- Save 10% on selected children’s books, compliments of Amazon Family Promotion exclusive for Prime members .
- Also check our best rated Biography reviews
Olivier Paperback – 4 Sep 2014
- Choose from over 13,000 locations across the UK
- Prime members get unlimited deliveries at no additional cost
- Find your preferred location and add it to your address book
- Dispatch to this address when you check out
Special offers and product promotions
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
What other items do customers buy after viewing this item?
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support?
'A triumph ... It succeeds, as far as is humanly possible, in bringing alive on the page Olivier's magnetic theatrical presence, which those who saw him act will never forget' John Carey, Sunday Times. (Sunday Times)
'An elegant and increasingly compelling book' Simon Callow, Guardian. (Guardian)
'Without adulation, sentimentality and or sneer, layer by layer as the 82 years of Olivier's life flow by Ziegler painstakingly uncovers a portrait of a real man. It is enthralling. I took it on holiday and could hardly bear to finish it ... tremendous' Libby Purves, The Times. (The Times)
'Philip Ziegler's splendid biography confirms the contention that Lord Olivier OM is as great a figure in the history of the English theatre as David Garrick or Sir Henry Irving' Economist. (Economist)
'Philip's book is the Larry I knew' Tarquin Olivier. (Tarquin Olivier)
About the Author
Philip Ziegler was a diplomat before becoming an editorial director at the publishers William Collins. His many books include acclaimed biographies of Laurence Olivier, William IV, Lady Diana Cooper, Lord Mountbatten and Harold Wilson, as well as the classic history of the Black Death.
Top customer reviews
It would have been better if Ziegler had left out everything before and after Olivier's time at the National Theatre and called his book 'Olivier and the National Theatre'. For it is this section which is by far the strongest and most interesting as it goes into great detail on this period of Olivier's life.
Everything else is told in scant detail, particularly the last 15 years of Olivier's life which Ziegler races through in a mere 30 pages.
I found it difficult to keep tracks of events as there was often little reference made to dates and when there were they caused confusion as they appeared out of sequence. The biography lurches awkwardly and abruptly from one stage of Olivier's career to another with each new chapter as though the book were an anthology with each segment written by a different author.
The lack of detail was often frustrating, For example Ziegler mentions that Olivier had just done a film (what film?) or a play (which play?) and whatever people may say about Donald Spoto's biography (which I much preferred) no one could ever accuse that biographer of failing to provide an adequate amount of detailed research.
There are many significant plays and particularly films in Olivier’s career that are either skimmed over or omitted altogether.
Other reviewers have pointed out the factual errors in this biography, one in particular that stood out for me was Ziegler's assertion that during Olivier's farewell party on the set of 'Marathon Man' Dustin Hoffman 'proposed a toast to "a great soldier, a great warrior" but not to "a great actor"...'
I've seen footage of this party and Hoffman specifically praises Olivier as 'a great actor' in the same sentence as calling him 'a great soldier'.
How is it possible for Ziegler to make that mistake?
I finished the book thinking that Olivier, who some may argue (with justification) was not actually the greatest actor of his generation, but was unquestionably a man whose dedication and work ethic were almost superhuman, deserved a better and fuller account of his life and work.
The picture which comes across is not an unfamiliar one for a man seen as great through his achievements.Visionary and charismatic, but also prepared to be insensitive to the point of cruelty with those who are not, or who are no longer, useful to him. As a study in leadership, it is fascinating, as while Olivier had many of the characteristics of a great leader, he had the added benefit of the power of the expert. As well as having the vision, he was also viewed as the greatest at doing the job of those he was leading, namely acting.
Being too young to have seen the great man on stage, it is difficult to understand the awe in which he was held. The screen performances have a distinct odour of cured porcine, and it would be interesting to know the balance between these simply portraying an acting style to the taste of a different age, as against being those of a stage actor struggling with a different medium. The fact that contemporary and possible peer, Gielgud's performances do seem to stand up better suggests that the latter is true.
The relationship with Gielgud is one of the most interesting parts of the book, which portrays rivalry, petty jealousy, but also mutual admiration and acts of great kindness; Gielgud's gift of a sword bequeathed to him by a great actor of the past, Olivier's defence of Gielgud when there were attempts to bar him from the Garrick club on account of his homosexuality. In the end, the picture is of Olivier the greater actor-director, Gielgud the greater human being.
The weaknesses of Olivier's character run through the book suggesting a man who may have been easier to love than to like, inspiring but petty, engaging but cold. This is a theme which is strongest in the consideration of Olivier's love life, a particular area where the author displays his tendency to present facts rather than to analyse or to judge . Here is a man who was married three times, who had a life of towering passion with Vivien Leigh,but who was also a serial adulterer, seemingly taking lovers, frequently his fellow actors, as a habit, in a fashion in which normal mortals take holidays.
He is portrayed as a man of great contradictions, capable of extravagant public praise for a rival, but intense personal jealousy; an instinctive conservative who sought to embrace radicalism in the theatre; a man with an intense desire for control who tried (not always successfully) to encourage free thinking subordinates; less seriously a rampant heterosexual who adopted the screamingly camp speech patterns of the archetypal "luvvie". Perhaps the contradictions are more understandable when viewed as being part of a man who suppressed some natural elements of his character in order to serve his drive and ambition.
At the end the most lasting impression is that of a man who was defined by his work in two fundamental ways. Quite clearly he will be remembered for his achievements, the great Shakespearean roles, the support for modernism in the theatre, and above all the development of the National Theatre. He is also portrayed as an actor in personal as well as professional life; his biographer, his contemporaries and the man himself all question whether they knew him, or he knew himself. At the end of the day was he simply a man of great ambition who acted whatever role was expected of him , or was necessary to succeed, but in whom the intrinsic core character was under developed.
I cannot say, with the voice of anyone who was around at the time of Olivier's public prominence, whether this is a great autobiography. However, if you are someone with an interest in the theatre or in acting, and who is aware of the man as a historical presence, but doesn't know a great deal more, then you are likely to find this a absorbing read.