- Paperback: 360 pages
- Publisher: Collins; New edition edition (8 May 2001)
- Language: English
- ISBN-10: 0004725409
- ISBN-13: 978-0004725406
- Product Dimensions: 23 x 14.4 x 3 cm
- Average Customer Review: 3.5 out of 5 stars See all reviews (8 customer reviews)
- Amazon Bestsellers Rank: 1,111,661 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
Unheralded Victory: Who Won the Vietnam War? Paperback – 8 May 2001
|New from||Used from|
Enter your mobile number or email address below and we'll send you a link to download the free Kindle App. Then you can start reading Kindle books on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
To get the free app, enter your mobile phone number.
From the Author
The truth behind the Vietnam War
I wanted to tell the real story about the American and Australian conduct of the war in Vietnam. I wanted to set the record straight and maybe help undo some of those various myths and falsehoods that have characterised most histories - and the popular memory - of that conflict. Unheralded Victory is the result and i have been delighted by the response. Veterans and military people have hailed it as 'the truth at last.' The general public and non-military book reviewers, after their initial incredulity (the Communists lost???!!) have been equally enthusiastic about it. Maybe the veterans of those actions against the Viet Cong and the North Vietnamese Army will now get the long-overdue credit and respect they earned. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
From the Back Cover
Unheralded Victory is a revisionist history of the Vietnam war, charting the defeat of the Viet Cong. It investigates why the popular image of the war then, as now, is that propagated by Hanoi’s propoganda machine, and why US propaganda was so clumsy. Many myths are debunked: drug use among forces, ‘fragging’, US morale: the author’s account squares with the recollection of actual veterans. He also exposes a number of ‘eyewitnesses’, some active in the veterans’ organizations who were never in Vietnam and whose false testimony has contributed to enduring myth of the ‘crazed ‘Nam veteran’ as portrayed in cinema and TV.See all Product Description
Top Customer Reviews
highest casualties of any Australian combat platoon (34) during a one year
tour (1966-7) reading Mark's book "Unheralded Victory" reinforces my belief
in what the Free World achieved. Victory over the Communist forces of North
For over thirty years (1965-2000) the American and Australian media machine
has never been objective in writing about Vietnam. I believe that they
deliberately distorted the truth, conned by the enemies propaganda. This
distortion has now been accepted by politicians and the uninformed, mostly
academic, commentators. Why, because they are the tertiary product of the
socialist orientated lecturers in Australia's Universities post Vietnam.
Until Mark Woodruff's "Unheralded Victory" became available only those who
fought the war knew the truth. The war was won by The Free World Forces as
early as 1970, but it took three years for the North Vietnamese to con us
into signing their acceptable peace. A peace that they had always intended
to smash when they were ready to reinvade the south. This they did in 1975
after all the Free World Forces had left and the South Vietnamese government
was downsizing it's armed forces by scores of thousands.
Bravo Mark, your book should be compulsory reading for all military
historians and those who seek the truth, the others fail the test of truth.
11 Pl D Company 6RAR
Viet Nam 1966-7
America entered Vietnam to stop the spread of communism through the country. By the time they left the south had not fallen to the red tide...therefore they succeeded in their mission.
This drastically over-simplifies the situation to a startling degree. Ignoring the obvious fact that the U.S was simply propping up a regime that was rotten to the core, Woodruff attempts to legitimise pretty much EVERY US action in some way or another.
On the flip-side it DOES present a lot of statistical evidence to back up his claims, some of which is pretty damned interesting BUT, what is it politicians say about 'lies, damn lies and statistics'?
From reading his book, you would think that the Viet Cong did not kill a single U.S. soldier, regardless of the fact that 58,000 American soldiers perished.
Certainly, the U.S. killed far more Viet Cong, NVA and Vietnamese civilians with bombing of villages, using agent orange, napalm, and all that other "good stuff" compared to their enemy, but whether this can be called "a military victory" is highly questionable. Also, according to Woodruff, the My Lai massacre was the only time that U.S. soldiers murdered Vietnamese civilians. Never mind the documentary, eye-witness and other evidence that has been gathered, demonstrating how the U.S. army dropped tons of napalm and agent orange, maiming villagers and causing permanent radioactive damage to their bodies.
I suggest reading a book on Vietnam that looks at the war more objectively because Woodruff is completely biased with his "commies-were-bad-guys,we-were-good-guys" attitude and about Communist propaganda (like the South Vietnamese and Americans didn't have propaganda of their own).
Most Recent Customer Reviews
Who won the war? The Vietnamese. Who lost? The USA, but some US citizens are not man enough to accept that the US state lost, and that it lost because it deserved to lose. Read morePublished on 11 July 2003 by William Podmore
For those of us who had nothing to do with the event, and who only know the 'informed gossip' this is a good book. Read morePublished on 23 July 2001 by firstname.lastname@example.org
This book opened my eyes to what really happened in Nam. The view that jo-public has is that American forces were humilated by a third rate army. Read morePublished on 24 Jun. 2001 by Mr. R. J. Ellis