£4.71 + FREE UK delivery
In stock. Sold by Go Inks

4 Photo Magenta Compatible Canon CLI-8PM Printer Ink Cartridges (Chipped) for Canon PIXMA iP6600D iP6700D MP950 MP960 MP970 Pro 9000 & Pro 9000 Mark II

4.8 out of 5 stars 12 customer reviews

Price: £4.71 FREE UK delivery.
In stock.
Dispatched from and sold by Go Inks.
    This fits your .
  • Enter your model number above to make sure this fits.
  • ISO9001 Manufacturing Compliance
  • Inks are chipped and ready to use - Just Install and Print
  • Compatible brand by Go Inks®
  • Contains: 14ml
  • Replaces: CLI-8PM

Frequently Bought Together

  • 4 Photo Magenta Compatible Canon CLI-8PM Printer Ink Cartridges (Chipped) for Canon PIXMA iP6600D iP6700D MP950 MP960 MP970 Pro 9000 & Pro 9000 Mark II
  • +
  • 4 Photo Cyan Compatible Canon CLI-8PC Printer Ink Cartridges for Canon PIXMA iP6600D iP6700D MP950 MP960 MP970 Pro 9000 & Pro 9000 Mark II
  • +
  • 4 Yellow Compatible Canon CLI-8Y Printer Ink Cartridges (Chipped) for Canon Pixma iP3300 iP3500 iP4200 iP4300 iP4500 iP5200 iP5200R iP5300 iP6600D iP6700D iX4000 iX5000 MP500 MP510 MP520 MP530 MP600 MP600R MP610 MP800 MP800R MP810 MP830 MP970 MX700 MX850 Pro 9000 & Pro 9000 Mark II
Total price: £14.13
Buy the selected items together

Product Information

Technical Details
BrandGo Inks®
ColourMagenta
Manufacturer Part NumberCLI-8PMx4
  
Additional Information
ASINB00413FJOO
Best Sellers Rank 41,700 in Office Products (See top 100)
Date First Available27 Oct. 2010
  
Feedback
 Would you like to give feedback on images?
 

Product Description

High quality compatible brand to replace Canon printer ink cartridges. Designed to be an exact replacement, with more ink in the cartridge than the O.E.M. counterpart, you will find these cartridges lasting longer and save you money!


Customer Questions & Answers

Customer Reviews

4.8 out of 5 stars
5 star
10
4 star
2
3 star
0
2 star
0
1 star
0
See all 12 customer reviews
Share your thoughts with other customers

Top Customer Reviews

Verified Purchase
In comparison to the Canon brand these are fantastic vaue for money. They fit into my printer with no hassle, register on the ink monitor so I can see how long I have left before I need to change cartridge and the ink quality is excellent. Will use again.
Comment One person found this helpful. Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
I give a 5 star rating as there is no comparison in price with the genuine canon cartridge, and no noticeable difference in quality of print. The only difference might be in the longevity of the print, ( time will tell )

I recommend these cartridges to anyone who has an interest in printing their own photographs
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
The product corresponds to the description and fits perfectly in the Canon printer. Quite expensive though for the number of cartridge.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
great replacement! Using them for about 4 years now and never ever have i had any problems. Will definitely continue!
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
just like the original, top quality replacement cartridge fitted to my Canon pro 9000 mk 2 works exactly like the OEM
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse
Verified Purchase
Good quality. It fullfilled my demand for ink for my printer. Printed out test in A4 with very good result.
Comment Was this review helpful to you? Yes No Sending feedback...
Thank you for your feedback.
Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again
Report abuse