Buy new:
£10.09£10.09
FREE delivery:
Monday, March 13
in the UK
Dispatches from: Amazon Sold by: Abulfazl
Buy used £3.95
Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet or computer – no Kindle device required. Learn more
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Waterloo: Four Days that Changed Europe's Destiny Paperback – 5 Feb. 2015
| Amazon Price | New from | Used from |
|
Kindle Edition
"Please retry" | — | — |
|
Audible Audiobooks, Unabridged
"Please retry" |
£0.00
| Free with your Audible trial | |
Enhance your purchase
'A fabulous story, superbly told' Max Hastings
The bloodbath at Waterloo ended a war that had engulfed the world for over twenty years. It also finished the career of the charismatic Napoleon Bonaparte. It ensured the final liberation of Germany and the restoration of the old European monarchies, and it represented one of very few defeats for the glorious French army, most of whose soldiers remained devoted to their Emperor until the very end.
Extraordinary though it may seem much about the Battle of Waterloo has remained uncertain, with many major features of the campaign hotly debated. Most histories have depended heavily on the evidence of British officers that were gathered about twenty years after the battle. But the recent publication of an abundance of fresh first-hand accounts from soldiers of all the participating armies has illuminated important episodes and enabled radical reappraisal of the course of the campaign. What emerges is a darker, muddier story, no longer biased by notions of regimental honour, but a tapestry of irony, accident, courage, horror and human frailty.
An epic page turner, rich in dramatic human detail and grounded in first-class scholarly research, Waterloo is the real inside story of the greatest land battle in British history, the defining showdown of the age of muskets, bayonets, cavalry and cannon.
- Print length704 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherAbacus
- Publication date5 Feb. 2015
- Dimensions12.5 x 3 x 19.5 cm
- ISBN-100349123012
- ISBN-13978-0349123011
Frequently bought together

- +
Customers who viewed this item also viewed
Product description
Review
A quite brilliant piece of meticulous historical detective work . . . I have no doubt that this book will become a classic ― Scotland on Sunday
An incisive analysis of how the battle unravelled and why ― The Times
Clayton makes the fog of war central to the narrative; we are pitched into the chaos and din of Waterloo . . . We experience it as Wellington or Napoleon or an ordinary soldier would have done ― Daily Telegraph
Tim Clayton not only gives a masterful account of the battle that changed the face of Europe but also sets it in its proper context . . . Clayton manages the difficult trick in military history of providing a blow-by-blow account without losing the flow of the narrative ― Express
Nuanced, broad, searching and elegant . . . the overall integrity of his scholarship is undeniable. The book may well become the most authoritative account of the four-day campaign ― Spectator
Tim Clayton's book is the best overview of the meeting of the three armies -- Simon Heffer ― New Statesman
Magnificent and magisterial ― Literary Review
Book Description
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Abacus (5 Feb. 2015)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 704 pages
- ISBN-10 : 0349123012
- ISBN-13 : 978-0349123011
- Dimensions : 12.5 x 3 x 19.5 cm
- Best Sellers Rank: 248,061 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- 67 in History of Belgium
- 145 in History of Napoleonic Wars
- Customer reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read author blogs and more
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings, help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyses reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on Amazon-
Top reviews
Top reviews from United Kingdom
There was a problem filtering reviews right now. Please try again later.
Despite the subtitle, "Four days that changed Europe's destiny" the book gives only relatively brief attention to the wider context of the battle, and in doing so assumes that it was necessarily important - as opposed to the counter-argument that given the relative strengths of France and the alliance Napoleon faced, he was bound to lose the campaign of 1815 even if he had won the first major battle. It's a shame that Clayton didn't explore this question in more detail given how skillfully he handles many other debates over the battle, such as the relative credit which is due to Wellington and to Blucher.
It's not only those debates he handles skillfully for the narrative of the two days of battle at the heart of the book is brilliant, weaving in detailed personal accounts with a broader explanation of which troops were headed where and with what significance.
Though the detail is a little mesmerising at times (I don't think I've had as many detailed accounts of the sizes of gardens even when watching gardening programs), the significance of the detail is always explained clearly - as is the key role played by the fog of war, both with Wellington's initial grievous failure of intelligence omitting to spot Napoleon's invasion of Belgium and then later the confusion between Napoleon's commanders resulting in his troops often being in the wrong place at the wrong time.
Unglamorous but vital staff work in trying to get soldiers into vaguely sensible locations at roughly relevant times was crucial - as was then the ability to identify whether approach troops were your allies or enemies. Death by friendly fire abounded.
As someone with a half-decent knowledge of the battle before reading the book, three details struck me particularly. First, how much is still unknown about the detailed facts of the events despite the huge volume of literature about the battle.
Second, the way cannon balls were fired. Perhaps I've relied too much on film and TV for my knowledge of warfare in the time of cannons, but I had completely missed that it was usual for cannons to bounce along like a Barnes Wallis bomb on land - and that this was a deliberate technique for a bouncing cannon ball could cause far more carnage than one which simply ploughed into one target and stopped. Perhaps in pre-CGI days it was too hard to show bouncing bombs in fiction and reconstruction - and hence the abiding visual image of cannons being fired is one that is wrong.
Third, for all the glorious place that Waterloo acquired in British history, it was horrendously gruesome with a density of killing that exceeded that of the Somme in 1916. That comparison really brings home quite what lies behind the bald death and injury statistics.
It makes for a sobering as well as illuminating read.
Firstly, the key role of the Prussians in going well "above and beyond" in keeping faith with Wellington; indeed, it can be strongly argued that, while Wellington successfully prevented the Allies from losing the battle, it was Blücher who actually won it. The later spin by Wellington amongst others does little credit to anyone, least of all the soldiers at Waterloo.
Secondly, and in a similar vein, Tim Clayton redresses the balance a little in describing the role of various nationalities (eg Belgians, Dutch, Brunswickers) involved on the Allied side, who, despite the pressures, performed in general better than later credited.
Tim Clayton also quietly brings into question (challenges would be too strong a term) some of the tales associated with the British troops - it would appear that by the time of the advance of the Imperial Guard, Wellington had no options except to hold the ground and it seems that the 1st Foot Guards did not repel the Guard as emphatically as previously thought, in the sense that the Guard was already picking up on the catatrophe swiftly enveloping the French right wing.
What is interesting is that Tim Clayton pays tribute to the French skill with artillery, which if used better in conjunction with infantry and cavalry, would have provided victory for Napoleon – it's clear that a battle of attrition was taking place and that the French were successful in clearing the Allied army off most parts of the ridge, with some suggestions that the battered squares had been moved some way north; whether this was an advantage to the French is questionable, as it lengthened the thinning corridor of their reinforcements and supplies.
One is left asking how/why Napoleon lost, but Tim Clayton describes well how the essential gamble behind Napoleon's daring strategy was undone by unfamiliar personalities in his staff, generals (such as Ney and in particular Grouchy) who couldn't see the big picture, and Napoleon's unwillingness to accept that British infantry could absorb enormous pressure. Some of the French quotes about the British soldiers "rooted to the spot" echo some Norman comments about Harold's forces at Hastings.
Tim Clayton also pays tribute to the bravery and courage of the French, (who were hardly "cheese-eating surrender monkeys" here) who had good reason to believe until the last 30 minutes before the rout that they were slowly but surely winning; the tale of Larry, the captured French surgeon, who was spared by Blücher for having tended his son on an earlier occasion and who as a captive later cared for wounded in Brussels, is evocative of the chivalry amidst the carnage.
Like many other commentators, this in my view THE reference book for the campaign and battle for the educated lay reader – my only caveat would be that a few more maps of the progression of the battle would have been useful.







