Buy new:
£14.99£14.99
£14.43 delivery Wednesday, 26 June
Dispatches from: Amazon Sold by: Amazon
Save with Used - Very Good
£8.21£8.21
£4.90 delivery 25 June - 1 July
Dispatches from: World of Books Ltd Sold by: World of Books Ltd
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Follow the author
OK
The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines Paperback – Illustrated, 1 Oct. 2013
Purchase options and add-ons
- Print length384 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherColumbia University Press
- Publication date1 Oct. 2013
- Dimensions15.24 x 2.54 x 22.86 cm
- ISBN-100231152558
- ISBN-13978-0231152556
Popular titles by this author
The New Climate War: the fight to take back our planetPaperback£13.23 deliveryGet it as soon as Thursday, Jun 27Only 6 left in stock.
Tantrum That Saved the WorldMegan HerbertHardcover£13.09 deliveryOnly 1 left in stock (more on the way).
The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front LinesMichael MannHardcover£14.43 deliveryUsually dispatched within 4 to 7 months
Product description
Review
must-read--Jeff Goodell "Rolling Stone"
A harrowing ride through the politics of truth and denial.--Shawn Lawrence Otto "Huffington Post"
A must read for every serious student of climate change science, and gets my highest rating: five stars out of five.--Jeff Masters "Jeff Masters WunderGround Blog"
A very entertaining book that winds its way through the thicket of climate science and politics.-- "Natural Hazards Observer"
An important and disturbing account of the fossil-fuel industry's well-funded public-relations campaign to sow doubt about the validity of the science of climate change...This blistering indictment of corporate-funded chicanery demands a wide audience.-- "Kirkus Reviews (starred review)"
And if you read just one book on climate change, make it Michael E. Mann's riveting exposé of disinformation and denial....-- "Irish Times"
I heartily recommend this book for an unusually clear view of the action on the front line of climate science from one of its principle palaeoclimate protagonists.--Colin Summerhayes "Geoscientist"
If you read only one book on climate change, this one is hard to beat.-- "Perspectives on Science and Christian Faith"
In this meticulous and engaging brief on climate change research and the political backlash to legitimate scientific work, Penn State professor Mann narrates the fight against misinformation from the inside.-- "Publishers Weekly"
Mann deserves our respect and admiration for what he has been through and for his willingness to discuss it. The narrative is a deeply honest scientific coming-of-age story.--Naomi Oreskes "Physics Today"
Mann deserves praise for taking the time to speak to other scientists and citizens about what threatens us all. He is not only a brilliant scientist but an ethical hero, a model for all.--Kristin Shrader-Frechette "Metascience"
Mann's account and nontechnical rebuttal of the attacks on climate science provide an excellent primer on contemporary climate science....Highly recommended.-- "Choice"
Mann's honest and thorough testimony on the attacks against climate science is a critical step toward resolving the climate change debate.-- "Science"
One of the most useful books yet in explaining climate science, especially the use of paleoclimate proxy data to assess the history of Earth's climate.--Rudy M. Baum "Chemical & Engineering News"
The best part, in my science-geeky opinion, is readers of this book will enjoy a dazzling, informative tour of the science underlying climatology and especially the analysis that went into the diagram that caused all the ruckus.--DarkSyde "Daily Kos"
This book is well written and tells a remarkable story that is likely to be of interest to a wide range of readers.-- "Australian Book Review"
Vitally important to all citizens of a warming planet Earth.--James P. Lenfestey "Star Tribune"
Confronting climate change will require clear scientific thinking and courageous actions by many individuals. Dr, Mann's book details the powerful evidence supporting climate change as well as the relentless attempts by climate deniers to distort climate science and attack those who are speaking the truth about it.--Jerry Brown, governor of California
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Columbia University Press; Illustrated edition (1 Oct. 2013)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 384 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0231152558
- ISBN-13 : 978-0231152556
- Dimensions : 15.24 x 2.54 x 22.86 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 770,944 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 324 in Ice Hockey (Books)
- 712 in Popular Science Weather
- 950 in Global Warming & Ecology
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Dr. Michael E. Mann is Presidential Distinguished Professor in the Department of Earth and Environmental Science at the University of Pennsylvania, with a secondary appointment in the Annenberg School for Communication. He is director of the Penn Center for Science, Sustainability, and the Media (PCSSM).
Dr. Mann received his undergraduate degrees in Physics and Applied Math from the University of California at Berkeley, an M.S. degree in Physics from Yale University, and a Ph.D. in Geology & Geophysics from Yale University. His research involves the use of theoretical models and observational data to better understand Earth's climate system.
Dr. Mann was a Lead Author on the Observed Climate Variability and Change chapter of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Third Scientific Assessment Report in 2001 and was organizing committee chair for the National Academy of Sciences Frontiers of Science in 2003. He has received a number of honors and awards including NOAA's outstanding publication award in 2002 and selection by Scientific American as one of the fifty leading visionaries in science and technology in 2002. He contributed, with other IPCC authors, to the award of the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize. He was awarded the Hans Oeschger Medal of the European Geosciences Union in 2012 and was awarded the National Conservation Achievement Award for science by the National Wildlife Federation in 2013. He made Bloomberg News' list of fifty most influential people in 2013. In 2014, he was named Highly Cited Researcher by the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) and received the Friend of the Planet Award from the National Center for Science Education. He received the Stephen H. Schneider Award for Outstanding Climate Science Communication from Climate One in 2017, the Award for Public Engagement with Science from the American Association for the Advancement of Science in 2018 and the Climate Communication Prize from the American Geophysical Union in 2018. In 2019 he received the Tyler Prize for Environmental Achievement and in 2020 he received the World Sustainability Award of the MDPI Sustainability Foundation. He was elected to the U.S. National Academy of Sciences in 2020. He is a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union, the American Meteorological Society, the Geological Society of America, the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. He is also a co-founder of the award-winning science website RealClimate.org.
Dr. Mann is author of more than 200 peer-reviewed and edited publications, numerous op-eds and commentaries, and five books including Dire Predictions: Understanding Climate Change, The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines, The Madhouse Effect: How Climate Change Denial is Threatening our Planet, Destroying Our Politics, and Driving Us Crazy, The Tantrum that Saved the World and The New Climate War: The Fight to Take Back Our Planet.
Customer reviews
Our goal is to make sure that every review is trustworthy and useful. That's why we use both technology and human investigators to block fake reviews before customers ever see them. Learn more
We block Amazon accounts that violate our Community guidelines. We also block sellers who buy reviews and take legal actions against parties who provide these reviews. Learn how to report
-
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
The critical study which solidified scientific opinion about the truth of global warming was the "hockey stick graph" discovered by author Michael Mann himself in 1998, and highlighted in Al Gore's "An Inconvenient Truth" documentary on global warming. Mann's graph showed global average temperatures slowly decreasing towards a distant new ice age for most of the past 1000 years, only to spike sharply upwards in the last one, like the end of a hockey stick. The hockey stick graph was strong evidence that man-made global warming was real, and was already happening. The hockey stick graph was confirmed by many subsequent scientific studies; the handful of studies, which contradicted it, were found to have critical errors. Among climate scientists, there is no longer any doubt about the reality and seriousness of global warming.
The fossil-fuel industry, composed of multinational coal and oil companies, sought to protect their business interests by sowing public doubt in global warming, and was quick to strike back at climate scientists. They funded think-tanks and websites propagating reports by their own "experts" who cast doubts on the hockey stick. These experts were usually economists and meteorologists/TV weathermen who knew little of climate science, as well as an ever-shrinking minority of climate scientists. The misinformation campaign took advantage of a public and media largely ignorant of science, and unable to appreciate that the real scientific debate on climate change was over.
US congressmen in the thrall of oil and coal lobbyists undertook an official witch-hunt of climate scientists in 2005. Congress was unable to find any problems with the climate scientists' views; but the damage was done. Widespread media coverage of politicians like Senator James Inhofe saying that climate change was "the single greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American public" ensured that doubts about global warming continued in the public mind.
The anti-climate science campaign ultimately descended to criminal acts of hacking and baseless accusations of fraud directed at Mann and his fellow scientists. In the "Climate-gate" incident in 2009, unknown hackers stole thousands of e-mail messages from the Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia in the UK. One particular e-mail from another climate scientist to Mann was repeatedly used as evidence to claim that Mann had used a "trick" to falsify his hockey stick data and was thus able to "hide the decline" in global temperature.
Climate change deniers had a field day. In fact, the word "trick" is commonly used among mathematicians and scientists to describe a clever means of solving a difficult problem, seemingly by magic; it did not imply any wrongdoing. Likewise, the "decline" in that was being hidden was a series of temperature measurements from one particular study acknowledged by the original author to be doubtful due to pollution. A number of subsequent inquiries were conducted, and none found any wrongdoing on the part of climate scientists. Again, the damage was already done; public belief in global warming and political will to tackle it both fell dramatically.
The fog of public doubt created over global warming had long-term consequences; firstly, Barack Obama's attempts at regulating carbon emissions were rejected by the Congress. Secondly, the Climate-gate hacking had been timed to occur just before the Copenhagen summit on global warming in December 2009. Due to doubts raised by Climate-gate as well as Obama's failure to pass any carbon dioxide emissions legislation in the US, Copenhagen failed to produce any meaningful international agreement to prevent global warming.
This failure has left the planet in continued peril of global warming and consequent sea level rise, cyclones and drought. Hurricane Sandy, US/Russian crop failures and high food prices in 2012 are the beginnings of what is in store for us unless the public and politicians start taking real action to replace fossil fuels with nuclear, solar and wind power.
So, first, let this review not be about consensus (see my Notes following the review proper). His is not a book about the science of climate change; it isn't advertised as such. If you want that purchase something else. This is a "story of the science and politics". There are a very few technical passages; but most will not struggle with those (honest!) On the science it will not sway the converted. If you supported the consensus on climate change before hand this will not dissuade you. If you disagreed with the consensus it probably won't persuade you to change your beliefs.
But wait, both, wait, park the debate. Wait. This is a book that describes systematic attacks on Mann and his colleagues; very much playing the man not the ball.
The key point is that academic freedom is under attack. 60 Freedom of Information requests over a weekend is a "denial of service attack" upon researchers. Vexatious lawsuits, such as Cuccinelligate in VA, are such an attack (and an insult to the hardworking taxpayer). Regardless of your political persuasion, be it of the left or the right, we are damaging the academic freedom that has been painstakingly built up over centuries. Science is not established in a court of law - or a blog - or a newspaper. Pi is not 3, sorry Indiana. Mann has been subjected to concerted, organised and vituperative personal and professional attacks. Science is a contact sport - vigorous debate amongst practitioners is good, very very good. I want the best science, even when I don't like its results. We all should. But we should treat his book as a warning that we risk pushing people away from the hard subjects due to the abuse they'd encounter; that would not be a good result. I commend his book - it should concern us that we allow this to happen - whether you're a screaming alarmist or the darkest denier.
I repeat, this is not a good result - and I commend his book for bringing this to light. Five full stars.
(Be warned, there are a lot of notes - tons, heaps, absurd amounts. Oh, and there are notes.)
---
Notes on the topic of climate science and consensus and really nothing to do with Mann's book, but:
* As an introduction to the science of climate change Wikipedia isn't bad, try looking at "Climate change". I'd also recommend a few institutions: NASA, NOAA, the UK Met Office, etc. As I say, Mann's is not a science text. Look at journals such as Nature and Science - or SciAm and New Scientist. There are a large number of reputable introductions.
* Is there a consensus? Have your own read on Wikipedia of "Scientific opinion on climate change". If you don't like that answer, have a look on the interweb or Amazon. You can find any confirmation bias response you require. And, remember, blogs are not peer-reviewed science.
* Are there those who disagree with the consensus? Yes, as in the Wikipedia article "List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming".
---
If (ok, when) I am flamed there may be responses including: assertions that there is no consensus; references to Galileo (a scientist upsetting a church) and Lysenko (a scientist who did not back the consensus view but whose political masters viewed the consensus suspiciously); climate practitioners are in a global conspiracy to get rich; peer-review is broken (sigh); that I am a shill or even a shape-shifting seven foot tall lizard (true, hence no photo); that CO2 is plant food (as are water and manure); that McIntyre has "proved" Mann is wrong (I won't put a spoiler in here, buy and read the book and then comment); CO2 is caused by warming; the second law of thermodynamics is being violated; models can't work; MWP; "hide the decline" (another spoiler alert); Al Gore; climategate; deniergate; wind power; etc. etc - hundreds. You get the picture. My point is that all this is not the point, not at all the point. Academic freedom is at stake.
The Hockey Stick and the Climate Wars: Dispatches from the Front Lines outlines in detail dysfunctional features of humanity--whom I refer to those sabotaging deniers as outlined in this masterpiece presentation--as a Dark Triad; narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. On a personal note, in 2011, I also encountered similar repercussions, albeit I am not a climate scientist, but equal as a victim of harassing manipulative mischievous bullying plots and its resultant isolation, I know how difficult a maze it is to convey, relay and right the wrongs of misrepresentations and disinformation for the third person comprehension. Credit to the Michael Mann et al; who have set the record straight. In 500 years from now, as we evolve, humanity will hold his efforts with high esteem. I hope & pray with less hostility towards supporting humanity’s quest to be among our higher selves. Our political leaders need to be supported for their steps, but yet these steps do not go far enough nor fast enough. I expect they will with us shouldering the wheel. Ojala
Top reviews from other countries
The Hockeystick is a long term global temperature graph (600 or 1000 years) showing a recent prominent temperature spike. It was derived using tree rings and other proxy data, such as coral records and ice cores. According Dr. Mann the Hockeystick was a by-product, almost like an afterthought resulting from research on why Europe cooled more than other regions during the “Little Ice Age”. Dr. Mann was always careful not to claim that the Hockeystick would firmly establish human role in the warming. However, it incidentally challenged the prevailing myths surrounding the medieval warm period, which is one of the most misunderstood and misrepresented topics in all of paleoclimatology. To climate skeptics (or often more accurately climate deniers) MWP was a holy cow, and Dr. Mann killing it made him the target of powerful corporations, media outlets and organizations, politicians, and enraged citizens. The messenger had to be shot.
The Hockeystick was also criticized by some scientists, and it is nothing wrong with that per se. A paper by McKitrick and McIntyre claimed that the Hockeystick was an artifact by bad data, but this claim was readily refuted, and the authors quietly dropped the claim. A paper by Baliunas and Willy Soon came to a conclusion contradicting the Hockeystick but this paper had several serious problems including misrepresentations and mischaracterizations and probably should not even have been published. Yet it was immediately promoted uncritically and widely by those with a policy ax to grind. As a side note (not in book); Willy Soon was later investigated for failing to disclose (to article publishers), the $1.2 million in funding over 10 years that he had received from the Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation and other fossil-fuel interests. At the same time more than a dozen other independent studies confirmed the Hockeystick. Despite this the Hockeystick was claimed to be wrong and even a fraud (as I said, I once believed that too) and there were aggressive calls for investigations, which was ridiculous but they were still done, and they cleared Dr. Mann of any wrong doing.
I should add that this book explains some of the science related to the Hockeystick and anthropomorphic global warming, as well as some of the typical areas of climate change skepticism/(or denial). However, the main focus of this book is on what Dr. Mann refers to as the climate wars. This war features massive corporation funded disinformation campaigns, attacks on climate scientists, large scale defamation campaigns, threats, death threats, the media wars, the media glorification of charlatans, bogus lawsuits, etc. Climate Scientists received death threats via emails or phone messages, some of them credible, and dead rats at their door steps. As an example, Dr. Mann was told “you and your colleagues who have promoted this scandal ought to be shot, quartered and fed to the pigs along with your whole damn families.” However, a lot more troubling in my opinion was the ridicule, disinformation, and threats from established organizations, public figures, and prominent politicians.
A video defaming (lying) and ridiculing Dr. Mann created by Koch and Scaife funded groups was widely promoted and distributed. Right wing provocateur Andrew Breitbart had tweeted “Capital punishment for Dr. James Hansen” (James Hansen is a famous climate scientist). Commentator Marc Sheppard called climate scientists “lying perpetrators of fraud”. Glenn Beck listed bogus allegations against IPCC. Attorney General of Virginia Ken Cuccinelli demanded that the University of Virginia turn over every email, record, or document it had related to Dr. Mann from his time there from 1999 to 2005. Organizations such as Global Climate Coalition, Koch Industries, Scaife, ExxonMobil, American Enterprise Institute, Heartland Institute, Cato Institute, and Citizens for Sound Economy, the Telegraph in the UK, National Review, Fox News, Washington Times, etc, misrepresented the science and defamed scientists. I should add that long before I read this book I had detected dishonest distortion of the science in many of the publications mentioned. I cannot trust the Telegraph or National Review and I’ve stopped watching Fox News.
Since I am from Texas the case involving Representative Joe Barton was especially interesting to me. In 2005 Joe Barton sent a letter to Dr. Mann that started out by ironically grossly misrepresenting Dr. Mann’s own research and then demanding extensive materials stretching back throughout his entire career for a congressional investigation. However, curiously, Joe Barton had no such subpoena power, that required congressional approval, and most of Dr. Mann’s data was available on the internet. This was an obvious attempt to intimidate and silence a scientist or perhaps create a “phony scandal”. However, Dr. Mann still had to prepare to defend himself and luckily the European Geophysical Union stepped up to protest the abuse of power.
In my opinion the most interesting chapter in the book is chapter 14 “Climategate: The Real Story”. I have to admit that I once thought that this was a real scandal. The truth is that the so called Climategate is a manufactured/phony scandal created to defame certain scientists and to cast doubt on climate science. In November 2009 a server at the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at the University of East Anglia (UEA) was hacked by an external attacker. Thousands of private emails were stolen and scanned for juicy content that could implicate the climate scientists in something. Words and phrases in twenty of the emails were picked and taken out of context in an effort to malign Dr. Mann and a few other climate scientists. As an example, by cherry picking a couple of words and by deleting 23 words in between the often repeated phrase “trick to hide the decline” was created. However, the “trick” and “hide the decline” had nothing to do with each other, and was not referring to recent warming, but rather the far more mundane issue of how to compare proxy and instrumental records. Someone (falsely) called it “Dr. Mann’s dirty laundry” and the Telegraph and National Review had a field day with this issue. Fox News called it Global Warming’s Waterloo. The issue was investigated and the climate scientists involved (Dr. Mann and a few others) were cleared of all wrong doing. I wonder how many of us could be made out to be terrible people if all our emails were hacked and phrases were selected out of context to show wrong doing? The perpetrators of this illegal cyber attack have not been found. I wonder who they were.
One thing I like about the book is that it has extensive end notes with lots of references for further reading and backup of claims, including references to peer reviewed articles. You can really dig in as deep as you wish. The book is very interesting, well organized, and intelligently written, but I have to say that I still found this book difficult to read. That is not because it is boring, or because the science is too complex. It was difficult to read because it was so troubling. How does Dr. Mann keep himself from exploding in rage? After reading this book I feel sorry for climate scientists. I could possibly have ended up as one since I started out with an interest in physics (Masters Degree) but I switched to computer/robotics engineering. I certainly don’t want to be intimidated and defamed for just doing my job with diligence and integrity. This is scary stuff. A couple of my kids are interested in science. Should I discourage them? Well I won’t discourage them. I am just glad to be aware of what is going on. As a final word I highly recommend this book, it is a very important and eye opening book.
I was well aware of most technical aspects related to the problems
of climate change and global warming. What I never reckoned before,
was the role which the same forces supporting the tobacco industry,
the creationism hoax and all politically retrograde agenda play in the
context. Of course, I always new that the oil industry was one of
the very active parties in the effort of denying global warming.
The story showing the direct attacks on one of the pillars of Science,
the peer review process for publication of results is impressive. The
cynicism of politicians and all sorts of "hired guns" playing the denial
game is also remarkable.
The process of increasingly awareness Dr. Mann went through along the
years of his battle holding the "Hockey Stick" is most inspirational
and exposes the role every one of us play today with respect to
environment we live in the future of the next generations.
After all, Dr. Mann has a cautious but optimistic view on how the
future on planet Earth will look like: if guided by rationality and
Science, we may have a chance of surviving.

