forums

Amazon forums
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  politics discussion forum
Participants:  42
Total posts:  443
Initial post:  22 May 2013
Latest post:  8 Jun 2013

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 4 customers