Learn more Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Shop now Learn More Shop now Learn more Click Here Shop Kindle Amazon Music Unlimited for Family Shop now Shop now
Customer Discussions > politics discussion forum

Why are male nipples okay in publc and female nipples not?


Sort: Oldest first | Newest first
Showing 1-18 of 18 posts in this discussion
Initial post: 14 Jun 2012, 10:45:15 BST
Shock....horror....Madonna showed a nipple....

What does it say about people if they are bothered by a female nipple?

Posted on 14 Jun 2012, 10:49:15 BST
Cos men have hairy chests

Posted on 14 Jun 2012, 10:52:28 BST
Charlieost says:
They are ok by me and far preferable to male nipples. Who has a problem with them Simon?

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jun 2012, 11:16:27 BST
Many seem to....hence on tele this morning female nipples were "fuzzed out"...

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jun 2012, 14:21:30 BST
Shrek says:
...to get people's attention...shock horror.

I saw one paper had a two page spread of three 53 year old women bearing their nipples in FHD, no fuzz.

I think most people should keep their bodies well covered at all times.

IMMHO, the ego known as Madonna has OK nipples for and old bird, but they are not worth getting out...pity she can't sing.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jun 2012, 21:37:05 BST
Spin says:
Simon: If females were to display their breasts in public the nation would come to a standstill as all men would simply stare, drool and shift uncomfortably as their trousers get a little tighter...All seriousness aside, as I have argued on other threads, it is clothing that has dictated our concept of the body. If naked bodies were more common in society, sex would no longer be a taboo issue or commercial product...

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jun 2012, 23:17:39 BST
Shrek says:
Good point, if people saw the naked reality rather than the porn and the airbrushed, corseted fantasy it's unlikely they would be wanting sex all the time.

In reply to an earlier post on 14 Jun 2012, 23:42:15 BST
Spin says:
Gordon: Thanks. I raised that point on other threads and got attacked and deleted. It is the capitalist concern with selling fashion and the capitalist concern with selling sex which creates a conflict in the mind of the average homo sapien...

Posted on 15 Jun 2012, 00:49:40 BST
Charlieost says:
I had sex with a tree once. I was very stoned and still think that it was consensual. Not sure what kind of tree it was but I do remember it being very nippley.

Posted on 15 Jun 2012, 01:44:27 BST
Last edited by the author on 15 Jun 2012, 01:50:18 BST
CitizenX says:
Male nipples are OK in public because they are not regarded as sexually inticing. Female nipples are. The reason for this lies in the basic difference between male and female sexuality: males very strongly want and get aroused by visual images of female sexual attributes, while females are not that interested in comparison. This underlies the reason that generally speaking the female in the relationship dictates when the male is allowed to have sex with her. Males need it and females can do without it. Females have the power in this regard. This also underlies the reason that television shows are more likely to show male sexual organs than female.

Basically, there is a tacit taboo against showing females naked because we all know they are regarded as sexual objects by men. You may pretend all you want that you do not care whether a female is topless or not, but as a male the reality is that you react sexually to a naked female more than a female would to a naked man. Men generally do not complain of a headache in the bedroom. Men are less likely than women to describe a sexual advance by the opposite sex as "gross," or "disgusting." Females frequently use these words to describe horny males who make advances or express sexual interest in looking at naked females. Men rarely push away their partner's hands when their partner reaches for their crotch in an attempt to initiate sex. Females are the not-so-desperate sellers, and males are the desperate buyers.

It is a common experience for a female to reject a male's advances, even from her own male sexual partner, claiming any number of reasons she is not in the mood. The male would rarely reject the advances of his girlfriend or wife. This imbalance of the sexual characters and needs of our species explains many otherwise puzzling male-female sexual interactions. In a nutshell, women are more highly and desperately regarded sexually by men, and men therefore have to surrender some of their authority if they want to get laid. Because men do want to get laid, and women can always hold out longer than a man in this regard.

Women do not want sex as much as men do. Who ever heard of a woman getting put into the "dog box" or having to sleep on the couch because she upset her man, and he does not want her anywhere near his bed because he is just too upset to want to have sex with her?

Withholding sex is simply not the punishment for a woman that it is for a man. And so, is it really surprising that female and male nudity is treated so differently?

In reply to an earlier post on 16 Jun 2012, 19:20:23 BST
TomC says:
Good grief; it's as though the 60's never happened.

In reply to an earlier post on 16 Jun 2012, 22:21:51 BST
CitizenX says:
Tom C: Oh, they happened all right. But the 1800's also happened. We now have evolutionary insight into male/female behaviour between humans.

Disclaimer: it is entirely possible I misunderstood your post about the 60's. Please elaborate.

Anyway, I felt I should be slightly defensive in my response. But perhaps that is just the barely evolved, piss-marks-territory monkey in me.

Posted on 17 Jun 2012, 22:57:34 BST
Spin says:
Hairy meatballs evolved from hairy tacos...The male genitalia is no more than evolved extensions of the female labia and clitoris..,To make love is to "become one" in more than a mental sense...

In reply to an earlier post on 17 Jun 2012, 23:05:10 BST
Shrek says:
Oooooh.

In reply to an earlier post on 17 Jun 2012, 23:59:21 BST
Spin says:
Gordon: Sheesh! If that turned you on, wait until you read what I have to say about pubic hair....=)

In reply to an earlier post on 18 Jun 2012, 06:15:25 BST
Last edited by the author on 18 Jun 2012, 06:17:10 BST
light says:
Spin,

I don't think that a bunch of naked bodies riding the bus, sitting in a restaurant, schools, jail..... would be sanitary, do you? Think about it, have you heard of skid marks? And some people piddle when they laugh, what should menstrating women do, stay home or be confined to tents like they were in ancient times? (until they could resume public nudity)

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Jun 2012, 14:58:31 BST
Spin says:
Light: Why not? You pnly think nakedness is "unclean" and "immoral" because of your social and evironmental conditioning. OK, wear clothes when one steps out into the weather but why wear wear clothes in your own temperature controlled home? Let it all hang out, man! =)

In reply to an earlier post on 19 Jun 2012, 20:13:24 BST
I can't remember them happening but I must have been there..
‹ Previous 1 Next ›
[Add comment]
Add your own message to the discussion
To insert a product link use the format: [[ASIN:ASIN product-title]] (What's this?)
Prompts for sign-in
 


Recent discussions in the politics discussion forum

  Discussion Replies Latest Post
Prepare to defend the DPRK and the world from the mad man... 8 16 minutes ago
The beginning of the end for Ryanair? 30 22 minutes ago
The beginning of the end for Uber? 11 1 hour ago
Is Sport News? 5060 2 hours ago
I am nuke proof. I hope yar 2. 21 9 hours ago
Remember the Labour Party well and good--- Tony Blair did disarm Gadhafi of much WMD by invading Iraq in 2003 622 21 hours ago
The Church of England needs to get back into the mainstream of society--Bible is largely scientifically accurate (water is older than the Sun like Genesis said) 219 21 hours ago
Book (Snapping of the American Mind) shows Harvard tests proving homosexuality is from parental neglect 330 21 hours ago
Book (Tortured for Christ) show how horrible and murderous the communist government of North Korea was to Christians 248 21 hours ago
Why do we need firmly bosomed girls standing behind boxers...smiling...? 9 22 hours ago
Vladimir Putin’s on-point analysis of North Korea 19 2 days ago
Bring back the USSR...say the Russian people... 12 2 days ago
 

This discussion

Discussion in:  politics discussion forum
Participants:  9
Total posts:  18
Initial post:  14 Jun 2012
Latest post:  19 Jun 2012

New! Receive e-mail when new posts are made.
Tracked by 1 customer